Mediating and Moderating Role of Green Innovation and Environmental Regulation Between Green Knowledge Management and Environmental Performance: Evidence From Ethiopian Industrial Parks

IF 5.7 Q1 BUSINESS
Ayano Wako Jenga, Sandeep Singh
{"title":"Mediating and Moderating Role of Green Innovation and Environmental Regulation Between Green Knowledge Management and Environmental Performance: Evidence From Ethiopian Industrial Parks","authors":"Ayano Wako Jenga,&nbsp;Sandeep Singh","doi":"10.1002/bsd2.70376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Grounded in the resource-based view (RBV), the knowledge-based view (KBV), and the institutional theory (IT), this study examines how green product and process innovations serve as mechanisms linking green knowledge management (GKM) and environmental performance (EP) in an emerging economy context. The study also examined how environmental regulation (ER) serves as a boundary condition. To achieve this objective, the study develops and tests the mediation and moderation model utilizing cross-sectional survey data from 331 managerial-level employees of firms in Ethiopian Industrial Parks. Covariance-based structural equation modeling (CB-SEM) with AMOS was employed to test the relationships. The findings indicate that GKM has a significant direct influence on green product innovation (GPtI), green process innovation (GPcI), and EP. Furthermore, GPcI partially mediates the relationship between GKM and EP, whereas GPtI does not. Finally, ER does not show a significant moderating effect on the relationship between GKM and EP. These findings contribute by refining the mechanisms by which GKM enhances EP through disaggregating GI into product and process dimensions and examining the conditional role of ER within the RBV, KBV, and IT framework. The findings provide context-specific and actionable insights for managers and policymakers, highlighting the stronger role of GPcI relative to GPtI and the complementary benefits of GKM and GPcI in enhancing EP, while indicating a limited role of ER.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36531,"journal":{"name":"Business Strategy and Development","volume":"9 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Strategy and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bsd2.70376","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Grounded in the resource-based view (RBV), the knowledge-based view (KBV), and the institutional theory (IT), this study examines how green product and process innovations serve as mechanisms linking green knowledge management (GKM) and environmental performance (EP) in an emerging economy context. The study also examined how environmental regulation (ER) serves as a boundary condition. To achieve this objective, the study develops and tests the mediation and moderation model utilizing cross-sectional survey data from 331 managerial-level employees of firms in Ethiopian Industrial Parks. Covariance-based structural equation modeling (CB-SEM) with AMOS was employed to test the relationships. The findings indicate that GKM has a significant direct influence on green product innovation (GPtI), green process innovation (GPcI), and EP. Furthermore, GPcI partially mediates the relationship between GKM and EP, whereas GPtI does not. Finally, ER does not show a significant moderating effect on the relationship between GKM and EP. These findings contribute by refining the mechanisms by which GKM enhances EP through disaggregating GI into product and process dimensions and examining the conditional role of ER within the RBV, KBV, and IT framework. The findings provide context-specific and actionable insights for managers and policymakers, highlighting the stronger role of GPcI relative to GPtI and the complementary benefits of GKM and GPcI in enhancing EP, while indicating a limited role of ER.

绿色知识管理对环境绩效的中介和调节作用:来自埃塞俄比亚工业园区的证据
本研究以资源基础观(RBV)、知识基础观(KBV)和制度理论(IT)为基础,探讨了新兴经济体背景下绿色产品和工艺创新如何作为绿色知识管理(GKM)和环境绩效(EP)之间的联系机制。该研究还考察了环境监管(ER)如何作为边界条件。为了实现这一目标,本研究利用来自埃塞俄比亚工业园区企业331名管理层员工的横断面调查数据,开发并检验了中介和调节模型。采用基于协方差的结构方程模型(CB-SEM)和AMOS进行关系检验。研究结果表明,绿色知识管理对绿色产品创新(GPtI)、绿色工艺创新(GPcI)和环境效益有显著的直接影响。此外,GPcI部分介导GKM和EP之间的关系,而GPtI没有。最后,ER对GKM和EP之间的关系没有显著的调节作用。这些发现有助于完善GKM通过将GI分解为产品和过程维度来增强EP的机制,并检查ER在RBV、KBV和IT框架中的条件作用。研究结果为管理者和政策制定者提供了具体的、可操作的见解,强调了GPcI相对于GPtI的更强作用,以及GKM和GPcI在提高经济效益方面的互补效益,同时表明了ER的作用有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Business Strategy and Development
Business Strategy and Development Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
33
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书