Long-term satisfaction and outcomes after inflatable penile prosthesis implantation: A single-center study using the SSIPI Questionnaire.

IF 1.2
The French journal of urology Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-25 DOI:10.1016/j.fjurol.2026.103153
Pauline Neuranter, Jeanne Beirnaert, Morgan Roupret, Ugo Pinar
{"title":"Long-term satisfaction and outcomes after inflatable penile prosthesis implantation: A single-center study using the SSIPI Questionnaire.","authors":"Pauline Neuranter, Jeanne Beirnaert, Morgan Roupret, Ugo Pinar","doi":"10.1016/j.fjurol.2026.103153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Erectile dysfunction (ED) significantly impacts quality of life. While inflatable penile prosthesis (PP) implantation is the gold standard for treatment-refractory cases, assessing long-term patient satisfaction remains a challenge due to the subjective nature of outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate long-term satisfaction following IPP implantation using the validated French version of the Satisfaction Survey for Inflatable Penile Implant (SSIPI), while assessing perioperative outcomes and long-term device survival.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This retrospective single-center study included all consecutive patients who underwent IPP implantation during 10years. Patient satisfaction was assessed via telephone interviews using the SSIPI questionnaire. Revision-free and removal-free survival were analyzed. Complications were classified according to the EAU Intraoperative Adverse Incident and Clavien-Dindo classifications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 201 patients were included (median age 63.3years). Among them, 89 (44.3%) completed the SSIPI questionnaire. The median SSIPI score was 67 [59-73], with 88.7% of patients classified as satisfied and 58.4% as highly satisfied. No significant predictors of satisfaction were identified. The overall postoperative complication rate was 16.9%, with 3% requiring surgical revision within 30days. During follow-up, 30.3% of patients underwent surgical revision, including 10.9% device removal. Revision-free survival at 60months was 61.7%, and device survival without removal was 83.6%. A history of prior PP implantation was the only significant risk factor for revision and removal.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IPP implantation provides high patient satisfaction. Outcomes are multifactorial and cannot be explained solely by surgical success. Identifying predictors of dissatisfaction is essential to optimize long-term patient management.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: 4: </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":516865,"journal":{"name":"The French journal of urology","volume":" ","pages":"103153"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The French journal of urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fjurol.2026.103153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Erectile dysfunction (ED) significantly impacts quality of life. While inflatable penile prosthesis (PP) implantation is the gold standard for treatment-refractory cases, assessing long-term patient satisfaction remains a challenge due to the subjective nature of outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate long-term satisfaction following IPP implantation using the validated French version of the Satisfaction Survey for Inflatable Penile Implant (SSIPI), while assessing perioperative outcomes and long-term device survival.

Patients and methods: This retrospective single-center study included all consecutive patients who underwent IPP implantation during 10years. Patient satisfaction was assessed via telephone interviews using the SSIPI questionnaire. Revision-free and removal-free survival were analyzed. Complications were classified according to the EAU Intraoperative Adverse Incident and Clavien-Dindo classifications.

Results: A total of 201 patients were included (median age 63.3years). Among them, 89 (44.3%) completed the SSIPI questionnaire. The median SSIPI score was 67 [59-73], with 88.7% of patients classified as satisfied and 58.4% as highly satisfied. No significant predictors of satisfaction were identified. The overall postoperative complication rate was 16.9%, with 3% requiring surgical revision within 30days. During follow-up, 30.3% of patients underwent surgical revision, including 10.9% device removal. Revision-free survival at 60months was 61.7%, and device survival without removal was 83.6%. A history of prior PP implantation was the only significant risk factor for revision and removal.

Conclusion: IPP implantation provides high patient satisfaction. Outcomes are multifactorial and cannot be explained solely by surgical success. Identifying predictors of dissatisfaction is essential to optimize long-term patient management.

Level of evidence: 4:

阴茎植入治疗勃起功能障碍的患者:满意度和长期围手术期结果的评估。
简介:勃起功能障碍(ED)显著影响生活质量。虽然充气式阴茎假体(PP)植入是治疗难治性病例的金标准,但由于结果的主观性,评估患者的长期满意度仍然是一个挑战。本研究旨在评估IPP植入后的长期满意度,使用经过验证的法国版充气阴茎植入物满意度调查(SSIPI),同时评估围手术期结果和长期装置存活率。患者和方法:本回顾性单中心研究纳入了10年内所有连续接受IPP植入的患者。通过电话访谈使用SSIPI问卷评估患者满意度。分析无修订和无切除生存率。根据EAU术中不良事件和Clavien-Dindo分类对并发症进行分类。结果:共纳入201例患者(中位年龄63.3岁)。其中89人(44.3%)完成了SSIPI问卷。SSIPI评分中位数为67分[59-73],88.7%的患者为满意,58.4%的患者为高度满意。没有发现显著的满意度预测因子。总体术后并发症发生率为16.9%,其中3%需要在30天内进行手术翻修。在随访期间,30.3%的患者接受了手术翻修,其中10.9%的患者切除了装置。60个月无修改生存率为61.7%,无移除装置生存率为83.6%。既往PP植入史是进行翻修和切除的唯一重要危险因素。结论:IPP植入术患者满意度高。结果是多因素的,不能仅仅通过手术成功来解释。确定不满意的预测因素对于优化长期患者管理至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书