Pauline Neuranter, Jeanne Beirnaert, Morgan Roupret, Ugo Pinar
{"title":"Long-term satisfaction and outcomes after inflatable penile prosthesis implantation: A single-center study using the SSIPI Questionnaire.","authors":"Pauline Neuranter, Jeanne Beirnaert, Morgan Roupret, Ugo Pinar","doi":"10.1016/j.fjurol.2026.103153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Erectile dysfunction (ED) significantly impacts quality of life. While inflatable penile prosthesis (PP) implantation is the gold standard for treatment-refractory cases, assessing long-term patient satisfaction remains a challenge due to the subjective nature of outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate long-term satisfaction following IPP implantation using the validated French version of the Satisfaction Survey for Inflatable Penile Implant (SSIPI), while assessing perioperative outcomes and long-term device survival.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This retrospective single-center study included all consecutive patients who underwent IPP implantation during 10years. Patient satisfaction was assessed via telephone interviews using the SSIPI questionnaire. Revision-free and removal-free survival were analyzed. Complications were classified according to the EAU Intraoperative Adverse Incident and Clavien-Dindo classifications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 201 patients were included (median age 63.3years). Among them, 89 (44.3%) completed the SSIPI questionnaire. The median SSIPI score was 67 [59-73], with 88.7% of patients classified as satisfied and 58.4% as highly satisfied. No significant predictors of satisfaction were identified. The overall postoperative complication rate was 16.9%, with 3% requiring surgical revision within 30days. During follow-up, 30.3% of patients underwent surgical revision, including 10.9% device removal. Revision-free survival at 60months was 61.7%, and device survival without removal was 83.6%. A history of prior PP implantation was the only significant risk factor for revision and removal.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IPP implantation provides high patient satisfaction. Outcomes are multifactorial and cannot be explained solely by surgical success. Identifying predictors of dissatisfaction is essential to optimize long-term patient management.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: 4: </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":516865,"journal":{"name":"The French journal of urology","volume":" ","pages":"103153"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The French journal of urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fjurol.2026.103153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Erectile dysfunction (ED) significantly impacts quality of life. While inflatable penile prosthesis (PP) implantation is the gold standard for treatment-refractory cases, assessing long-term patient satisfaction remains a challenge due to the subjective nature of outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate long-term satisfaction following IPP implantation using the validated French version of the Satisfaction Survey for Inflatable Penile Implant (SSIPI), while assessing perioperative outcomes and long-term device survival.
Patients and methods: This retrospective single-center study included all consecutive patients who underwent IPP implantation during 10years. Patient satisfaction was assessed via telephone interviews using the SSIPI questionnaire. Revision-free and removal-free survival were analyzed. Complications were classified according to the EAU Intraoperative Adverse Incident and Clavien-Dindo classifications.
Results: A total of 201 patients were included (median age 63.3years). Among them, 89 (44.3%) completed the SSIPI questionnaire. The median SSIPI score was 67 [59-73], with 88.7% of patients classified as satisfied and 58.4% as highly satisfied. No significant predictors of satisfaction were identified. The overall postoperative complication rate was 16.9%, with 3% requiring surgical revision within 30days. During follow-up, 30.3% of patients underwent surgical revision, including 10.9% device removal. Revision-free survival at 60months was 61.7%, and device survival without removal was 83.6%. A history of prior PP implantation was the only significant risk factor for revision and removal.
Conclusion: IPP implantation provides high patient satisfaction. Outcomes are multifactorial and cannot be explained solely by surgical success. Identifying predictors of dissatisfaction is essential to optimize long-term patient management.