ESG Variations Across Banking Loan Types: Evidence From European Listed Banks

IF 1 Q3 ECONOMICS
Economic Notes Pub Date : 2026-06-22 DOI:10.1111/ecno.70024
Paulo Morais Francisco, Eduardo Couto
{"title":"ESG Variations Across Banking Loan Types: Evidence From European Listed Banks","authors":"Paulo Morais Francisco,&nbsp;Eduardo Couto","doi":"10.1111/ecno.70024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Building on social-capital theory and transaction-cost theory, we examine whether European banks' rated ESG performance varies systematically with the composition of their loan portfolios. Merging Refinitiv ESG scores with Orbis Bank Focus loan-book data for 51 EU-listed banks over 2005–2022, we estimate pooled OLS, random-effects, fixed-effects, lagged-variable, and dynamic System-GMM specifications. The evidence points to one robust regularity and two more qualified patterns. First, banks with higher mortgage-loan shares tend to have lower ESG ratings: a one-standard-deviation increase in mortgage intensity is associated with an approximately three-point lower composite ESG score and up to five points lower environmental pillar score, and the negative mortgage association remains visible in the dynamic System-GMM models. Second, consumer-loan intensity is positively associated with ESG ratings in random-effects, fixed-effects, and lagged fixed-effects specifications, particularly for the environmental and social pillars, but this association is not statistically significant in the dynamic System-GMM models. Third, corporate-loan exposure shows no stable relationship with overall ESG ratings. We interpret these patterns as consistent with a trust-intensity mechanism: ESG commitments and lending technologies appear to align differently across collateral-rich, standardised lending and softer-information retail activities.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":44298,"journal":{"name":"Economic Notes","volume":"55 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Notes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecno.70024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Building on social-capital theory and transaction-cost theory, we examine whether European banks' rated ESG performance varies systematically with the composition of their loan portfolios. Merging Refinitiv ESG scores with Orbis Bank Focus loan-book data for 51 EU-listed banks over 2005–2022, we estimate pooled OLS, random-effects, fixed-effects, lagged-variable, and dynamic System-GMM specifications. The evidence points to one robust regularity and two more qualified patterns. First, banks with higher mortgage-loan shares tend to have lower ESG ratings: a one-standard-deviation increase in mortgage intensity is associated with an approximately three-point lower composite ESG score and up to five points lower environmental pillar score, and the negative mortgage association remains visible in the dynamic System-GMM models. Second, consumer-loan intensity is positively associated with ESG ratings in random-effects, fixed-effects, and lagged fixed-effects specifications, particularly for the environmental and social pillars, but this association is not statistically significant in the dynamic System-GMM models. Third, corporate-loan exposure shows no stable relationship with overall ESG ratings. We interpret these patterns as consistent with a trust-intensity mechanism: ESG commitments and lending technologies appear to align differently across collateral-rich, standardised lending and softer-information retail activities.

不同银行贷款类型的ESG差异:来自欧洲上市银行的证据
在社会资本理论和交易成本理论的基础上,我们考察了欧洲银行的ESG绩效评级是否随其贷款组合的构成而系统性地变化。将Refinitiv ESG评分与Orbis Bank Focus 2005-2022年间51家欧盟上市银行的贷款账本数据合并,我们估计了汇总OLS、随机效应、固定效应、滞后变量和动态System-GMM规格。证据指向一个强大的规律和两个更合格的模式。首先,抵押贷款份额较高的银行往往具有较低的ESG评级:抵押贷款强度每增加一个标准差,ESG综合得分就会降低约3分,环境支柱得分就会降低多达5分,而且在动态System-GMM模型中,抵押贷款的负相关性仍然是可见的。其次,在随机效应、固定效应和滞后固定效应规范中,消费者贷款强度与ESG评级呈正相关,特别是在环境和社会支柱方面,但这种关联在动态系统- gmm模型中没有统计学意义。第三,企业贷款敞口与整体ESG评级之间没有稳定的关系。我们将这些模式解释为与信任强度机制一致:ESG承诺和贷款技术似乎在抵押品丰富、标准化贷款和软信息零售活动中具有不同的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Economic Notes
Economic Notes ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: With articles that deal with the latest issues in banking, finance and monetary economics internationally, Economic Notes is an essential resource for anyone in the industry, helping you keep abreast of the latest developments in the field. Articles are written by top economists and executives working in financial institutions, firms and the public sector.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书