{"title":"Seasonal Differences in Community-level Mobbing Responses of Passerines Toward a Diurnal Owl in Taiwan.","authors":"Ta-Chih Chen, Jo-Szu Tsai","doi":"10.6620/ZS.2026.65-18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prey use a variety of anti-predator behavior, including alarm calling and approaching predators, and may adjust these behaviors by evaluating their benefits and costs. However, it remains unclear how prey expresses anti-predator behavior across seasons, when both breeding status or predator diet may influence perceived risk. We conducted nine-minute playback surveys (six-minute quiet period and subsequent three-minute playback) using calls of Collared Owlet (<i>Glaucidium brodiei</i>), a diurnal owl that preys on passerines, at 93 sites during breeding season and non-breeding season in Taiwan. We quantified whether the small passerine birds approach and make alarm call or not to quantify mobbing response. We found that probability of making alarm calls did not differ between seasons (30.88% and 29.15% in breeding and non-breeding season, respectively), whereas probability of approaching was higher in breeding (25.63%) than in non-breeding season (13.28%). To verify that responses were specific to predator cues rather than to loud vocalizations in general, we conducted supplementary playbacks using calls of a non-predatory species, Taiwan Barbet (<i>Psilopogon nuchalis</i>), which elicited markedly lower mobbing responses. Together, these results indicate that small passerine birds mob in both seasons but reduce the use of higher-risk behaviors against predators during the non-breeding season, consistent with seasonal variation in predation risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":49331,"journal":{"name":"Zoological Studies","volume":"65 ","pages":"e18"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13291897/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zoological Studies","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6620/ZS.2026.65-18","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Prey use a variety of anti-predator behavior, including alarm calling and approaching predators, and may adjust these behaviors by evaluating their benefits and costs. However, it remains unclear how prey expresses anti-predator behavior across seasons, when both breeding status or predator diet may influence perceived risk. We conducted nine-minute playback surveys (six-minute quiet period and subsequent three-minute playback) using calls of Collared Owlet (Glaucidium brodiei), a diurnal owl that preys on passerines, at 93 sites during breeding season and non-breeding season in Taiwan. We quantified whether the small passerine birds approach and make alarm call or not to quantify mobbing response. We found that probability of making alarm calls did not differ between seasons (30.88% and 29.15% in breeding and non-breeding season, respectively), whereas probability of approaching was higher in breeding (25.63%) than in non-breeding season (13.28%). To verify that responses were specific to predator cues rather than to loud vocalizations in general, we conducted supplementary playbacks using calls of a non-predatory species, Taiwan Barbet (Psilopogon nuchalis), which elicited markedly lower mobbing responses. Together, these results indicate that small passerine birds mob in both seasons but reduce the use of higher-risk behaviors against predators during the non-breeding season, consistent with seasonal variation in predation risk.
期刊介绍:
Zoological Studies publishes original research papers in five major fields: Animal Behavior, Comparative Physiology, Evolution, Ecology, and Systematics and Biogeography. Manuscripts are welcome from around the world and must be written in English. When the manuscript concerns the use of animals or specimens in research, a statement must be included to the effect that the author(s) has adhered to the legal requirements of the country in which the work was carried out or to any institutional guidelines.