Clinical validation of video DASH for upper limb disorders in rheumatic patients

Reumatologia clinica Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-24 DOI:10.1016/j.reumae.2026.502192
David Vega-Morales, Talia Dinora Galván-Lara, Jorge Medina-Castillo, Pablo Herrera-Sandate, Luis Antonio Chavez-Alvarez, Paulina Valdés Torres, Ana Karen Vazquez-Bañuelos
{"title":"Clinical validation of video DASH for upper limb disorders in rheumatic patients","authors":"David Vega-Morales,&nbsp;Talia Dinora Galván-Lara,&nbsp;Jorge Medina-Castillo,&nbsp;Pablo Herrera-Sandate,&nbsp;Luis Antonio Chavez-Alvarez,&nbsp;Paulina Valdés Torres,&nbsp;Ana Karen Vazquez-Bañuelos","doi":"10.1016/j.reumae.2026.502192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) is a widely validated 30-item self-administered instrument used to quantify upper limb disability. In rheumatoid arthritis, limitations in construct validity have been reported in certain subgroups; therefore, a multimedia version (video-DASH), incorporating illustrative videos for each item, may improve comprehension and response consistency.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the psychometric properties and acceptability of the video-DASH in patients with rheumatological diseases affecting the upper limb.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>A prospective methodological validation study including 28 participants (≥18 years) with a confirmed rheumatological diagnosis involving the upper limb. Exclusion criteria were severe cognitive impairment, visual or hearing limitations precluding interaction with the multimedia version, and surgery or acute upper limb injury within the previous 3 months. The questionnaire was administered at three time points. Internal consistency (Cronbach's <em>α</em>), test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC), longitudinal comparisons (Wilcoxon test with Holm correction), and agreement (Bland–Altman analysis) were assessed. A comprehension and satisfaction survey was also administered.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Mean age was 55.5<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->9.06 years (34–72), and the predominant diagnosis was rheumatoid arthritis (92.9%). Mean scores decreased from 31.93 to 26.53 and 23.08, with significant differences across comparisons. Internal consistency was high (<em>α</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.961, 0.979, and 0.987), and reliability was adequate (ICC<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.785–0.940). Bland–Altman analysis showed minimal bias. All participants reported adequate comprehension and positive satisfaction.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The video-DASH demonstrates good reliability and acceptability, supporting its use as a tool to assess upper limb function in patients with rheumatic disease.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94193,"journal":{"name":"Reumatologia clinica","volume":"22 6","pages":"Article 502192"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reumatologia clinica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173574326000924","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) is a widely validated 30-item self-administered instrument used to quantify upper limb disability. In rheumatoid arthritis, limitations in construct validity have been reported in certain subgroups; therefore, a multimedia version (video-DASH), incorporating illustrative videos for each item, may improve comprehension and response consistency.

Objective

To evaluate the psychometric properties and acceptability of the video-DASH in patients with rheumatological diseases affecting the upper limb.

Materials and methods

A prospective methodological validation study including 28 participants (≥18 years) with a confirmed rheumatological diagnosis involving the upper limb. Exclusion criteria were severe cognitive impairment, visual or hearing limitations precluding interaction with the multimedia version, and surgery or acute upper limb injury within the previous 3 months. The questionnaire was administered at three time points. Internal consistency (Cronbach's α), test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC), longitudinal comparisons (Wilcoxon test with Holm correction), and agreement (Bland–Altman analysis) were assessed. A comprehension and satisfaction survey was also administered.

Results

Mean age was 55.5 ± 9.06 years (34–72), and the predominant diagnosis was rheumatoid arthritis (92.9%). Mean scores decreased from 31.93 to 26.53 and 23.08, with significant differences across comparisons. Internal consistency was high (α = 0.961, 0.979, and 0.987), and reliability was adequate (ICC = 0.785–0.940). Bland–Altman analysis showed minimal bias. All participants reported adequate comprehension and positive satisfaction.

Conclusion

The video-DASH demonstrates good reliability and acceptability, supporting its use as a tool to assess upper limb function in patients with rheumatic disease.
视频DASH治疗风湿病上肢疾患的临床验证。
手臂、肩膀和手的残疾(DASH)是一个广泛验证的30项自我管理的工具,用于量化上肢残疾。在类风湿关节炎中,在某些亚组中报道了结构效度的限制;因此,采用多媒体版本(video-DASH),为每个项目加入说明性视频,可以提高理解和反应的一致性。目的:评价视频dash在影响上肢的风湿病患者中的心理测量特性和可接受性。材料和方法:一项前瞻性方法学验证研究,包括28名确诊为上肢风湿病诊断的参与者(≥18岁)。排除标准是严重的认知障碍,视觉或听力限制,不能与多媒体版本交互,在过去3个月内手术或急性上肢损伤。问卷在三个时间点进行。评估内部一致性(Cronbach’s α)、重测信度(类内相关系数,ICC)、纵向比较(Wilcoxon检验与Holm校正)和一致性(Bland-Altman分析)。同时还进行了理解和满意度调查。结果:平均年龄55.5±9.06岁(34-72岁),以类风湿关节炎为主(92.9%)。平均得分从31.93分下降到26.53分和23.08分,比较差异有统计学意义。内部一致性高(α=0.961, 0.979, 0.987),信度足够(ICC=0.785-0.940)。Bland-Altman分析显示最小偏差。所有参与者都报告了足够的理解和积极的满意度。结论:视频dash具有良好的可靠性和可接受性,支持其作为评估风湿病患者上肢功能的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书