Managing Emotion in Clinical Supervision Through Oller-Vallejo's Model of Ego States.

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-27 DOI:10.1111/jpm.70161
Paul Linsley, John Hurley
{"title":"Managing Emotion in Clinical Supervision Through Oller-Vallejo's Model of Ego States.","authors":"Paul Linsley, John Hurley","doi":"10.1111/jpm.70161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This paper examines the value of Oller-Vallejo's (2001) ego state model as a framework for understanding emotional dynamics in mental health nursing clinical supervision, and its integration with Proctor's (1986) model of supervision.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Mental health nursing is characterised by high emotional demand, relational complexity and exposure to psychological distress. Clinical supervision is increasingly recognised as essential for supporting emotional well-being, professional development and safe practice. However, there remains a need for more psychologically informed frameworks to better understand the emotional processes occurring within supervisory relationships.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This paper adopts a conceptual, theory-informed approach, drawing on published literature relating to ego state theory and clinical supervision models. A narrative synthesis is used to explore how these frameworks can be integrated to enhance understanding of emotional processes in supervision.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The ego state concepts of caregiving, caregetting and individuating are used to explore emotional roles and relational dynamics within supervision. These are considered alongside Proctor's (1986) restorative, formative and normative functions of supervision. The integration of these models provides a structured way to understand emotional containment, dependency, autonomy and professional development within supervisory relationships in mental health nursing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The paper proposes that combining ego state theory with established supervision models offers a psychologically informed framework for enhancing clinical supervision. This has implications for supporting emotional resilience, improving reflective practice and strengthening workforce well-being and sustainability in mental health nursing.</p>","PeriodicalId":50076,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"898-906"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13551198/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jpm.70161","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This paper examines the value of Oller-Vallejo's (2001) ego state model as a framework for understanding emotional dynamics in mental health nursing clinical supervision, and its integration with Proctor's (1986) model of supervision.

Background: Mental health nursing is characterised by high emotional demand, relational complexity and exposure to psychological distress. Clinical supervision is increasingly recognised as essential for supporting emotional well-being, professional development and safe practice. However, there remains a need for more psychologically informed frameworks to better understand the emotional processes occurring within supervisory relationships.

Method: This paper adopts a conceptual, theory-informed approach, drawing on published literature relating to ego state theory and clinical supervision models. A narrative synthesis is used to explore how these frameworks can be integrated to enhance understanding of emotional processes in supervision.

Discussion: The ego state concepts of caregiving, caregetting and individuating are used to explore emotional roles and relational dynamics within supervision. These are considered alongside Proctor's (1986) restorative, formative and normative functions of supervision. The integration of these models provides a structured way to understand emotional containment, dependency, autonomy and professional development within supervisory relationships in mental health nursing.

Conclusion: The paper proposes that combining ego state theory with established supervision models offers a psychologically informed framework for enhancing clinical supervision. This has implications for supporting emotional resilience, improving reflective practice and strengthening workforce well-being and sustainability in mental health nursing.

用奥勒-瓦列霍自我状态模型管理临床监督中的情绪。
目的:探讨Oller-Vallejo(2001)的自我状态模型作为理解心理健康护理临床监督中情绪动态的框架的价值,并将其与Proctor(1986)的监督模型进行整合。背景:心理健康护理的特点是高情感需求、关系复杂和暴露于心理困扰。临床监督越来越被认为是支持情感健康、专业发展和安全实践的必要条件。然而,仍然需要更多的心理知情框架来更好地理解在监督关系中发生的情感过程。方法:本文采用概念性、理论性的方法,借鉴已发表的有关自我状态理论和临床监督模型的文献。本文采用叙事综合的方法来探讨如何将这些框架整合起来,以增强对监督中情绪过程的理解。讨论:运用照顾、照顾和个性化的自我状态概念来探讨监督中的情感角色和关系动态。这些都被认为是与Proctor(1986)的恢复性,形成性和规范性的监督功能。这些模型的整合提供了一种结构化的方式来理解心理健康护理中监督关系中的情感遏制、依赖、自主和专业发展。结论:将自我状态理论与已建立的监督模型相结合,为加强临床监督提供了一个心理知情的框架。这对支持情绪弹性、改进反思实践和加强劳动力福祉和精神卫生护理的可持续性具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
75
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing is an international journal which publishes research and scholarly papers that advance the development of policy, practice, research and education in all aspects of mental health nursing. We publish rigorously conducted research, literature reviews, essays and debates, and consumer practitioner narratives; all of which add new knowledge and advance practice globally. All papers must have clear implications for mental health nursing either solely or part of multidisciplinary practice. Papers are welcomed which draw on single or multiple research and academic disciplines. We give space to practitioner and consumer perspectives and ensure research published in the journal can be understood by a wide audience. We encourage critical debate and exchange of ideas and therefore welcome letters to the editor and essays and debates in mental health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书