Exploring gender differences in Physiotherapy research in Italy: a cross-sectional analysis.

IF 3.1 Q1 REHABILITATION
Archives of physiotherapy Pub Date : 2026-06-10 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.33393/aop.2026.3467
Martina Putzolu, Simone Gambazza, Greta Castellini, Andrea Turolla, Silvia Gianola
{"title":"Exploring gender differences in Physiotherapy research in Italy: a cross-sectional analysis.","authors":"Martina Putzolu, Simone Gambazza, Greta Castellini, Andrea Turolla, Silvia Gianola","doi":"10.33393/aop.2026.3467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Gender equity in scientific research, especially in Physiotherapy, reveals significant underrepresentation of women, affecting career advancement, salary, and research recognition. This study aims to examine the characteristics, knowledge, attitudes, and productivity of Physiotherapy researchers in Italy, focusing on gender distribution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study was conducted on Italian Physiotherapists who either have a PhD or are currently enrolled in PhD programs.We used a survey consisting of 62 items that explored demographic and educational characteristics, research experience, work-life balance, attitude and social norms, and career-related factors. Performance metrics included H-index, number of publications (during PhD and in the whole career), and awards.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 167 Physiotherapists surveyed, 102 participated. Female participants reported worse attitudes and social norms perception, and during their PhD, were less satisfied with work conditions compared to males. Females reported a median of 3 publications during their PhD, and males 5. However, after adjusting for age, time invested in research, and whether the interviewee lives with a partner, age remains the only associated factor. There is no evidence of an association between gender and H-index or awards.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Gender-based disparities in research attitudes exist in Physiotherapy, particularly during the PhD phase, favoring males. Further research is needed to promote gender equity.</p>","PeriodicalId":72290,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physiotherapy","volume":"16 ","pages":"84-92"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13291837/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33393/aop.2026.3467","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Gender equity in scientific research, especially in Physiotherapy, reveals significant underrepresentation of women, affecting career advancement, salary, and research recognition. This study aims to examine the characteristics, knowledge, attitudes, and productivity of Physiotherapy researchers in Italy, focusing on gender distribution.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on Italian Physiotherapists who either have a PhD or are currently enrolled in PhD programs.We used a survey consisting of 62 items that explored demographic and educational characteristics, research experience, work-life balance, attitude and social norms, and career-related factors. Performance metrics included H-index, number of publications (during PhD and in the whole career), and awards.

Results: Of the 167 Physiotherapists surveyed, 102 participated. Female participants reported worse attitudes and social norms perception, and during their PhD, were less satisfied with work conditions compared to males. Females reported a median of 3 publications during their PhD, and males 5. However, after adjusting for age, time invested in research, and whether the interviewee lives with a partner, age remains the only associated factor. There is no evidence of an association between gender and H-index or awards.

Conclusion: Gender-based disparities in research attitudes exist in Physiotherapy, particularly during the PhD phase, favoring males. Further research is needed to promote gender equity.

探索意大利物理治疗研究中的性别差异:横断面分析。
引言:科学研究中的性别平等,特别是在物理治疗领域,表明女性的代表性明显不足,影响了职业发展、工资和研究认可。本研究旨在考察意大利物理治疗研究人员的特征、知识、态度和生产力,重点关注性别分布。方法:这项横断面研究是对意大利物理治疗师进行的,他们要么拥有博士学位,要么目前正在攻读博士学位。我们使用了一项包含62个项目的调查,探讨了人口统计和教育特征、研究经验、工作与生活平衡、态度和社会规范以及职业相关因素。绩效指标包括h指数、发表论文数量(博士期间和整个职业生涯)和奖项。结果:167名接受调查的物理治疗师中,102名参与了调查。与男性相比,女性参与者的态度和对社会规范的感知更差,在攻读博士学位期间,她们对工作条件的满意度也更低。在攻读博士期间,女性平均发表3篇论文,男性平均发表5篇。然而,在调整了年龄、投入研究的时间以及受访者是否与伴侣生活后,年龄仍然是唯一的相关因素。没有证据表明性别与h指数或奖励之间存在关联。结论:物理治疗研究态度存在性别差异,尤其是在博士阶段,倾向于男性。需要进一步研究以促进性别平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书