Activating the electrical energy flexibility of residential thermal systems: an analysis of non-technical barriers in six countries

Q2 Energy
David Ritter, Christoph Rohringer, Alireza Afshari, Manuel Andrés-Chicote, Pablo Hernandez-Cruz, Kaya Duenzen, Dierk Bauknecht, Shady Attia
{"title":"Activating the electrical energy flexibility of residential thermal systems: an analysis of non-technical barriers in six countries","authors":"David Ritter,&nbsp;Christoph Rohringer,&nbsp;Alireza Afshari,&nbsp;Manuel Andrés-Chicote,&nbsp;Pablo Hernandez-Cruz,&nbsp;Kaya Duenzen,&nbsp;Dierk Bauknecht,&nbsp;Shady Attia","doi":"10.1186/s42162-026-00673-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Decentralised energy flexibility in electricity systems faces a range of non-technical barriers that constrain widespread implementation. This study focuses on flexibility from residential heat pumps (HP), especially in combination with thermally activated building systems (TABS). It provides a comparative analysis of regulatory, financial and stakeholder-related barriers in Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Germany and Spain. Besides these types of barriers, the cross-country analytical framework is structured around specific flexibility use cases and utilisation mechanisms, which are schemes and market structures through which end-users’ flexibility can be activated. The analysis is based on expert consultations and a systematic review of scientific literature, offering insights into the multi-dimensional nature of the identified barriers. The findings highlight a significant disconnect between the technological availability of flexibility from residential heating systems and implementation. The main identified barriers are perceived high initial costs in combination with uncertain return on investments, insufficient awareness among end-users and professionals, reinforced by the insufficiently adopted regulatory setting. Insufficient regulatory consideration was identified, particularly for TABS, shortcomings in current energy policy frameworks were observed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":538,"journal":{"name":"Energy Informatics","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s42162-026-00673-2.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s42162-026-00673-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Energy","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Decentralised energy flexibility in electricity systems faces a range of non-technical barriers that constrain widespread implementation. This study focuses on flexibility from residential heat pumps (HP), especially in combination with thermally activated building systems (TABS). It provides a comparative analysis of regulatory, financial and stakeholder-related barriers in Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Germany and Spain. Besides these types of barriers, the cross-country analytical framework is structured around specific flexibility use cases and utilisation mechanisms, which are schemes and market structures through which end-users’ flexibility can be activated. The analysis is based on expert consultations and a systematic review of scientific literature, offering insights into the multi-dimensional nature of the identified barriers. The findings highlight a significant disconnect between the technological availability of flexibility from residential heating systems and implementation. The main identified barriers are perceived high initial costs in combination with uncertain return on investments, insufficient awareness among end-users and professionals, reinforced by the insufficiently adopted regulatory setting. Insufficient regulatory consideration was identified, particularly for TABS, shortcomings in current energy policy frameworks were observed.

激活住宅热系统的电能灵活性:六个国家的非技术壁垒分析
电力系统中分散的能源灵活性面临着一系列限制广泛实施的非技术障碍。本研究的重点是住宅热泵(HP)的灵活性,特别是与热激活建筑系统(TABS)的结合。它对奥地利、比利时、加拿大、丹麦、德国和西班牙的监管、金融和利益相关者相关障碍进行了比较分析。除了这些类型的障碍之外,跨国分析框架是围绕特定的灵活性用例和利用机制构建的,这些机制是可以激活最终用户灵活性的方案和市场结构。该分析基于专家咨询和对科学文献的系统审查,提供了对已确定障碍的多维性质的见解。研究结果强调了住宅供暖系统灵活性的技术可用性与实施之间的重大脱节。确定的主要障碍是认为初始成本高,加上投资回报不确定,最终用户和专业人员的认识不足,而没有充分采用的管理环境又加强了这些障碍。确定了监管考虑不足,特别是对tab,并观察到当前能源政策框架的缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Informatics
Energy Informatics Computer Science-Computer Networks and Communications
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书