Drain management after pancreatoduodenectomy: risk-stratified dynamic algorithm.

IF 4.9 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
BJS Open Pub Date : 2026-05-12 DOI:10.1093/bjsopen/zrag068
Giampaolo Perri, Elisa Bannone, Isabella Frigerio, Riccardo Pellegrini, Martina Guerra, Roberta Vella, Alice Cattelani, Elvira Adinolfi, Umberto Cillo, Giovanni Butturini, Giovanni Marchegiani
{"title":"Drain management after pancreatoduodenectomy: risk-stratified dynamic algorithm.","authors":"Giampaolo Perri, Elisa Bannone, Isabella Frigerio, Riccardo Pellegrini, Martina Guerra, Roberta Vella, Alice Cattelani, Elvira Adinolfi, Umberto Cillo, Giovanni Butturini, Giovanni Marchegiani","doi":"10.1093/bjsopen/zrag068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The ability of drain fluid amylase (DFA) to predict pancreatic fistula (POPF) and safely guide early drain removal is unknown in high-risk pancreatoduodenectomy (HR-PD). The aim of this analysis was to develop a new risk-based algorithm for drain management after pancreatoduodenectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All consecutive patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy (2019-2024) at two institutions were included. During surgery, patients were stratified into HR-PD, defined according to the International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery score (soft gland and duct ≤ 3 mm), and non-HR-PD. Postoperative predictors (DFA, serum amylase/lipase, C-reactive protein) were retrieved on postoperative days (PODs) 1 to 5 and correlated to POPF development using a risk-based approach. Results were validated in a retrospective cohort (2015-2019) of pancreatoduodenectomies performed at the same institutions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 825 screened patients, 788 were included. HR-PD (251, 32%) had higher POPF rates (50% versus 9%; P < 0.001) and worse outcomes. In HR-PD, DFA had a lower area under the curve for POPF for POD 1 (0.73 versus 0.85; P = 0.003) and POD 3 (0.74 versus 0.88; P = 0.002) compared with non-HR-PD, but similar for POD 5 (0.83 versus 0.86; P = 0.535), whereas serum amylase/lipase maintained a low area under the curve for POPF compared with non-HR-PD. The optimal criteria for POD 3 drain removal in non-HR-PD were POD 1 DFA < 200 UI/l, POD 3 DFA < 150 UI/l, and absence of elevated serum amylase/lipase on POD 1 (Youden's index 0.674). In HR-PD, the criteria for POD 5 drain removal were POD 5 DFA < 150 UI/l and POD 5 C-reactive protein < 150 mg/ml (Youden's index 0.593).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with an intrinsic higher risk of POPF, early predictors are less reliable, and drain management protocols should be tailored. In non-HR-PD, an early removal policy can be recommended based on DFA and serum amylase/lipase. In HR-PD, drain removal may be safely deferred until POD 5 according to DFA and C-reactive protein.</p>","PeriodicalId":9028,"journal":{"name":"BJS Open","volume":"10 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13308533/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJS Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrag068","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The ability of drain fluid amylase (DFA) to predict pancreatic fistula (POPF) and safely guide early drain removal is unknown in high-risk pancreatoduodenectomy (HR-PD). The aim of this analysis was to develop a new risk-based algorithm for drain management after pancreatoduodenectomy.

Methods: All consecutive patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy (2019-2024) at two institutions were included. During surgery, patients were stratified into HR-PD, defined according to the International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery score (soft gland and duct ≤ 3 mm), and non-HR-PD. Postoperative predictors (DFA, serum amylase/lipase, C-reactive protein) were retrieved on postoperative days (PODs) 1 to 5 and correlated to POPF development using a risk-based approach. Results were validated in a retrospective cohort (2015-2019) of pancreatoduodenectomies performed at the same institutions.

Results: Out of 825 screened patients, 788 were included. HR-PD (251, 32%) had higher POPF rates (50% versus 9%; P < 0.001) and worse outcomes. In HR-PD, DFA had a lower area under the curve for POPF for POD 1 (0.73 versus 0.85; P = 0.003) and POD 3 (0.74 versus 0.88; P = 0.002) compared with non-HR-PD, but similar for POD 5 (0.83 versus 0.86; P = 0.535), whereas serum amylase/lipase maintained a low area under the curve for POPF compared with non-HR-PD. The optimal criteria for POD 3 drain removal in non-HR-PD were POD 1 DFA < 200 UI/l, POD 3 DFA < 150 UI/l, and absence of elevated serum amylase/lipase on POD 1 (Youden's index 0.674). In HR-PD, the criteria for POD 5 drain removal were POD 5 DFA < 150 UI/l and POD 5 C-reactive protein < 150 mg/ml (Youden's index 0.593).

Conclusion: In patients with an intrinsic higher risk of POPF, early predictors are less reliable, and drain management protocols should be tailored. In non-HR-PD, an early removal policy can be recommended based on DFA and serum amylase/lipase. In HR-PD, drain removal may be safely deferred until POD 5 according to DFA and C-reactive protein.

胰十二指肠切除术后引流管理:风险分层动态算法。
背景:在高危胰十二指肠切除术(HR-PD)中,引流液淀粉酶(DFA)预测胰瘘(POPF)和安全指导早期引流的能力尚不清楚。本分析的目的是开发一种新的基于风险的胰十二指肠切除术后引流管理算法。方法:纳入两所医院2019-2024年连续行胰十二指肠切除术的患者。手术期间,根据国际胰腺外科研究组评分(软腺和导管≤3mm)将患者分为HR-PD和非HR-PD。术后预测指标(DFA、血清淀粉酶/脂肪酶、c反应蛋白)在术后第1至5天(PODs)被提取,并使用基于风险的方法与POPF的发展相关。在同一机构进行的胰十二指肠切除术的回顾性队列(2015-2019)中验证了结果。结果:825例筛查患者中,788例纳入。HR-PD(251, 32%)有较高的POPF率(50%对9%,P < 0.001)和较差的预后。在HR-PD中,与非HR-PD相比,DFA对于POD 1 (0.73 vs 0.85; P = 0.003)和POD 3 (0.74 vs 0.88; P = 0.002)的POPF曲线下面积较低,但对于POD 5 (0.83 vs 0.86; P = 0.535)相似,而血清淀粉酶/脂肪酶对于POPF曲线下面积与非HR-PD相比保持较低。非hr - pd患者去除POD 3的最佳标准为POD 1 DFA < 200 UI/l, POD 3 DFA < 150 UI/l,且无血清淀粉酶/脂肪酶升高(约登指数0.674)。HR-PD中,以POD 5 DFA < 150 UI/l、POD 5 c反应蛋白< 150 mg/ml(约登指数0.593)为去除标准。结论:对于固有较高POPF风险的患者,早期预测不太可靠,应量身定制引流管理方案。对于非hr - pd,可以根据DFA和血清淀粉酶/脂肪酶推荐早期切除策略。在HR-PD中,根据DFA和c反应蛋白的变化,排水管清除可以安全地推迟到POD 5。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJS Open
BJS Open SURGERY-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.20%
发文量
144
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书