[Reshaping surgical strategies for pancreatic cancer in the era of neoadjuvant therapy: challenges and opportunities].

J He, Z Li
{"title":"[Reshaping surgical strategies for pancreatic cancer in the era of neoadjuvant therapy: challenges and opportunities].","authors":"J He, Z Li","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20260311-00097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the widespread adoption of neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer, the traditional surgery-centered treatment paradigm is undergoing a profound shift. Against the background of upfront systemic therapy, surgery no longer naturally occupies the starting point of the treatment sequence; instead, its indications, timing, and expected benefits must be re-evaluated and redefined within the new treatment framework. By improving completion of the entire treatment course, enabling biological selection, and optimizing patient selection for surgical intervention, neoadjuvant therapy has driven a shift in resectability assessment from a purely anatomical judgment toward a comprehensive decision-making model that integrates tumor biology and treatment response. Nevertheless, surgical practice faces multiple challenges, including blurred boundaries of surgical indications, greater complexity in determining the optimal timing of surgery, evolving technical difficulty and perioperative risk, and the limitations of traditional evaluation frameworks. On this basis, the role of surgeons is evolving from executors of surgical techniques to central decision-makers within multidisciplinary teams, accompanied by increasing refinement of surgical strategies and ongoing innovation in surgical techniques and assessment concepts. Overall, the reshaping of surgical strategies for pancreatic cancer in the era of neoadjuvant therapy is not centered on the binary question of whether to operate, but rather on determining for whom, when, and how surgery should be performed, with the ultimate goal of achieving precise surgical decision-making oriented toward long-term survival benefit for patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":60685,"journal":{"name":"中华外科杂志","volume":"64 8","pages":"850-855"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20260311-00097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the widespread adoption of neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer, the traditional surgery-centered treatment paradigm is undergoing a profound shift. Against the background of upfront systemic therapy, surgery no longer naturally occupies the starting point of the treatment sequence; instead, its indications, timing, and expected benefits must be re-evaluated and redefined within the new treatment framework. By improving completion of the entire treatment course, enabling biological selection, and optimizing patient selection for surgical intervention, neoadjuvant therapy has driven a shift in resectability assessment from a purely anatomical judgment toward a comprehensive decision-making model that integrates tumor biology and treatment response. Nevertheless, surgical practice faces multiple challenges, including blurred boundaries of surgical indications, greater complexity in determining the optimal timing of surgery, evolving technical difficulty and perioperative risk, and the limitations of traditional evaluation frameworks. On this basis, the role of surgeons is evolving from executors of surgical techniques to central decision-makers within multidisciplinary teams, accompanied by increasing refinement of surgical strategies and ongoing innovation in surgical techniques and assessment concepts. Overall, the reshaping of surgical strategies for pancreatic cancer in the era of neoadjuvant therapy is not centered on the binary question of whether to operate, but rather on determining for whom, when, and how surgery should be performed, with the ultimate goal of achieving precise surgical decision-making oriented toward long-term survival benefit for patients.

[新辅助治疗时代胰腺癌手术策略的重塑:挑战与机遇]。
随着胰腺癌新辅助治疗的广泛采用,传统的以手术为中心的治疗模式正在发生深刻的转变。在前期全身治疗的背景下,手术不再自然地占据治疗顺序的起点;相反,它的适应症、时间和预期益处必须在新的治疗框架内重新评估和重新定义。新辅助治疗提高了整个治疗过程的完成率,实现了生物选择,优化了手术干预的患者选择,推动了可切除性评估从单纯的解剖学判断向综合肿瘤生物学和治疗反应的综合决策模型的转变。然而,外科实践面临着多重挑战,包括手术适应证界限模糊,确定最佳手术时机更加复杂,技术难度和围手术期风险不断变化,以及传统评估框架的局限性。在此基础上,外科医生的角色正在从手术技术的执行者演变为多学科团队中的核心决策者,伴随着手术策略的不断完善和手术技术和评估概念的不断创新。总的来说,在新辅助治疗时代,胰腺癌手术策略的重塑不是集中在是否手术的二元问题上,而是确定应该为谁,何时以及如何进行手术,最终目标是实现精确的手术决策,以实现患者的长期生存利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20861
期刊介绍: Chinese Journal of Surgery|Chin J Surg (monthly) is a high-level medical science and technology journal approved by the General Administration of Press and Publication of the People's Republic of China, under the supervision of the China Association for Science and Technology, and organised by the Chinese Medical Association for domestic and international public circulation. It was founded in January 1951, and is published on the basis of the Journal of Chinese Surgery. The Journal is aimed at senior and intermediate surgeons and related researchers, mainly reporting the leading scientific research results and clinical experience in the field of surgery, as well as the basic theoretical research that has a guiding effect on the clinical work of surgery. Chinese Journal of Surgery|Chin J Surg is committed to reflecting the major research progress in the field of surgery in China and promoting academic exchanges at home and abroad. The main columns include thesis, meta-analysis, review, expert forum, synthesis, case report, diagnosis and treatment experience, technical exchange, clinical case discussion, academic controversy, and special lectures, etc. The journal has been accepted by the National Academy of Medicine of the United States. The journal has been included in many famous databases at home and abroad, such as the Biomedical Analysis and Online Retrieval System (MEDLINE) of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书