Executive Summary of the American Radium Society (ARS) Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) for the Use of Radiation in the Prevention and Treatment of Heterotopic Ossification (HO).

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Austin Dove, Phillip Bennion, Sam Jean-Baptiste, Austin N Kirschner, Bobby Koneru, Christien Kluwe, Neil Newman, Tracy M Paul, Kevin Pearlstein, Yasamin H Sharifzade-Moghaddam, Nick Scarcella, Stephen M Schaaf, Rahul Tendulkar, Suzanne Russo
{"title":"Executive Summary of the American Radium Society (ARS) Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) for the Use of Radiation in the Prevention and Treatment of Heterotopic Ossification (HO).","authors":"Austin Dove, Phillip Bennion, Sam Jean-Baptiste, Austin N Kirschner, Bobby Koneru, Christien Kluwe, Neil Newman, Tracy M Paul, Kevin Pearlstein, Yasamin H Sharifzade-Moghaddam, Nick Scarcella, Stephen M Schaaf, Rahul Tendulkar, Suzanne Russo","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To summarize the current evidence for radiation therapy (RT) in the prevention and treatment of heterotopic ossification (HO), including patient selection, optimal RT technique, and associated risks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multispecialty-led committee includes radiation oncologists, rheumatologists, orthopedic surgeons, and physical medicine/rehabilitation physicians. Using the population, intervention, comparator, outcome, timing and study design (PICOTS) framework, evidence regarding treatment outcomes was assessed using Cochrane and PRISMA methodology. Eligible studies included prospective and retrospective studies published between January 1, 1980, and November 1, 2025, from Embase, Medline, and PubMed databases. Of the 197 articles identified using the search strategy, 83 were selected for inclusion as evidence, including 27 well-designed studies (phase II randomized and phase III), 16 moderately well-designed studies that account for most common biases (matched cohort and phase II studies), 31 studies with design limitations (retrospective reviews), 2 supplemental studies (not useful as primary evidence), and 7 meta-analyses. Additional studies were included to provide context and were not used to guide recommendations. Well-established RAND-UCLA consensus methodology (modified Delphi) was used to rate the appropriateness of the treatment options.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results of this analysis demonstrate that in appropriately selected patients, RT is an effective and safe therapy for prophylaxis of HO formation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This systematic review provides consensus guidelines for the use of RT as prophylaxis of HO based on current peer-reviewed evidence in the literature.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0000000000001345","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To summarize the current evidence for radiation therapy (RT) in the prevention and treatment of heterotopic ossification (HO), including patient selection, optimal RT technique, and associated risks.

Methods: This multispecialty-led committee includes radiation oncologists, rheumatologists, orthopedic surgeons, and physical medicine/rehabilitation physicians. Using the population, intervention, comparator, outcome, timing and study design (PICOTS) framework, evidence regarding treatment outcomes was assessed using Cochrane and PRISMA methodology. Eligible studies included prospective and retrospective studies published between January 1, 1980, and November 1, 2025, from Embase, Medline, and PubMed databases. Of the 197 articles identified using the search strategy, 83 were selected for inclusion as evidence, including 27 well-designed studies (phase II randomized and phase III), 16 moderately well-designed studies that account for most common biases (matched cohort and phase II studies), 31 studies with design limitations (retrospective reviews), 2 supplemental studies (not useful as primary evidence), and 7 meta-analyses. Additional studies were included to provide context and were not used to guide recommendations. Well-established RAND-UCLA consensus methodology (modified Delphi) was used to rate the appropriateness of the treatment options.

Results: The results of this analysis demonstrate that in appropriately selected patients, RT is an effective and safe therapy for prophylaxis of HO formation.

Conclusions: This systematic review provides consensus guidelines for the use of RT as prophylaxis of HO based on current peer-reviewed evidence in the literature.

美国镭学会(ARS)放射预防和治疗异位骨化(HO)的适当使用标准(AUC)执行摘要
目的:总结放射治疗(RT)预防和治疗异位骨化(HO)的现有证据,包括患者选择、最佳放疗技术和相关风险。方法:这个多专业领导的委员会包括放射肿瘤学家、风湿病学家、骨科医生和物理医学/康复医生。采用人群、干预、比较物、结果、时间和研究设计(PICOTS)框架,使用Cochrane和PRISMA方法评估有关治疗结果的证据。符合条件的研究包括发表于1980年1月1日至2025年11月1日之间的前瞻性和回顾性研究,这些研究来自Embase、Medline和PubMed数据库。在使用检索策略确定的197篇文章中,83篇被选为纳入证据,包括27项设计良好的研究(II期随机和III期),16项设计一般良好的研究(匹配队列和II期研究),31项设计局限性研究(回顾性评价),2项补充研究(不能作为主要证据)和7项荟萃分析。额外的研究被纳入以提供背景,但不用于指导建议。采用完善的RAND-UCLA共识方法(改进的德尔菲法)来评价治疗方案的适宜性。结果:本分析结果表明,在适当选择的患者中,RT是一种有效且安全的预防HO形成的治疗方法。结论:本系统综述基于当前文献中同行评审的证据,为使用RT作为HO的预防提供了共识指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
130
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​American Journal of Clinical Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal for cancer surgeons, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, GYN oncologists, and pediatric oncologists. The emphasis of AJCO is on combined modality multidisciplinary loco-regional management of cancer. The journal also gives emphasis to translational research, outcome studies, and cost utility analyses, and includes opinion pieces and review articles. The editorial board includes a large number of distinguished surgeons, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, GYN oncologists, pediatric oncologists, and others who are internationally recognized for expertise in their fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书