Disentangling host identity and storage time effects on gut microbiota composition in captive migratory birds using absolute and relative quantification.

IF 2.1 2区 生物学 Q2 ZOOLOGY
Current Zoology Pub Date : 2025-10-03 eCollection Date: 2026-06-01 DOI:10.1093/cz/zoaf066
Cuiping Liu, Zhiyong Wu, Dongtao Li, Jiaxiao He, Guoliang Li, Fuwen Wei
{"title":"Disentangling host identity and storage time effects on gut microbiota composition in captive migratory birds using absolute and relative quantification.","authors":"Cuiping Liu, Zhiyong Wu, Dongtao Li, Jiaxiao He, Guoliang Li, Fuwen Wei","doi":"10.1093/cz/zoaf066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Understanding how gut microbiota support migratory birds is essential; yet, fecal sample freshness is often a challenge, particularly for rare species that cannot be captured directly. Here, we collected fecal samples from multiple captive migratory bird species at Nanchang Zoo and grouped them by post-defecation time (0, 1, 2, and 4 h). Using both relative and absolute quantification, we assessed the effects of host identity, short-term storage, and their interaction on gut microbiota composition. Species identity and quantification method significantly shaped microbiota profiles. Absolute quantification revealed Firmicutes (763,405.73 copies/μL) and Proteobacteria (340,231.03 copies/μL) as dominant in Grey-crowned Cranes, whereas relative quantification indicated Firmicutes (96.74%) predominated in Swan Geese and Proteobacteria (30.30%) in Black-necked Cranes. Red-crowned Cranes showed higher species richness than Black Swans and Swan Geese, with a significantly greater Shannon index than the latter. PCoA demonstrated clear interspecific differences, especially between crane and waterfowl lineages. Storage time had no significant effects on alpha and beta diversity across 6 species, except for reduced richness in Swan Geese at 2 and 4 h. While overall community structure was stable, a few conditionally rare taxa displayed time-sensitive shifts shortly after defecation. Our findings highlight that both host identity and quantification approach are critical determinants of avian gut microbiota profiles and emphasize that fecal sample freshness mainly affects rare taxa. This study provides methodological insights for optimizing fecal sampling protocols in field-based microbiome research on migratory birds.</p>","PeriodicalId":50599,"journal":{"name":"Current Zoology","volume":"72 3","pages":"441-450"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13290400/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Zoology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cz/zoaf066","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding how gut microbiota support migratory birds is essential; yet, fecal sample freshness is often a challenge, particularly for rare species that cannot be captured directly. Here, we collected fecal samples from multiple captive migratory bird species at Nanchang Zoo and grouped them by post-defecation time (0, 1, 2, and 4 h). Using both relative and absolute quantification, we assessed the effects of host identity, short-term storage, and their interaction on gut microbiota composition. Species identity and quantification method significantly shaped microbiota profiles. Absolute quantification revealed Firmicutes (763,405.73 copies/μL) and Proteobacteria (340,231.03 copies/μL) as dominant in Grey-crowned Cranes, whereas relative quantification indicated Firmicutes (96.74%) predominated in Swan Geese and Proteobacteria (30.30%) in Black-necked Cranes. Red-crowned Cranes showed higher species richness than Black Swans and Swan Geese, with a significantly greater Shannon index than the latter. PCoA demonstrated clear interspecific differences, especially between crane and waterfowl lineages. Storage time had no significant effects on alpha and beta diversity across 6 species, except for reduced richness in Swan Geese at 2 and 4 h. While overall community structure was stable, a few conditionally rare taxa displayed time-sensitive shifts shortly after defecation. Our findings highlight that both host identity and quantification approach are critical determinants of avian gut microbiota profiles and emphasize that fecal sample freshness mainly affects rare taxa. This study provides methodological insights for optimizing fecal sampling protocols in field-based microbiome research on migratory birds.

利用绝对定量和相对定量分析宿主身份和储存时间对圈养候鸟肠道微生物群组成的影响。
了解肠道微生物群如何支持候鸟是至关重要的;然而,粪便样本的新鲜度往往是一个挑战,特别是对于无法直接捕获的稀有物种。本文收集了南昌动物园圈养候鸟的粪便样本,并按排便后时间(0、1、2和4 h)对其进行了分类。利用相对定量和绝对定量,我们评估了宿主身份、短期储存及其相互作用对肠道微生物群组成的影响。物种鉴定和定量方法显著地塑造了微生物群剖面。绝对定量结果显示,灰顶鹤以厚壁菌门(763,405.73拷贝/μL)和变形菌门(340,231.03拷贝/μL)为主,天鹅以厚壁菌门(96.74%)为主,黑颈鹤以变形菌门(30.30%)为主。丹顶鹤的物种丰富度高于黑天鹅和大雁,Shannon指数显著高于后者。PCoA表现出明显的种间差异,特别是在鹤和水禽谱系之间。贮藏时间对6个物种的α和β多样性均无显著影响,但在贮藏2和4 h时,大雁的α和β多样性有所降低。虽然群落结构总体稳定,但少数有条件罕见的类群在排便后不久就出现了时间敏感的变化。我们的研究结果强调了宿主身份和定量方法是禽肠道微生物群概况的关键决定因素,并强调了粪便样本新鲜度主要影响稀有分类群。本研究为候鸟野外微生物组研究中粪便采样方案的优化提供了方法学上的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Zoology
Current Zoology Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
111
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: About the Journal Current Zoology (formerly Acta Zoologica Sinica, founded in 1935) is an open access, bimonthly, peer-reviewed international journal of zoology. It publishes review articles and research papers in the fields of ecology, evolution and behaviour. Current Zoology is sponsored by Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, along with the China Zoological Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书