CUI-Curate: a GraphRAG-based framework for automated clinical concept curation for NLP applications.

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Victoria Blake, Jamie Novak, Mathew Miller, Sze-Yuan Ooi, Blanca Gallego
{"title":"CUI-Curate: a GraphRAG-based framework for automated clinical concept curation for NLP applications.","authors":"Victoria Blake, Jamie Novak, Mathew Miller, Sze-Yuan Ooi, Blanca Gallego","doi":"10.1093/jamia/ocag110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical named entity recognition tools commonly map free text to Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) Concept Unique Identifiers (CUIs). For many downstream tasks, however, the clinically meaningful unit is not a single CUI but a concept set comprising related synonyms, subtypes, and associated concepts. Constructing these sets is labour-intensive, inconsistently performed, and poorly supported by existing tools.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We present CUI-Curate, a graph-based retrieval-augmented-generation (GraphRAG) framework for automated UMLS concept set curation. A UMLS knowledge graph was constructed and embedded for semantic retrieval. Candidate CUIs were retrieved using graph-based expansion and then filtered and classified using large language models (GPT-5 and Qwen3-32B). The framework was evaluated on five lexically heterogeneous clinical concepts against manually curated concept sets and gold-standard concept sets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CUI-Curate produced substantially larger and more complete concept sets than the manual benchmarks. A single retrieval configuration across concepts achieved high recall of definitive concepts with manageable candidate sets. GPT-5 outperformed manual curation for all concepts and retained at least 95% of definitive gold-standard CUIs, while Qwen3-32B achieved comparable but slightly lower performance. Many missed concepts were not observed in 10,000 MIMIC-III notes. CUI-Curate infrastructure and end-to-end processing were inexpensive and stable across runs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CUI-Curate offers a scalable, reproducible, and cost-efficient approach for generating clinician-reviewable UMLS concept sets tailored to clinical natural language processing and phenotyping applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":50016,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association","volume":" ","pages":"1898-1909"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13630293/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocag110","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clinical named entity recognition tools commonly map free text to Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) Concept Unique Identifiers (CUIs). For many downstream tasks, however, the clinically meaningful unit is not a single CUI but a concept set comprising related synonyms, subtypes, and associated concepts. Constructing these sets is labour-intensive, inconsistently performed, and poorly supported by existing tools.

Methods: We present CUI-Curate, a graph-based retrieval-augmented-generation (GraphRAG) framework for automated UMLS concept set curation. A UMLS knowledge graph was constructed and embedded for semantic retrieval. Candidate CUIs were retrieved using graph-based expansion and then filtered and classified using large language models (GPT-5 and Qwen3-32B). The framework was evaluated on five lexically heterogeneous clinical concepts against manually curated concept sets and gold-standard concept sets.

Results: CUI-Curate produced substantially larger and more complete concept sets than the manual benchmarks. A single retrieval configuration across concepts achieved high recall of definitive concepts with manageable candidate sets. GPT-5 outperformed manual curation for all concepts and retained at least 95% of definitive gold-standard CUIs, while Qwen3-32B achieved comparable but slightly lower performance. Many missed concepts were not observed in 10,000 MIMIC-III notes. CUI-Curate infrastructure and end-to-end processing were inexpensive and stable across runs.

Conclusions: CUI-Curate offers a scalable, reproducible, and cost-efficient approach for generating clinician-reviewable UMLS concept sets tailored to clinical natural language processing and phenotyping applications.

gui - curate:一个基于graphrag的框架,用于NLP应用程序的自动临床概念管理。
背景:临床命名实体识别工具通常将自由文本映射到统一医学语言系统(UMLS)概念唯一标识符(gui)。然而,对于许多下游任务,临床意义单元不是单个CUI,而是包含相关同义词、亚型和相关概念的概念集。构建这些集合是劳动密集型的,执行起来不一致,而且现有工具的支持很差。方法:我们提出了gui - curate,一个基于图的检索增强生成(GraphRAG)框架,用于自动UMLS概念集管理。构造并嵌入了UMLS知识图谱,用于语义检索。使用基于图的扩展检索候选gui,然后使用大型语言模型(GPT-5和Qwen3-32B)进行过滤和分类。该框架在五个词法上异质的临床概念上进行评估,对照人工策划的概念集和金标准概念集。结果:与手动基准测试相比,gui - curate产生了更大、更完整的概念集。跨概念的单一检索配置通过可管理的候选集实现了确定概念的高召回。GPT-5在所有概念上的表现都优于手动管理,并保留了至少95%的最终黄金标准gui,而Qwen3-32B达到了类似的性能,但性能略低。在1万个MIMIC-III笔记中没有观察到许多遗漏的概念。gui - curate基础设施和端到端处理在运行期间价格低廉且稳定。结论:CUI-Curate提供了一种可扩展、可重复且经济高效的方法,用于生成临床可审查的UMLS概念集,该概念集适合临床自然语言处理和表型应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 医学-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
7.80%
发文量
230
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMIA is AMIA''s premier peer-reviewed journal for biomedical and health informatics. Covering the full spectrum of activities in the field, JAMIA includes informatics articles in the areas of clinical care, clinical research, translational science, implementation science, imaging, education, consumer health, public health, and policy. JAMIA''s articles describe innovative informatics research and systems that help to advance biomedical science and to promote health. Case reports, perspectives and reviews also help readers stay connected with the most important informatics developments in implementation, policy and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书