US commercial health plan use of corticosteroids in step therapy protocols: Frequency and clinical appropriateness.

IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Yichen Lin, Lu Shi, Molly Beinfeld, Renee Campbell, James Chambers
{"title":"US commercial health plan use of corticosteroids in step therapy protocols: Frequency and clinical appropriateness.","authors":"Yichen Lin, Lu Shi, Molly Beinfeld, Renee Campbell, James Chambers","doi":"10.18553/jmcp.2026.32.7.773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Commercial health plans may include corticosteroids in step therapy protocols for specialty drugs as part of use management. However, alignment with regulatory and clinical guidance is not well characterized.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess how corticosteroids are incorporated into plan-imposed step therapy protocols and evaluate alignment with US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) labeling, clinical guidelines, and pivotal trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed coverage policies from 18 large US commercial health plans in the Tufts Medical Center Specialty Drug Evidence and Coverage Database, reflecting policies active as of August 2024. We identified drug-indication pairs for which at least 1 plan included corticosteroids in step therapy. For each drug-indication pair, we reviewed FDA labeling to determine whether prior corticosteroid failure was consistent with FDA-recommended use. When corticosteroid use was not specified by FDA labels, we examined pivotal clinical trials and clinical guidelines to assess support for corticosteroid use in step therapy. We also examined how health plans operationalized corticosteroid use (eg, systemic vs local use, single vs multiple steps, etc).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 201 specialty drug-indication pairs and 2,767 corresponding coverage policies for which at least 1 plan included corticosteroids in step therapy. Of these drug-indication pairs, 33 (16.4%) had an FDA label indication recommending prior corticosteroids use, whereas 168 (83.6%) did not. Among 2,210 coverage policies for the 168 pairs without FDA label-indicated prior corticosteroid use, 952 (43.1%) included corticosteroids in step therapy protocols. In 21% (200/952) of these policies, corticosteroid use was a mandatory step, whereas the remaining 79% (752/952) allowed patients to meet the requirement by failing alternative agents (eg, immunomodulators). In total, 63.8% (607/952) specified the use of corticosteroids to be systemic. Few protocols defined dosage requirements (7.9%, 75/952) or treatment failure criteria (3.8%, 36/952). Among policies in which FDA labeling did not specify prior corticosteroid use, plans were significantly more likely to include corticosteroids in step therapy when corticosteroid use was an eligibility criterion in pivotal clinical trials (<i>χ</i><sup>2</sup> [1, N = 2,198] = 31.2; <i>P</i> < .001) or strongly recommended in clinical guidelines (<i>χ</i><sup>2</sup> [1, N = 1,434] = 128.0; <i>P</i> < .001). Inclusion also varied across plans, ranging from 15% to 74% of policies without FDA label-indicated corticosteroid use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Commercial health plans frequently include corticosteroids in step therapy, including when not specified in FDA labeling. Substantial variation in implementation highlights opportunities to improve transparency and consistency.</p>","PeriodicalId":16170,"journal":{"name":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","volume":"32 7","pages":"773-781"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13294546/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2026.32.7.773","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Commercial health plans may include corticosteroids in step therapy protocols for specialty drugs as part of use management. However, alignment with regulatory and clinical guidance is not well characterized.

Objective: To assess how corticosteroids are incorporated into plan-imposed step therapy protocols and evaluate alignment with US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) labeling, clinical guidelines, and pivotal trials.

Methods: We analyzed coverage policies from 18 large US commercial health plans in the Tufts Medical Center Specialty Drug Evidence and Coverage Database, reflecting policies active as of August 2024. We identified drug-indication pairs for which at least 1 plan included corticosteroids in step therapy. For each drug-indication pair, we reviewed FDA labeling to determine whether prior corticosteroid failure was consistent with FDA-recommended use. When corticosteroid use was not specified by FDA labels, we examined pivotal clinical trials and clinical guidelines to assess support for corticosteroid use in step therapy. We also examined how health plans operationalized corticosteroid use (eg, systemic vs local use, single vs multiple steps, etc).

Results: We identified 201 specialty drug-indication pairs and 2,767 corresponding coverage policies for which at least 1 plan included corticosteroids in step therapy. Of these drug-indication pairs, 33 (16.4%) had an FDA label indication recommending prior corticosteroids use, whereas 168 (83.6%) did not. Among 2,210 coverage policies for the 168 pairs without FDA label-indicated prior corticosteroid use, 952 (43.1%) included corticosteroids in step therapy protocols. In 21% (200/952) of these policies, corticosteroid use was a mandatory step, whereas the remaining 79% (752/952) allowed patients to meet the requirement by failing alternative agents (eg, immunomodulators). In total, 63.8% (607/952) specified the use of corticosteroids to be systemic. Few protocols defined dosage requirements (7.9%, 75/952) or treatment failure criteria (3.8%, 36/952). Among policies in which FDA labeling did not specify prior corticosteroid use, plans were significantly more likely to include corticosteroids in step therapy when corticosteroid use was an eligibility criterion in pivotal clinical trials (χ2 [1, N = 2,198] = 31.2; P < .001) or strongly recommended in clinical guidelines (χ2 [1, N = 1,434] = 128.0; P < .001). Inclusion also varied across plans, ranging from 15% to 74% of policies without FDA label-indicated corticosteroid use.

Conclusions: Commercial health plans frequently include corticosteroids in step therapy, including when not specified in FDA labeling. Substantial variation in implementation highlights opportunities to improve transparency and consistency.

美国商业健康计划在步骤治疗方案中使用皮质类固醇:频率和临床适宜性。
背景:商业健康计划可能将皮质类固醇纳入特殊药物的阶梯治疗方案,作为使用管理的一部分。然而,与法规和临床指导的一致性并没有很好地表征。目的:评估皮质类固醇如何纳入计划实施的步骤治疗方案,并评估与美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)标签、临床指南和关键试验的一致性。方法:我们分析了Tufts医学中心专业药物证据和覆盖数据库中18个大型美国商业健康计划的覆盖政策,反映了截至2024年8月的有效政策。我们确定了至少有一种方案在分步治疗中包括皮质类固醇的药物适应证对。对于每一对药物适应症,我们回顾了FDA的标签,以确定先前的皮质类固醇失败是否符合FDA推荐的使用。当FDA标签中没有指定皮质类固醇的使用时,我们检查了关键的临床试验和临床指南,以评估在步骤治疗中使用皮质类固醇的支持。我们还研究了健康计划如何操作皮质类固醇的使用(例如,全身与局部使用,单步与多步等)。结果:我们确定了201个特殊药物适应症对和2767个相应的覆盖政策,其中至少有一个计划将皮质类固醇纳入步进治疗。在这些药物适应症对中,33个(16.4%)有FDA标签适应症推荐既往使用皮质类固醇,而168个(83.6%)没有。在2210份覆盖政策中,168对没有FDA标签指示既往使用皮质类固醇的患者,952(43.1%)将皮质类固醇纳入分步治疗方案。在21%(200/952)的政策中,皮质类固醇的使用是强制性的步骤,而剩下的79%(752/952)允许患者通过失败的替代药物(如免疫调节剂)来满足要求。总共有63.8%(607/952)指出皮质类固醇的使用是全身性的。很少有方案定义了剂量要求(7.9%,75/952)或治疗失败标准(3.8%,36/952)。在FDA标签中未指定既往使用皮质类固醇的政策中,当皮质类固醇使用是关键临床试验的合格标准时,计划更有可能将皮质类固醇纳入步进治疗(χ2 [1, N = 2198] = 31.2; P χ2 [1, N = 1434] = 128.0); P结论:商业健康计划经常将皮质类固醇纳入步进治疗,包括FDA标签中未指定的治疗。执行方面的巨大差异突出了提高透明度和一致性的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy
Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: JMCP welcomes research studies conducted outside of the United States that are relevant to our readership. Our audience is primarily concerned with designing policies of formulary coverage, health benefit design, and pharmaceutical programs that are based on evidence from large populations of people. Studies of pharmacist interventions conducted outside the United States that have already been extensively studied within the United States and studies of small sample sizes in non-managed care environments outside of the United States (e.g., hospitals or community pharmacies) are generally of low interest to our readership. However, studies of health outcomes and costs assessed in large populations that provide evidence for formulary coverage, health benefit design, and pharmaceutical programs are of high interest to JMCP’s readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书