Combining participatory approach and modeling to quantify spatial interdependencies in pest control services

IF 8.2 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Sandrine Petit, Hugues Boussard, Caroline Gibert, Diane Esquerré, Sylvain Poggi, Benoit Ricci, Juliette Young, Aude Vialatte
{"title":"Combining participatory approach and modeling to quantify spatial interdependencies in pest control services","authors":"Sandrine Petit,&nbsp;Hugues Boussard,&nbsp;Caroline Gibert,&nbsp;Diane Esquerré,&nbsp;Sylvain Poggi,&nbsp;Benoit Ricci,&nbsp;Juliette Young,&nbsp;Aude Vialatte","doi":"10.1007/s13593-026-01121-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Reinforcing the regulation of pests by their natural enemies is a promising way of reducing the use of pesticides and can be achieved through the adoption of management options at multiple scales, from field to landscape. In practice, however, most management efforts concentrate on modifying farming practices at the field level and examples of implementation of landscape-scale pest management strategies are scarce. Here, we report on place-based research that combined the co-design of scenarios of landscape-scale changes in farming practices and ex ante evaluation of pest control services under such scenarios, through the development of predictive models mobilizing long-term local data in two contrasting landscape case studies. We found that scenarios of farming change and predictive models of pest control services were site-specific. In both case studies, we show a high degree of spatial interdependency between farmers in the delivery of on-farm pest control services and, more importantly, that a wide adoption of pest control friendly-farming practices in the landscape leads to a win-win situation for each individual farmer. Farms that implemented changes were predicted to increase on-farm pest control services between 2% and 25%, depending on the changes in farming practices and case studies. When changes were implemented more widely at the landscape scale, the gain varied between 12.5% and 20% in farms where changes were implemented and between 9% and 12.5% in farms where no changes in practices were implemented. Additional gains were obtained when neighboring farmers collaborated and adjusted crop allocation on their farm in order to optimize pest control services at the landscape scale. This outcome reinforced the positive attitude of farmers towards the idea of acting collectively to promote pest control services, although such collective management was not perceived as being easy to implement and should be accompanied.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7721,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy for Sustainable Development","volume":"46 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13593-026-01121-x.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy for Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13593-026-01121-x","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reinforcing the regulation of pests by their natural enemies is a promising way of reducing the use of pesticides and can be achieved through the adoption of management options at multiple scales, from field to landscape. In practice, however, most management efforts concentrate on modifying farming practices at the field level and examples of implementation of landscape-scale pest management strategies are scarce. Here, we report on place-based research that combined the co-design of scenarios of landscape-scale changes in farming practices and ex ante evaluation of pest control services under such scenarios, through the development of predictive models mobilizing long-term local data in two contrasting landscape case studies. We found that scenarios of farming change and predictive models of pest control services were site-specific. In both case studies, we show a high degree of spatial interdependency between farmers in the delivery of on-farm pest control services and, more importantly, that a wide adoption of pest control friendly-farming practices in the landscape leads to a win-win situation for each individual farmer. Farms that implemented changes were predicted to increase on-farm pest control services between 2% and 25%, depending on the changes in farming practices and case studies. When changes were implemented more widely at the landscape scale, the gain varied between 12.5% and 20% in farms where changes were implemented and between 9% and 12.5% in farms where no changes in practices were implemented. Additional gains were obtained when neighboring farmers collaborated and adjusted crop allocation on their farm in order to optimize pest control services at the landscape scale. This outcome reinforced the positive attitude of farmers towards the idea of acting collectively to promote pest control services, although such collective management was not perceived as being easy to implement and should be accompanied.

结合参与式方法和建模,量化虫害防治服务的空间相互依赖关系
加强害虫天敌对害虫的管制是减少农药使用的一种很有希望的方法,可以通过在从田间到景观的多个尺度上采用管理办法来实现。然而,在实践中,大多数管理工作集中于修改田间一级的耕作方法,而实施景观规模虫害管理战略的例子很少。在这里,我们报告了一项基于地点的研究,该研究结合了农业实践景观尺度变化情景的共同设计和在这些情景下害虫防治服务的事前评估,通过开发预测模型,动员两个对比景观案例研究中的长期当地数据。我们发现耕作方式变化的情景和虫害防治服务的预测模型具有站点特异性。在这两个案例研究中,我们发现农民之间在提供农场害虫防治服务方面具有高度的空间相互依赖性,更重要的是,在景观中广泛采用害虫防治友好型耕作方法可以为每个农民带来双赢的局面。实施改革的农场预计将增加2%至25%的农场害虫防治服务,具体取决于农业实践和案例研究的变化。当在景观尺度上更广泛地实施变革时,在实施变革的农场中,收益在12.5%至20%之间,在没有实施变革的农场中,收益在9%至12.5%之间。当邻近的农民合作并调整其农场的作物分配,以优化景观尺度上的病虫害防治服务时,获得了额外的收益。这一结果加强了农民对集体行动促进虫害防治服务的想法的积极态度,尽管这种集体管理被认为不容易执行,应该同时进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agronomy for Sustainable Development
Agronomy for Sustainable Development 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
8.20%
发文量
108
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Agronomy for Sustainable Development (ASD) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal of international scope, dedicated to publishing original research articles, review articles, and meta-analyses aimed at improving sustainability in agricultural and food systems. The journal serves as a bridge between agronomy, cropping, and farming system research and various other disciplines including ecology, genetics, economics, and social sciences. ASD encourages studies in agroecology, participatory research, and interdisciplinary approaches, with a focus on systems thinking applied at different scales from field to global levels. Research articles published in ASD should present significant scientific advancements compared to existing knowledge, within an international context. Review articles should critically evaluate emerging topics, and opinion papers may also be submitted as reviews. Meta-analysis articles should provide clear contributions to resolving widely debated scientific questions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书