Gustavo Gonçalves Dos Santos, Anuli Njoku, Ana Carolina Pereira Mass, Ellen Eduarda Santos Ribeiro, Letícia Eduarda de Oliveira, Maria Julia Cunha Silva Lima, Taís de Abreu Ferro, Lilian Reinaldi Ribeiro Pirozi, Antônio Augusto de Freitas Peregrino, Célia Maria Pinheiro Dos Santos, Lucia Helena Ferreira Viana, Marilda Gonçalves de Sousa, Carla Helena Cappello, Cely de Oliveira, Luis Henrique de Andrade, Cindy Ferreira Lima, Isabelle Cristinne Pinto Costa
{"title":"Racial Disparities and the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Predicting Maternal Mortality: A Literature Review.","authors":"Gustavo Gonçalves Dos Santos, Anuli Njoku, Ana Carolina Pereira Mass, Ellen Eduarda Santos Ribeiro, Letícia Eduarda de Oliveira, Maria Julia Cunha Silva Lima, Taís de Abreu Ferro, Lilian Reinaldi Ribeiro Pirozi, Antônio Augusto de Freitas Peregrino, Célia Maria Pinheiro Dos Santos, Lucia Helena Ferreira Viana, Marilda Gonçalves de Sousa, Carla Helena Cappello, Cely de Oliveira, Luis Henrique de Andrade, Cindy Ferreira Lima, Isabelle Cristinne Pinto Costa","doi":"10.3390/epidemiologia7030081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Maternal mortality remains a major global health challenge, disproportionately affecting black and Indigenous women. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and postpartum hemorrhage are the leading direct causes of maternal death. Artificial intelligence (AI) tools have emerged as potential strategies for predicting these complications, yet concerns persist about their equity and validation across racial groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A rapid review was conducted in five databases, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus and LILACS, to synthesize recent evidence on the use of AI for preventing maternal mortality due to hypertension and postpartum hemorrhage. Studies published in the last five years that included racial or ethnic data were selected and analyzed narratively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten studies met the inclusion criteria, showing high predictive accuracy of AI models (AUROC often >0.95) for severe maternal outcomes. However, few models incorporated racial variables or underwent external validation in racially diverse or low-resource populations. Evidence suggests that unrepresentative datasets may perpetuate or exacerbate existing health inequities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AI demonstrates strong technical performance in predicting maternal complications but limited equity in application. Broader racial representation, external validation, and ethical governance are essential for ensuring that AI-based tools reduce rather than reinforce racial disparities in maternal mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":72944,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiolgia (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":"7 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13297638/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiolgia (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/epidemiologia7030081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Maternal mortality remains a major global health challenge, disproportionately affecting black and Indigenous women. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and postpartum hemorrhage are the leading direct causes of maternal death. Artificial intelligence (AI) tools have emerged as potential strategies for predicting these complications, yet concerns persist about their equity and validation across racial groups.
Methods: A rapid review was conducted in five databases, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus and LILACS, to synthesize recent evidence on the use of AI for preventing maternal mortality due to hypertension and postpartum hemorrhage. Studies published in the last five years that included racial or ethnic data were selected and analyzed narratively.
Results: Ten studies met the inclusion criteria, showing high predictive accuracy of AI models (AUROC often >0.95) for severe maternal outcomes. However, few models incorporated racial variables or underwent external validation in racially diverse or low-resource populations. Evidence suggests that unrepresentative datasets may perpetuate or exacerbate existing health inequities.
Conclusions: AI demonstrates strong technical performance in predicting maternal complications but limited equity in application. Broader racial representation, external validation, and ethical governance are essential for ensuring that AI-based tools reduce rather than reinforce racial disparities in maternal mortality.
背景:产妇死亡率仍然是一个重大的全球健康挑战,对黑人和土著妇女的影响尤为严重。妊娠期高血压疾病和产后出血是孕产妇死亡的主要直接原因。人工智能(AI)工具已经成为预测这些并发症的潜在策略,但人们仍然担心它们在种族群体中的公平性和有效性。方法:快速检索PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science、Scopus和LILACS 5个数据库,综合人工智能预防高血压和产后出血孕产妇死亡的最新证据。在过去五年中发表的包括种族或民族数据的研究被选中并进行叙述分析。结果:10项研究符合纳入标准,人工智能模型对严重孕产妇结局的预测准确率较高(AUROC通常为0.95)。然而,很少有模型纳入种族变量或在种族多样化或低资源人群中进行外部验证。有证据表明,不具代表性的数据集可能会延续或加剧现有的卫生不公平现象。结论:人工智能在预测产妇并发症方面表现出较强的技术性能,但应用公平性有限。更广泛的种族代表性、外部验证和道德治理对于确保基于人工智能的工具减少而不是加剧孕产妇死亡率的种族差异至关重要。