Self-reported POCUS practice and confidence after structured workshop for early-career nephrologists: a questionnaire study.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Clinical and Experimental Nephrology Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-29 DOI:10.1007/s10157-026-02909-7
Fumiya Kitano, Masafumi Sakai, Kana Shirai, Keisuke Yoshida, Yugo Shibagaki, Masahiko Yazawa
{"title":"Self-reported POCUS practice and confidence after structured workshop for early-career nephrologists: a questionnaire study.","authors":"Fumiya Kitano, Masafumi Sakai, Kana Shirai, Keisuke Yoshida, Yugo Shibagaki, Masahiko Yazawa","doi":"10.1007/s10157-026-02909-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is increasingly incorporated into nephrology practice, yet comparative data on educational strategies and the durability of their effects remain limited. We conducted a questionnaire-based study to examine whether a structured workshop (WS) differs from on-the-job training (OJT) in shaping self-reported POCUS practice and confidence among early-career nephrologists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In August 2025, nephrologists with fewer than 15 postgraduate years at a single academic center were surveyed. Participants were categorized into three cohorts: those who attended a structured WS program (didactic lectures and hands-on training) in 2023, those who received OJT only in 2024, and those who received OJT only in 2025. All assessments were retrospectively reported at a single survey time point. Outcomes included self-rated confidence in examination frequency, technical skill, image interpretation, and mentoring others using a 5-point Likert scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-four respondents (79.1% of all eligible nephrologists) were analyzed. In recalled post-training assessments, the WS group demonstrated higher confidence in interpretation and mentoring compared with OJT cohorts, whereas no differences were observed in technical skill or examination frequency. At the time of the survey, no significant between-group differences persisted. Within the WS group, confidence scores declined across all domains over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this exploratory study, structured workshops were associated with greater recalled post-training confidence in interpretative and mentoring domains, but these gains attenuated without reinforcement. Sustainable integration of nephrology-specific POCUS may require longitudinal, organization-supported educational frameworks rather than isolated instructional interventions, such as OJT alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":10349,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":"1504-1509"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10157-026-02909-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is increasingly incorporated into nephrology practice, yet comparative data on educational strategies and the durability of their effects remain limited. We conducted a questionnaire-based study to examine whether a structured workshop (WS) differs from on-the-job training (OJT) in shaping self-reported POCUS practice and confidence among early-career nephrologists.

Methods: In August 2025, nephrologists with fewer than 15 postgraduate years at a single academic center were surveyed. Participants were categorized into three cohorts: those who attended a structured WS program (didactic lectures and hands-on training) in 2023, those who received OJT only in 2024, and those who received OJT only in 2025. All assessments were retrospectively reported at a single survey time point. Outcomes included self-rated confidence in examination frequency, technical skill, image interpretation, and mentoring others using a 5-point Likert scale.

Results: Thirty-four respondents (79.1% of all eligible nephrologists) were analyzed. In recalled post-training assessments, the WS group demonstrated higher confidence in interpretation and mentoring compared with OJT cohorts, whereas no differences were observed in technical skill or examination frequency. At the time of the survey, no significant between-group differences persisted. Within the WS group, confidence scores declined across all domains over time.

Conclusion: In this exploratory study, structured workshops were associated with greater recalled post-training confidence in interpretative and mentoring domains, but these gains attenuated without reinforcement. Sustainable integration of nephrology-specific POCUS may require longitudinal, organization-supported educational frameworks rather than isolated instructional interventions, such as OJT alone.

早期职业肾病学家结构化研讨会后自我报告的POCUS实践和信心:一项问卷调查研究。
导读:即时超声(POCUS)越来越多地纳入肾脏病实践,但教育策略的比较数据和其效果的持久性仍然有限。我们进行了一项基于问卷的研究,以检查结构化研讨会(WS)与在职培训(OJT)在塑造早期职业肾病学家自我报告的POCUS实践和信心方面是否不同。方法:于2025年8月对在单一学术中心攻读研究生少于15年的肾病学家进行调查。参与者被分为三组:2023年参加结构化WS项目(教学讲座和实践培训)的人,2024年只接受OJT的人,以及2025年只接受OJT的人。所有评估均在单一调查时间点回顾性报告。结果包括使用5分李克特量表对检查频率、技术技能、图像解释和指导他人的自评信心。结果:34名应答者(占所有符合条件的肾病学家的79.1%)被分析。在回顾培训后的评估中,与OJT组相比,WS组在口译和指导方面表现出更高的信心,而在技术技能或检查频率方面没有观察到差异。在调查期间,各组之间没有明显的差异。在WS组中,随着时间的推移,所有领域的信心得分都有所下降。结论:在这一探索性研究中,结构化的研讨会与在解释和指导领域更大的训练后信心相关,但这些收益在没有强化的情况下减弱。肾病特异性POCUS的可持续整合可能需要纵向的、组织支持的教育框架,而不是孤立的教学干预,如单独的OJT。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical and Experimental Nephrology
Clinical and Experimental Nephrology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
135
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Nephrology is a peer-reviewed monthly journal, officially published by the Japanese Society of Nephrology (JSN) to provide an international forum for the discussion of research and issues relating to the study of nephrology. Out of respect for the founders of the JSN, the title of this journal uses the term “nephrology,” a word created and brought into use with the establishment of the JSN (Japanese Journal of Nephrology, Vol. 2, No. 1, 1960). The journal publishes articles on all aspects of nephrology, including basic, experimental, and clinical research, so as to share the latest research findings and ideas not only with members of the JSN, but with all researchers who wish to contribute to a better understanding of recent advances in nephrology. The journal is unique in that it introduces to an international readership original reports from Japan and also the clinical standards discussed and agreed by JSN.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书