Development and validation of solomon's socioeconomic status index (SESI): a multidimensional household classification tool for South Asia.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Sheikh Mohd Saleem, Shah Sumaya Jan
{"title":"Development and validation of solomon's socioeconomic status index (SESI): a multidimensional household classification tool for South Asia.","authors":"Sheikh Mohd Saleem, Shah Sumaya Jan","doi":"10.1007/s10198-026-01959-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Existing socioeconomic status (SES) scales in India are limited by outdated income categories, urban-centric assumptions, and unidimensional frameworks that inadequately capture contemporary socioeconomic realities. This study aimed to develop and validate a theoretically grounded, multidimensional SES assessment tool suitable for Indian settings with potential relevance for South Asia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted to design and validate Solomon's Socioeconomic Status Index (SESI). Scale development was informed by literature review, expert consultation, and focus group discussions. SESI comprises nine weighted dimensions: education (15%), occupation (15%), housing quality (20%), land ownership (10%), vehicle ownership (10%), business ownership (10%), durable assets (10%), locality type (5%), and digital access (5%). The tool was administered to 1,247 households across diverse geographic regions of India. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha and split-half methods, while validity was evaluated using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses and correlations with established SES scales.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SESI demonstrated strong internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.84) and high test-retest reliability (r = 0.89, p < 0.001). Exploratory factor analysis identified a three-factor structure explaining 68.3% of variance, supported by confirmatory factor analysis (CFI = 0.94, RMSEA = 0.051). SESI showed significant correlations with the Modified Kuppuswamy Scale (r = 0.72) and BG Prasad Scale (r = 0.68), indicating good convergent validity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SESI provides a reliable and theoretically informed multidimensional measure of socioeconomic status that captures both traditional and emerging determinants, including digital access. It offers improved precision for socioeconomic classification in health research and policy, with potential applicability to South Asian contexts subject to further validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":51416,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Health Economics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Health Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-026-01959-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Existing socioeconomic status (SES) scales in India are limited by outdated income categories, urban-centric assumptions, and unidimensional frameworks that inadequately capture contemporary socioeconomic realities. This study aimed to develop and validate a theoretically grounded, multidimensional SES assessment tool suitable for Indian settings with potential relevance for South Asia.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted to design and validate Solomon's Socioeconomic Status Index (SESI). Scale development was informed by literature review, expert consultation, and focus group discussions. SESI comprises nine weighted dimensions: education (15%), occupation (15%), housing quality (20%), land ownership (10%), vehicle ownership (10%), business ownership (10%), durable assets (10%), locality type (5%), and digital access (5%). The tool was administered to 1,247 households across diverse geographic regions of India. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha and split-half methods, while validity was evaluated using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses and correlations with established SES scales.

Results: SESI demonstrated strong internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.84) and high test-retest reliability (r = 0.89, p < 0.001). Exploratory factor analysis identified a three-factor structure explaining 68.3% of variance, supported by confirmatory factor analysis (CFI = 0.94, RMSEA = 0.051). SESI showed significant correlations with the Modified Kuppuswamy Scale (r = 0.72) and BG Prasad Scale (r = 0.68), indicating good convergent validity.

Conclusion: SESI provides a reliable and theoretically informed multidimensional measure of socioeconomic status that captures both traditional and emerging determinants, including digital access. It offers improved precision for socioeconomic classification in health research and policy, with potential applicability to South Asian contexts subject to further validation.

所罗门社会经济地位指数(SESI)的发展和验证:南亚多维家庭分类工具。
背景:印度现有的社会经济地位(SES)量表受到过时的收入类别、以城市为中心的假设以及无法充分反映当代社会经济现实的单维框架的限制。这项研究旨在开发和验证一种具有理论基础的多维社会经济地位评估工具,该工具适合于印度的环境,并可能与南亚相关。方法:采用横断面研究设计并验证所罗门社会经济地位指数(SESI)。量表的制定是通过文献回顾、专家咨询和焦点小组讨论来进行的。SESI包括9个加权维度:教育(15%)、职业(15%)、住房质量(20%)、土地所有权(10%)、车辆所有权(10%)、企业所有权(10%)、耐用资产(10%)、地点类型(5%)和数字访问(5%)。该工具对印度不同地理区域的1247个家庭进行了管理。信度采用Cronbach's alpha和split-half方法进行评估,效度采用探索性和验证性因素分析以及与既定SES量表的相关性进行评估。结果:SESI具有较强的内部一致性(Cronbach’s α = 0.84)和较高的重测信度(r = 0.89, p < 0.001)。探索性因子分析发现三因素结构解释68.3%的方差,验证性因子分析支持(CFI = 0.94, RMSEA = 0.051)。SESI与修正Kuppuswamy量表(r = 0.72)和BG Prasad量表(r = 0.68)呈显著相关,具有较好的收敛效度。结论:SESI提供了一个可靠的、理论上知情的多维社会经济地位衡量标准,涵盖了传统和新兴的决定因素,包括数字访问。它为卫生研究和政策中的社会经济分类提供了更高的准确性,可能适用于南亚地区,但有待进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.30%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Health Economics is a journal of Health Economics and associated disciplines. The growing demand for health economics and the introduction of new guidelines in various European countries were the motivation to generate a highly scientific and at the same time practice oriented journal considering the requirements of various health care systems in Europe. The international scientific board of opinion leaders guarantees high-quality, peer-reviewed publications as well as articles for pragmatic approaches in the field of health economics. We intend to cover all aspects of health economics: • Basics of health economic approaches and methods • Pharmacoeconomics • Health Care Systems • Pricing and Reimbursement Systems • Quality-of-Life-Studies The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. The author will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfill the above-mentioned requirements. Officially cited as: Eur J Health Econ
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书