NICU Nurses' Attitudes Toward Adopting an Evidence-Based Practice Intervention to Improve Bone Mineralization in Preterm Infants.

IF 1.6
Idamis Melendez Vassall, Jennifer Emilie Mannino, Pamela Watters, Shahana Perveen
{"title":"NICU Nurses' Attitudes Toward Adopting an Evidence-Based Practice Intervention to Improve Bone Mineralization in Preterm Infants.","authors":"Idamis Melendez Vassall, Jennifer Emilie Mannino, Pamela Watters, Shahana Perveen","doi":"10.1097/ANC.0000000000001397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Metabolic bone disease (MBD) is a disorder affecting bone mineralization that leads to short and long-term consequences. A daily exercise regimen consisting of passive range of motion (ROM) and gentle compression of upper and lower extremities shows promising results in improving bone mineralization in preterm infants. However, the lack of nursing literature suggests that nurses may underutilize these interventions.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study examined Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) nurses' attitudes toward adopting passive ROM and gentle compression to improve bone mineralization in preterm infants and explored whether knowledge of MBD influences the implementation of these practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quantitative, descriptive, cross-sectional survey of 238 NICU nurses was conducted. The Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale (EBPAS) assessed attitudes toward evidence-based interventions. Additional questions evaluated nurses' knowledge of MBD and their use of passive ROM and gentle compression in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results showed favorable attitudes toward evidence-based practice (EBPAS M = 2.92, SD = 0.565). In this sample, 23.1% of nurses reported routinely performing passive ROM, and 7.2% reported performing gentle compression of upper and lower extremities. The EBPAS demonstrated high reliability (α = 0.884) and strong convergent validity (r = 0.633). No significant differences were found by years of experience (P = .55) or certification (P = .39). Over half of respondents lacked knowledge about MBD etiology (53.4%) and prevention/treatment (59.7%).</p><p><strong>Implications for practice and research: </strong>Findings highlight a knowledge gap despite positive attitudes. Incorporating MBD education and exercise techniques into NICU training may help standardize these evidence-based interventions and improve outcomes for preterm infants.</p>","PeriodicalId":520547,"journal":{"name":"Advances in neonatal care : official journal of the National Association of Neonatal Nurses","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in neonatal care : official journal of the National Association of Neonatal Nurses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ANC.0000000000001397","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Metabolic bone disease (MBD) is a disorder affecting bone mineralization that leads to short and long-term consequences. A daily exercise regimen consisting of passive range of motion (ROM) and gentle compression of upper and lower extremities shows promising results in improving bone mineralization in preterm infants. However, the lack of nursing literature suggests that nurses may underutilize these interventions.

Purpose: This study examined Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) nurses' attitudes toward adopting passive ROM and gentle compression to improve bone mineralization in preterm infants and explored whether knowledge of MBD influences the implementation of these practices.

Methods: A quantitative, descriptive, cross-sectional survey of 238 NICU nurses was conducted. The Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale (EBPAS) assessed attitudes toward evidence-based interventions. Additional questions evaluated nurses' knowledge of MBD and their use of passive ROM and gentle compression in clinical practice.

Results: Results showed favorable attitudes toward evidence-based practice (EBPAS M = 2.92, SD = 0.565). In this sample, 23.1% of nurses reported routinely performing passive ROM, and 7.2% reported performing gentle compression of upper and lower extremities. The EBPAS demonstrated high reliability (α = 0.884) and strong convergent validity (r = 0.633). No significant differences were found by years of experience (P = .55) or certification (P = .39). Over half of respondents lacked knowledge about MBD etiology (53.4%) and prevention/treatment (59.7%).

Implications for practice and research: Findings highlight a knowledge gap despite positive attitudes. Incorporating MBD education and exercise techniques into NICU training may help standardize these evidence-based interventions and improve outcomes for preterm infants.

NICU护士对采用循证实践干预改善早产儿骨矿化的态度
背景:代谢性骨病(MBD)是一种影响骨矿化的疾病,可导致短期和长期后果。由被动活动范围(ROM)和轻微压迫上肢和下肢组成的日常运动方案在改善早产儿骨矿化方面显示出有希望的结果。然而,缺乏护理文献表明,护士可能没有充分利用这些干预措施。目的:本研究调查了新生儿重症监护室(NICU)护士对采用被动ROM和温和压迫来改善早产儿骨矿化的态度,并探讨MBD知识是否会影响这些做法的实施。方法:对238名新生儿重症监护病房护士进行定量、描述性、横断面调查。循证实践态度量表(EBPAS)评估对循证干预的态度。其他问题评估了护士对MBD的知识,以及他们在临床实践中被动ROM和温和压迫的使用。结果:受访患者对循证医疗持良好态度(EBPAS M = 2.92, SD = 0.565)。在这个样本中,23.1%的护士报告常规进行被动ROM, 7.2%的护士报告进行上肢和下肢轻度压迫。该量表具有较高的信度(α = 0.884)和较强的收敛效度(r = 0.633)。经验年数(P = 0.55)和证书(P = 0.39)无显著差异。超过一半的受访者缺乏MBD病因(53.4%)和预防/治疗(59.7%)的知识。对实践和研究的启示:尽管态度积极,但研究结果突出了知识差距。将MBD教育和运动技术纳入新生儿重症监护病房的培训可能有助于标准化这些基于证据的干预措施,并改善早产儿的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书