Efficacy of radiation therapy plus targeted therapy with or without immunotherapy for lymph node metastases in hepatocellular carcinoma.

IF 7.8 2区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hepatology International Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-26 DOI:10.1007/s12072-026-11109-0
Li Zhang, Maopei Chen, Jing Sun, Zhaochong Zeng, Yang Zhang, Ping Yang, Yixing Chen, Shisuo Du
{"title":"Efficacy of radiation therapy plus targeted therapy with or without immunotherapy for lymph node metastases in hepatocellular carcinoma.","authors":"Li Zhang, Maopei Chen, Jing Sun, Zhaochong Zeng, Yang Zhang, Ping Yang, Yixing Chen, Shisuo Du","doi":"10.1007/s12072-026-11109-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of radiation therapy and targeted therapy combined with or without immunotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with lymph node metastases (LNM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 132 HCC patients with LNM were enrolled in this study. Propensity score matching (PSM) and stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (sIPTW) were used to balance baseline variables between groups. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and clinical safety were compared between the two treatment arms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 61 patients in radiotherapy plus targeted therapy (RT) group, and 71 patients in radiation therapy, targeted therapy combined with immunotherapy (RTI) group. In the overall cohort, the median OS was 12.8 months in the RT group and 18.8 months in the RTI group (p = 0.003). Multivariate analysis identified that tumor thrombus status, distant metastasis, lymph node (LN) number, LN size and immunotherapy were independent prognostic factors for survival. Median PFS was 7.0 months in the RT group and 11.9 months in the RTI group (p = 0.001). The ORRs were 70.5% for the RT group and 85.9% for the RTI group in the total cohort (p = 0.031). After PSM and IPTW adjustment, ORR remained significantly higher in the RTI group (PSM: 88.9% vs. 68.9%, p = 0.020; IPTW: 86.8% vs. 71.5%, p = 0.033). The incidence of treatment-related adverse events was similar in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings of this study suggest that RTI provides superior treatment responses and survival outcomes compared to RT in HCC patients with LNM, while maintaining a comparable safety profile.</p>","PeriodicalId":12901,"journal":{"name":"Hepatology International","volume":" ","pages":"1177-1192"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hepatology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-026-11109-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of radiation therapy and targeted therapy combined with or without immunotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with lymph node metastases (LNM).

Methods: A total of 132 HCC patients with LNM were enrolled in this study. Propensity score matching (PSM) and stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (sIPTW) were used to balance baseline variables between groups. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and clinical safety were compared between the two treatment arms.

Results: There were 61 patients in radiotherapy plus targeted therapy (RT) group, and 71 patients in radiation therapy, targeted therapy combined with immunotherapy (RTI) group. In the overall cohort, the median OS was 12.8 months in the RT group and 18.8 months in the RTI group (p = 0.003). Multivariate analysis identified that tumor thrombus status, distant metastasis, lymph node (LN) number, LN size and immunotherapy were independent prognostic factors for survival. Median PFS was 7.0 months in the RT group and 11.9 months in the RTI group (p = 0.001). The ORRs were 70.5% for the RT group and 85.9% for the RTI group in the total cohort (p = 0.031). After PSM and IPTW adjustment, ORR remained significantly higher in the RTI group (PSM: 88.9% vs. 68.9%, p = 0.020; IPTW: 86.8% vs. 71.5%, p = 0.033). The incidence of treatment-related adverse events was similar in both groups.

Conclusions: The findings of this study suggest that RTI provides superior treatment responses and survival outcomes compared to RT in HCC patients with LNM, while maintaining a comparable safety profile.

放疗加靶向治疗伴或不伴免疫治疗治疗肝细胞癌淋巴结转移的疗效。
背景与目的:本研究旨在探讨放射治疗和靶向治疗联合免疫治疗或不联合免疫治疗对肝细胞癌(HCC)伴淋巴结转移(LNM)患者的疗效。方法:本研究共纳入132例肝细胞癌合并LNM患者。使用倾向评分匹配(PSM)和稳定逆概率处理加权(sIPTW)来平衡组间基线变量。比较两个治疗组的总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)、客观缓解率(ORR)、疾病控制率(DCR)和临床安全性。结果:放疗加靶向治疗(RT)组61例,放疗、靶向治疗联合免疫治疗(RTI)组71例。在整个队列中,RT组的中位OS为12.8个月,RTI组的中位OS为18.8个月(p = 0.003)。多因素分析发现,肿瘤血栓状态、远处转移、淋巴结数量、淋巴结大小和免疫治疗是影响生存的独立预后因素。中位PFS在RT组为7.0个月,在RTI组为11.9个月(p = 0.001)。在整个队列中,RTI组的orr为70.5%,RTI组为85.9% (p = 0.031)。调整PSM和IPTW后,RTI组的ORR仍显著高于PSM组(PSM: 88.9%比68.9%,p = 0.020; IPTW: 86.8%比71.5%,p = 0.033)。两组治疗相关不良事件的发生率相似。结论:本研究结果表明,与肝癌合并LNM患者相比,RTI提供了更好的治疗反应和生存结果,同时保持了相当的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hepatology International
Hepatology International 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
3.00%
发文量
167
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Hepatology International is the official journal of the Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL). This is a peer-reviewed journal featuring articles written by clinicians, clinical researchers and basic scientists is dedicated to research and patient care issues in hepatology. This journal will focus mainly on new and emerging technologies, cutting-edge science and advances in liver and biliary disorders. Types of articles published: -Original Research Articles related to clinical care and basic research -Review Articles -Consensus guidelines for diagnosis and treatment -Clinical cases, images -Selected Author Summaries -Video Submissions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书