The Washington State Prescription Drug Affordability Board's selection of drugs for affordability review.

IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Douglas Barthold, Ryan Pistoresi, Marina Kawaguchi-Suzuki, Jingping Xing, Simon Borumand, Hung Truong, Gregory Gipson, Mike Neuenschwander
{"title":"The Washington State Prescription Drug Affordability Board's selection of drugs for affordability review.","authors":"Douglas Barthold, Ryan Pistoresi, Marina Kawaguchi-Suzuki, Jingping Xing, Simon Borumand, Hung Truong, Gregory Gipson, Mike Neuenschwander","doi":"10.18553/jmcp.2026.32.7.847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Washington State Prescription Drug Affordability Board (PDAB) is tasked with conducting affordability reviews to identify whether prescription drugs have excess costs, defined as either exceeding therapeutic value or being unsustainable to public and private health care systems. The PDAB also has the authority to set upper payment limits (UPLs). There has been limited reporting of the methods and decisions through which PDABs examine and choose drugs for affordability review.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the processes of identifying drugs eligible for affordability review and selecting drugs for affordability review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Branded drugs are eligible for affordability review if their wholesale acquisition cost (WAC) was at least $60,000 or their price increased above certain thresholds. Biosimilar products are eligible if their price was not at least 15% lower than the reference biologic product. Generic drugs are eligible if their WAC was at least $100 per 30-day supply and increased by at least 200% in a 12-month period. Eligible drugs were ranked according to 4 criteria with the following weights: total out-of-pocket costs (0.35), total costs (0.33), mean out-of-pocket costs among users (0.19), and total number of users (0.13).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>290 drug products were eligible in the 2023 drug review cycle. The majority (n = 166) were branded drugs, which were eligible because their WAC for a course of treatment was at least $60,000. After the weighted ranking of eligible drugs, the board chose the top 4 drugs for affordability review: Enbrel, Xtandi, Humira, and Cabometyx.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The selected drugs have high cost burden for patients and payers in Washington. Affordability reviews of these drugs will evaluate whether they have led or will lead to excess costs, which will inform PDAB decisions regarding the possible implementation of UPLs.</p>","PeriodicalId":16170,"journal":{"name":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","volume":"32 7","pages":"847-853"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13293489/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2026.32.7.847","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Washington State Prescription Drug Affordability Board (PDAB) is tasked with conducting affordability reviews to identify whether prescription drugs have excess costs, defined as either exceeding therapeutic value or being unsustainable to public and private health care systems. The PDAB also has the authority to set upper payment limits (UPLs). There has been limited reporting of the methods and decisions through which PDABs examine and choose drugs for affordability review.

Objective: To describe the processes of identifying drugs eligible for affordability review and selecting drugs for affordability review.

Methods: Branded drugs are eligible for affordability review if their wholesale acquisition cost (WAC) was at least $60,000 or their price increased above certain thresholds. Biosimilar products are eligible if their price was not at least 15% lower than the reference biologic product. Generic drugs are eligible if their WAC was at least $100 per 30-day supply and increased by at least 200% in a 12-month period. Eligible drugs were ranked according to 4 criteria with the following weights: total out-of-pocket costs (0.35), total costs (0.33), mean out-of-pocket costs among users (0.19), and total number of users (0.13).

Results: 290 drug products were eligible in the 2023 drug review cycle. The majority (n = 166) were branded drugs, which were eligible because their WAC for a course of treatment was at least $60,000. After the weighted ranking of eligible drugs, the board chose the top 4 drugs for affordability review: Enbrel, Xtandi, Humira, and Cabometyx.

Conclusions: The selected drugs have high cost burden for patients and payers in Washington. Affordability reviews of these drugs will evaluate whether they have led or will lead to excess costs, which will inform PDAB decisions regarding the possible implementation of UPLs.

华盛顿州处方药可负担性委员会对可负担性审查药物的选择。
背景:华盛顿州处方药可负担性委员会(PDAB)的任务是进行可负担性审查,以确定处方药是否有超额成本,定义为超过治疗价值或对公共和私人卫生保健系统不可持续。PDAB还具有设置支付上限的权限。关于pdb检查和选择药物进行可负担性审查的方法和决定的报道有限。目的:描述可负担性审查药品的认定和可负担性审查药品的选择过程。方法:如果品牌药的批发获取成本(WAC)至少为60,000美元或其价格超过一定的阈值,则有资格进行可负担性审查。如果生物仿制药的价格不低于参比生物制剂至少15%,则符合条件。如果仿制药的WAC至少为每30天供应100美元,并且在12个月内增加至少200%,则符合资格。按照总自付费用(0.35)、总费用(0.33)、使用者平均自付费用(0.19)、使用者总人数(0.13)4项指标的权重对符合条件的药品进行排序。结果:2023年药品审评周期有290个药品合格。大多数(n = 166)是品牌药,它们符合条件,因为它们一个疗程的WAC至少为6万美元。在对符合条件的药物进行加权排名后,委员会选择了可负担性评价最高的4种药物:Enbrel、Xtandi、Humira和Cabometyx。结论:所选药物对华盛顿地区患者和支付方均有较高的费用负担。这些药物的可负担性审查将评估它们是否导致或将导致额外的成本,这将为PDAB决定是否可能实施ups提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy
Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: JMCP welcomes research studies conducted outside of the United States that are relevant to our readership. Our audience is primarily concerned with designing policies of formulary coverage, health benefit design, and pharmaceutical programs that are based on evidence from large populations of people. Studies of pharmacist interventions conducted outside the United States that have already been extensively studied within the United States and studies of small sample sizes in non-managed care environments outside of the United States (e.g., hospitals or community pharmacies) are generally of low interest to our readership. However, studies of health outcomes and costs assessed in large populations that provide evidence for formulary coverage, health benefit design, and pharmaceutical programs are of high interest to JMCP’s readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书