Upper Extremity Lymphedema​​​: Performance of a Risk Prediction Model in Women Undergoing Surgery for Breast Cancer.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Alessandra Mendes Silva, Samantha K Lopes de Almeida Rizzi, Fernanda Baptista Rodrigues, Amanda Estevão, Simone Elias
{"title":"Upper Extremity Lymphedema​​​: Performance of a Risk Prediction Model in Women Undergoing Surgery for Breast Cancer.","authors":"Alessandra Mendes Silva, Samantha K Lopes de Almeida Rizzi, Fernanda Baptista Rodrigues, Amanda Estevão, Simone Elias","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Upper extremity lymphedema is a common complication following breast cancer treatment, and supportive tools are valuable for screening, preventive strategies, and early therapeutic intervention. In 2020, Kwan and colleagues proposed a formula to predict the risk of lymphedema.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the performance of a predictive model for lymphedema development (classified as low, moderate, or high risk) in a population of Brazilian women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 190 women who underwent surgery for breast cancer, with at least 6 months of postoperative follow-up. Clinical data were collected, and arm volumetry was performed. The Kwan model was applied using the following variables: age, body mass index (BMI), mammographic density, number of positive lymph nodes, and type of axillary surgery (sentinel lymph node biopsy or axillary lymph node dissection). Predicted values were compared with observed outcomes and categorized into low, moderate, or high risk.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The model demonstrated low predictive accuracy (RMSE=223.54; R2=-0.18). The overall accuracy rate was 76%, but sensitivity was low (48%), with a positive predictive value of 22%. Specificity was acceptable (79%), and the negative predictive value was high (92%). However, the low incidence of lymphedema in the study population should be considered.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The model showed limited performance in predicting positive cases of lymphedema, but may have utility as a rule-out (screening) tool. New models incorporating broader clinical variables and technologies, such as machine learning, may provide improved positive predictive accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0000000000001339","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Upper extremity lymphedema is a common complication following breast cancer treatment, and supportive tools are valuable for screening, preventive strategies, and early therapeutic intervention. In 2020, Kwan and colleagues proposed a formula to predict the risk of lymphedema.

Objective: To evaluate the performance of a predictive model for lymphedema development (classified as low, moderate, or high risk) in a population of Brazilian women.

Methods: This retrospective study included 190 women who underwent surgery for breast cancer, with at least 6 months of postoperative follow-up. Clinical data were collected, and arm volumetry was performed. The Kwan model was applied using the following variables: age, body mass index (BMI), mammographic density, number of positive lymph nodes, and type of axillary surgery (sentinel lymph node biopsy or axillary lymph node dissection). Predicted values were compared with observed outcomes and categorized into low, moderate, or high risk.

Results: The model demonstrated low predictive accuracy (RMSE=223.54; R2=-0.18). The overall accuracy rate was 76%, but sensitivity was low (48%), with a positive predictive value of 22%. Specificity was acceptable (79%), and the negative predictive value was high (92%). However, the low incidence of lymphedema in the study population should be considered.

Conclusion: The model showed limited performance in predicting positive cases of lymphedema, but may have utility as a rule-out (screening) tool. New models incorporating broader clinical variables and technologies, such as machine learning, may provide improved positive predictive accuracy.

上肢淋巴水肿:乳腺癌手术妇女的风险预测模型的性能。
导读:上肢淋巴水肿是乳腺癌治疗后常见的并发症,支持工具对于筛查、预防策略和早期治疗干预是有价值的。在2020年,Kwan和他的同事提出了一个预测淋巴水肿风险的公式。目的:评估巴西女性人群中淋巴水肿发展(低、中、高风险)预测模型的性能。方法:这项回顾性研究包括190名接受乳腺癌手术的妇女,术后随访至少6个月。收集临床资料,进行上肢体积测量。使用以下变量应用Kwan模型:年龄、体重指数(BMI)、乳房x线摄影密度、阳性淋巴结数量和腋窝手术类型(前哨淋巴结活检或腋窝淋巴结清扫)。将预测值与观察结果进行比较,并将其分为低、中、高风险。结果:该模型预测准确率较低(RMSE=223.54; R2=-0.18)。总体准确率为76%,但敏感性较低(48%),阳性预测值为22%。特异性可接受(79%),阴性预测值较高(92%)。然而,应该考虑到研究人群中淋巴水肿的低发病率。结论:该模型在预测淋巴水肿阳性病例方面表现有限,但可能作为一种排除(筛选)工具。结合更广泛的临床变量和技术(如机器学习)的新模型可能会提高预测的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
130
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​American Journal of Clinical Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal for cancer surgeons, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, GYN oncologists, and pediatric oncologists. The emphasis of AJCO is on combined modality multidisciplinary loco-regional management of cancer. The journal also gives emphasis to translational research, outcome studies, and cost utility analyses, and includes opinion pieces and review articles. The editorial board includes a large number of distinguished surgeons, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, GYN oncologists, pediatric oncologists, and others who are internationally recognized for expertise in their fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书