AI-assisted digital breast tomosynthesis as a decision-support tool for post-neoadjuvant surgical planning in breast cancer.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Adnan Gündoğdu, Nur Betül Ünal Özdemir, Ceyda Sönmez Wetherilt, Merve Aktaş, Damiano Gentile, Bülent Çomçalı, Osman Cem Yılmaz
{"title":"AI-assisted digital breast tomosynthesis as a decision-support tool for post-neoadjuvant surgical planning in breast cancer.","authors":"Adnan Gündoğdu, Nur Betül Ünal Özdemir, Ceyda Sönmez Wetherilt, Merve Aktaş, Damiano Gentile, Bülent Çomçalı, Osman Cem Yılmaz","doi":"10.1007/s00423-026-04116-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Accurate assessment of residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is essential for surgical planning and prevention of incomplete excision. This study evaluated artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) as a decision-support tool for post-NAC assessment in breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 151 patients treated with NAC followed by surgery. Post-NAC DBT images were analyzed using Lunit INSIGHT DBT. An AI score threshold of 70 was used to classify patients as having low (< 70) or high (≥ 70) scores. In a paired subgroup of 70 patients, pre- and post-NAC AI scores were compared. Diagnostic performance and univariable and multivariable analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall pathological complete response (pCR) rate was 41.1% (62/151). Patients with low AI scores had higher pCR rates than those with high scores (49.5% vs. 28.3%, p = 0.010). High AI scores were associated with persistent microcalcifications and residual ductal carcinoma in situ (p < 0.001). Overall accuracy was 58.3% and varied by molecular subtype, with higher performance in triple-negative breast cancer and limited discrimination in HR+/HER2 - tumors. In multivariable analysis, AI score showed borderline significance (p = 0.070). In the paired cohort, AI scores decreased after NAC (p < 0.001), but delta change did not differ between pCR and non-pCR groups (p = 0.877).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AI-assisted DBT may have potential complementary value as a decision-support tool for post-NAC surgical planning, particularly in triple-negative breast cancer and in cases with residual microcalcifications.</p>","PeriodicalId":17983,"journal":{"name":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13572336/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-026-04116-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Accurate assessment of residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is essential for surgical planning and prevention of incomplete excision. This study evaluated artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) as a decision-support tool for post-NAC assessment in breast cancer.

Methods: This retrospective study included 151 patients treated with NAC followed by surgery. Post-NAC DBT images were analyzed using Lunit INSIGHT DBT. An AI score threshold of 70 was used to classify patients as having low (< 70) or high (≥ 70) scores. In a paired subgroup of 70 patients, pre- and post-NAC AI scores were compared. Diagnostic performance and univariable and multivariable analyses were performed.

Results: The overall pathological complete response (pCR) rate was 41.1% (62/151). Patients with low AI scores had higher pCR rates than those with high scores (49.5% vs. 28.3%, p = 0.010). High AI scores were associated with persistent microcalcifications and residual ductal carcinoma in situ (p < 0.001). Overall accuracy was 58.3% and varied by molecular subtype, with higher performance in triple-negative breast cancer and limited discrimination in HR+/HER2 - tumors. In multivariable analysis, AI score showed borderline significance (p = 0.070). In the paired cohort, AI scores decreased after NAC (p < 0.001), but delta change did not differ between pCR and non-pCR groups (p = 0.877).

Conclusion: AI-assisted DBT may have potential complementary value as a decision-support tool for post-NAC surgical planning, particularly in triple-negative breast cancer and in cases with residual microcalcifications.

人工智能辅助的数字乳腺断层合成作为乳腺癌新辅助后手术计划的决策支持工具。
目的:准确评估新辅助化疗(NAC)后残留病变对手术计划和预防不完全切除至关重要。本研究评估了人工智能(AI)辅助的数字乳腺断层合成(DBT)作为乳腺癌nac后评估的决策支持工具。方法:回顾性研究纳入151例NAC术后患者。使用Lunit INSIGHT DBT分析nac后DBT图像。采用AI评分阈值70分将患者分为低(结果:总体病理完全缓解(pCR)率为41.1%(62/151)。AI得分低的患者pCR率高于得分高的患者(49.5%比28.3%,p = 0.010)。结论:人工智能辅助DBT作为nac术后手术计划的决策支持工具可能具有潜在的补充价值,特别是在三阴性乳腺癌和残留微钙化的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.70%
发文量
342
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Langenbeck''s Archives of Surgery aims to publish the best results in the field of clinical surgery and basic surgical research. The main focus is on providing the highest level of clinical research and clinically relevant basic research. The journal, published exclusively in English, will provide an international discussion forum for the controlled results of clinical surgery. The majority of published contributions will be original articles reporting on clinical data from general and visceral surgery, while endocrine surgery will also be covered. Papers on basic surgical principles from the fields of traumatology, vascular and thoracic surgery are also welcome. Evidence-based medicine is an important criterion for the acceptance of papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书