Rank and payoff biases influence subject choices in a foraging task among sanctuary chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes)

IF 2.3 2区 生物学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Animal Cognition Pub Date : 2026-06-26 Epub Date: 2026-09-17 DOI:10.1007/s10071-026-02079-9
Eloise Pedersen, Craig B. Stanford
{"title":"Rank and payoff biases influence subject choices in a foraging task among sanctuary chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes)","authors":"Eloise Pedersen,&nbsp;Craig B. Stanford","doi":"10.1007/s10071-026-02079-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Social learning is essential to the development of culture in humans, non-human primates, and other cultural species. Transmission biases (social learning strategies), the cognitive processes that guide conscious and subconscious decisions about when and from whom to learn, are a key branch of social learning. Primatological research has primarily explored single biases in isolation, such as chimpanzee bias toward adopting behavior demonstrated by higher-ranking individuals. However, few studies have considered how simultaneous strategies interact when subjects are given a conflicting choice involving two potentially adaptive biases. This study used a token-reward task with 35 sanctuary-housed chimpanzees at Ngamba Island Sanctuary in Uganda to determine whether chimpanzees more frequently adopt behaviors from high- or low-ranking female demonstrators when those behaviors differ in payoff, providing either a preferred pineapple piece (high-payoff) or a less favored carrot piece (low-payoff). Individuals in Group 1 observed a low-ranking demonstrator collecting the high-payoff reward (pineapple) and a high-ranking demonstrator collecting the low-payoff reward (carrot). Chimpanzees in Group 1 did not adopt one behavior significantly more frequently than the other. In Group 2, the demonstrator roles were reversed, and the frequency of high-payoff selection was higher. This suggests that high-payoff behaviors are more likely to propagate when presented by higher-ranking demonstrators. Additionally, adoption of high-payoff behaviors may be constrained by the presence of alternative, lower-payoff behaviors demonstrated by socially preferred individuals. In turn, this may contribute to explanations of why chimpanzee culture is relatively simple compared to that of humans.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7879,"journal":{"name":"Animal Cognition","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10071-026-02079-9.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10071-026-02079-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social learning is essential to the development of culture in humans, non-human primates, and other cultural species. Transmission biases (social learning strategies), the cognitive processes that guide conscious and subconscious decisions about when and from whom to learn, are a key branch of social learning. Primatological research has primarily explored single biases in isolation, such as chimpanzee bias toward adopting behavior demonstrated by higher-ranking individuals. However, few studies have considered how simultaneous strategies interact when subjects are given a conflicting choice involving two potentially adaptive biases. This study used a token-reward task with 35 sanctuary-housed chimpanzees at Ngamba Island Sanctuary in Uganda to determine whether chimpanzees more frequently adopt behaviors from high- or low-ranking female demonstrators when those behaviors differ in payoff, providing either a preferred pineapple piece (high-payoff) or a less favored carrot piece (low-payoff). Individuals in Group 1 observed a low-ranking demonstrator collecting the high-payoff reward (pineapple) and a high-ranking demonstrator collecting the low-payoff reward (carrot). Chimpanzees in Group 1 did not adopt one behavior significantly more frequently than the other. In Group 2, the demonstrator roles were reversed, and the frequency of high-payoff selection was higher. This suggests that high-payoff behaviors are more likely to propagate when presented by higher-ranking demonstrators. Additionally, adoption of high-payoff behaviors may be constrained by the presence of alternative, lower-payoff behaviors demonstrated by socially preferred individuals. In turn, this may contribute to explanations of why chimpanzee culture is relatively simple compared to that of humans.

等级和回报偏差影响保护区黑猩猩觅食任务中的主体选择。
社会学习对人类、非人类灵长类动物和其他文化物种的文化发展至关重要。传递偏差(社会学习策略)是社会学习的一个关键分支,它是指导有意识和潜意识地决定何时和向谁学习的认知过程。灵长类动物学的研究主要是孤立地探索单一的偏见,比如黑猩猩倾向于采用高级个体表现出的行为。然而,很少有研究考虑了当受试者被给予涉及两种潜在适应性偏见的冲突选择时,同时策略是如何相互作用的。这项研究对乌干达恩甘巴岛保护区的35只黑猩猩进行了一项象征性奖励任务,以确定黑猩猩是否更频繁地采取来自高级别或低级别雌性示威者的行为,当这些行为的回报不同时,提供更喜欢的菠萝块(高回报)或不太喜欢的胡萝卜块(低回报)。第1组的个体观察到一个低等级的演示者收集高回报的奖励(菠萝),一个高等级的演示者收集低回报的奖励(胡萝卜)。第一组的黑猩猩采用一种行为的频率并没有明显高于另一种。在第二组,示范者的角色被颠倒,高收益选择的频率更高。这表明,高回报行为在由更高级别的示范者呈现时更有可能传播。此外,高回报行为的采用可能会受到社会偏好个体所表现出的其他低回报行为的限制。反过来,这可能有助于解释为什么与人类相比,黑猩猩的文化相对简单。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Animal Cognition
Animal Cognition 生物-动物学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
18.50%
发文量
125
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Animal Cognition is an interdisciplinary journal offering current research from many disciplines (ethology, behavioral ecology, animal behavior and learning, cognitive sciences, comparative psychology and evolutionary psychology) on all aspects of animal (and human) cognition in an evolutionary framework. Animal Cognition publishes original empirical and theoretical work, reviews, methods papers, short communications and correspondence on the mechanisms and evolution of biologically rooted cognitive-intellectual structures. The journal explores animal time perception and use; causality detection; innate reaction patterns and innate bases of learning; numerical competence and frequency expectancies; symbol use; communication; problem solving, animal thinking and use of tools, and the modularity of the mind.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书