Auricular Acupressure for Preventing Postoperative Catheter-Related Bladder Discomfort in Male Patients Undergoing Spinal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 2.5 Q1 NURSING
Nursing Research and Practice Pub Date : 2026-06-24 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1155/nrp/3182987
Yang Dong, Dingde Long, Bei Fang, Shui-Gen Song, Peng Liao, Tian-Yuan Li, Lei Li
{"title":"Auricular Acupressure for Preventing Postoperative Catheter-Related Bladder Discomfort in Male Patients Undergoing Spinal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Yang Dong, Dingde Long, Bei Fang, Shui-Gen Song, Peng Liao, Tian-Yuan Li, Lei Li","doi":"10.1155/nrp/3182987","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims and objectives: </strong>This present study evaluated the utility of auricular acupressure (AA) in alleviating catheter-related bladder discomfort (CRBD).</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>The efficacy and safety of current treatments for postoperative CRBD in male patients remain suboptimal.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A randomized, placebo-controlled trial was conducted.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This trial enrolled male patients postlumbar surgery from 1 July 2024 to 31 August 2024. Participants were allocated to an AA group (Group AA, <i>n</i> = 40) or a placebo control group (Group C, <i>n</i> = 40). Both groups received 3 days of intervention prior to surgery. Outcomes included the following: Moderate-to-severe CRBD at extubation; 24-h postoperative opioid requirement; CRBD severity (none/mild/moderate-to-severe) at 1, 6, and 24 h postextubation; postoperative pain; and patient satisfaction. Data were analyzed via SPSS 23 using <i>t</i>-tests, chi-square tests, and repeated-measures ANOVA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this randomized trial of 80 male spinal surgery patients, AA significantly reduced moderate-to-severe CRBD incidence at extubation (T1): 22.5% (9/40) in Group AA vs. 52.5% (21/40) in Group C (RR: 0.263; 95% CI: 0.100-0.691; <i>p</i> = 0.006). AA decreased the subjects of 24-h supplemental opioid requirements (17.5% vs. 37.5%; RR: 2.829; 95% CI: 1.003-7.977; <i>p</i> = 0.045) and elevated patient satisfaction (median 5.0 vs. 4.0; <i>p</i> = 0.034). No between-group differences existed in morphine-equivalent consumption or CRBD severity beyond T1 (<i>p</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AA is an effective, nonpharmacological intervention that reduces early postoperative CRBD severity and opioid demand while enhancing recovery satisfaction in catheterized males. As a noninvasive, side-effect-free intervention, AA warrants integration into enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols for catheterized patients. <b>Trial Registration:</b> Chinese Registry of Clinical Trials: ChiCTR2400086089.</p>","PeriodicalId":46917,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Research and Practice","volume":"2026 ","pages":"3182987"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13291715/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/nrp/3182987","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims and objectives: This present study evaluated the utility of auricular acupressure (AA) in alleviating catheter-related bladder discomfort (CRBD).

Background: The efficacy and safety of current treatments for postoperative CRBD in male patients remain suboptimal.

Design: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial was conducted.

Methods: This trial enrolled male patients postlumbar surgery from 1 July 2024 to 31 August 2024. Participants were allocated to an AA group (Group AA, n = 40) or a placebo control group (Group C, n = 40). Both groups received 3 days of intervention prior to surgery. Outcomes included the following: Moderate-to-severe CRBD at extubation; 24-h postoperative opioid requirement; CRBD severity (none/mild/moderate-to-severe) at 1, 6, and 24 h postextubation; postoperative pain; and patient satisfaction. Data were analyzed via SPSS 23 using t-tests, chi-square tests, and repeated-measures ANOVA.

Results: In this randomized trial of 80 male spinal surgery patients, AA significantly reduced moderate-to-severe CRBD incidence at extubation (T1): 22.5% (9/40) in Group AA vs. 52.5% (21/40) in Group C (RR: 0.263; 95% CI: 0.100-0.691; p = 0.006). AA decreased the subjects of 24-h supplemental opioid requirements (17.5% vs. 37.5%; RR: 2.829; 95% CI: 1.003-7.977; p = 0.045) and elevated patient satisfaction (median 5.0 vs. 4.0; p = 0.034). No between-group differences existed in morphine-equivalent consumption or CRBD severity beyond T1 (p > 0.05).

Conclusions: AA is an effective, nonpharmacological intervention that reduces early postoperative CRBD severity and opioid demand while enhancing recovery satisfaction in catheterized males. As a noninvasive, side-effect-free intervention, AA warrants integration into enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols for catheterized patients. Trial Registration: Chinese Registry of Clinical Trials: ChiCTR2400086089.

耳指压预防男性脊柱手术患者术后导尿管相关性膀胱不适:一项随机对照试验。
目的和目的:本研究评估了耳穴按压(AA)在缓解导管相关性膀胱不适(CRBD)中的作用。背景:目前治疗男性患者术后CRBD的疗效和安全性仍不理想。设计:进行随机、安慰剂对照试验。方法:该试验招募了2024年7月1日至2024年8月31日腰椎手术后的男性患者。参与者被分配到AA组(AA组,n = 40)或安慰剂对照组(C组,n = 40)。两组均在手术前3天进行干预。结果包括:拔管时中度至重度CRBD;术后24小时阿片类药物需求;拔管后1、6和24小时CRBD严重程度(无/轻度/中度至重度);术后疼痛;以及病人的满意度。数据通过SPSS 23进行分析,采用t检验、卡方检验和重复测量方差分析。结果:在80例男性脊柱手术患者的随机试验中,AA显著降低拔管(T1)时中重度CRBD的发生率:AA组为22.5% (9/40),C组为52.5% (21/40)(RR: 0.263; 95% CI: 0.100-0.691; p = 0.006)。AA降低了受试者24小时阿片类药物补充需求(17.5% vs. 37.5%; RR: 2.829; 95% CI: 1.003-7.977; p = 0.045),提高了患者满意度(中位数5.0 vs. 4.0; p = 0.034)。吗啡当量消耗量和超过T1的CRBD严重程度组间无差异(p < 0.05)。结论:AA是一种有效的非药物干预,可降低术后早期CRBD严重程度和阿片类药物需求,同时提高男性导管术后恢复满意度。作为一种无创、无副作用的干预措施,AA值得整合到导管患者术后增强恢复(ERAS)方案中。试验注册:中国临床试验注册中心:ChiCTR2400086089。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书