Hospital efficiency assessment: a systematic review of DEA and hybrid DEA-machine learning approaches.

IF 4.6 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Frontiers in medical technology Pub Date : 2026-06-10 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fmedt.2026.1820803
Nesrin Alkan, Ubeyde Kaan Koluk, Bilal Baris Alkan, Alper Sinan
{"title":"Hospital efficiency assessment: a systematic review of DEA and hybrid DEA-machine learning approaches.","authors":"Nesrin Alkan, Ubeyde Kaan Koluk, Bilal Baris Alkan, Alper Sinan","doi":"10.3389/fmedt.2026.1820803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The increasing complexity of healthcare systems and growing resource constraints have made hospital efficiency assessment central to healthcare management and policy. Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) has been widely used to evaluate hospital efficiency due to its ability to accommodate multiple input and output structures. However, classical DEA applications provide limited support for explaining efficiency scores, generating predictions, and informing managerial decision-making. This study systematically reviews hospital efficiency studies published between 2020 and 2025 to examine the use and limitations of DEA and to identify approaches integrating DEA with machine learning (ML). To more comprehensively demonstrate the methodological diversity of DEA-machine learning integration, studies from non-healthcare fields have also been included in the comparative analysis. Following PRISMA guidelines, standalone DEA and DEA-ML studies were analysed and coded across methodological dimensions. Multiple Correspondence Analysis was applied to identify dominant methodological configurations and emerging patterns in the literature. Findings indicate that CCR and BCC models remain prevalent, with human resources and financial indicators as common inputs and service delivery measures as outputs. DEA-ML research largely relies on two-stage structures focused on classification and prediction. The results highlight methodological gaps and the potential of more explainable and decision-support-oriented DEA-ML approaches to enhance benchmarking and resource allocation in hospital efficiency management.</p>","PeriodicalId":94015,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in medical technology","volume":"8 ","pages":"1820803"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13290754/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in medical technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmedt.2026.1820803","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The increasing complexity of healthcare systems and growing resource constraints have made hospital efficiency assessment central to healthcare management and policy. Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) has been widely used to evaluate hospital efficiency due to its ability to accommodate multiple input and output structures. However, classical DEA applications provide limited support for explaining efficiency scores, generating predictions, and informing managerial decision-making. This study systematically reviews hospital efficiency studies published between 2020 and 2025 to examine the use and limitations of DEA and to identify approaches integrating DEA with machine learning (ML). To more comprehensively demonstrate the methodological diversity of DEA-machine learning integration, studies from non-healthcare fields have also been included in the comparative analysis. Following PRISMA guidelines, standalone DEA and DEA-ML studies were analysed and coded across methodological dimensions. Multiple Correspondence Analysis was applied to identify dominant methodological configurations and emerging patterns in the literature. Findings indicate that CCR and BCC models remain prevalent, with human resources and financial indicators as common inputs and service delivery measures as outputs. DEA-ML research largely relies on two-stage structures focused on classification and prediction. The results highlight methodological gaps and the potential of more explainable and decision-support-oriented DEA-ML approaches to enhance benchmarking and resource allocation in hospital efficiency management.

医院效率评估:对DEA和混合DEA-机器学习方法的系统回顾。
日益复杂的医疗保健系统和日益增长的资源限制使得医院效率评估成为医疗保健管理和政策的中心。数据包络分析(DEA)由于能够适应多种投入和产出结构而被广泛应用于医院效率评估。然而,经典的DEA应用程序在解释效率分数、生成预测和告知管理决策方面提供有限的支持。本研究系统回顾了2020年至2025年间发表的医院效率研究,以检查DEA的使用和局限性,并确定将DEA与机器学习(ML)相结合的方法。为了更全面地展示dea -机器学习集成的方法多样性,来自非医疗保健领域的研究也被纳入比较分析。按照PRISMA的指导方针,对独立的DEA和DEA- ml研究进行了分析,并在方法学维度上进行了编码。多重对应分析用于识别文献中主要的方法配置和新出现的模式。调查结果表明,CCR和BCC模型仍然普遍存在,人力资源和财务指标作为共同投入,服务提供措施作为产出。DEA-ML研究很大程度上依赖于两阶段结构,即分类和预测。结果突出了方法学上的差距,以及更具可解释性和决策支持导向的DEA-ML方法的潜力,以加强医院效率管理中的基准和资源分配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书