Data availability and usability of a remote device for vital sign monitoring on general wards and home: a single-center prospective, observational study.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
A Jonkers, M de Groot, M Duijvestein, P R de Reuver, G Huisman-de Waal, S J H Bredie, I M Spenkelink
{"title":"Data availability and usability of a remote device for vital sign monitoring on general wards and home: a single-center prospective, observational study.","authors":"A Jonkers, M de Groot, M Duijvestein, P R de Reuver, G Huisman-de Waal, S J H Bredie, I M Spenkelink","doi":"10.1007/s10877-026-01448-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Continuous monitoring with wireless wearable devices enables early detection of clinical deterioration and supports post-discharge monitoring. This study evaluated data availability and patient usability of a novel upper-arm wearable sensor for continuous monitoring, on the general ward and at home, and compared its intramural performance with the current local standard. This prospective observational study was conducted at an academic hospital involving surgical and gastroenterological patients. The viQtor was used alongside ViSi Mobile during hospital admission and subsequently stand-alone for seven days post-discharge. Data availability was measured by analyzing the proportion of missing data, usability with the System Usability Scale (SUS), and data agreement by comparing in-hospital vital sign measurements between the viQtor and ViSi Mobile. Forty-five patients (median age 64 years) participated, of whom 35 (78%) continued using viQtor at home. Data gaps increased with patient activity during admission and at home. In-hospital data availability for the viQtor was similar for pulse rate (87% vs. 85%) but lower for respiratory rate (56% vs. 83%) and oxygen saturation (SpO₂) (48% vs. 84%) compared to ViSi Mobile. At home, the data availability of the viQtor for pulse rate, respiratory rate and SpO<sub>2</sub> was 77%, 46%, and 39%, respectively. ViQtor achieved a mean SUS score of 71.1, indicating acceptable usability. ViQtor showed slightly higher pulse rate values, and lower respiratory rate and SpO₂ values compared to ViSi Mobile. Data availability of the viQtor was high for pulse rate but limited for respiratory rate and SpO₂, compared to the ViSi Mobile. Activity lowered data availability of all parameters, particularly at home. Patient usability was acceptable. The viQtor showed small but significant vital-sign differences compared with the ViSi Mobile. Reducing activity-related data loss may further improve applicability for continuous monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":"1125-1135"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13562157/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-026-01448-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Continuous monitoring with wireless wearable devices enables early detection of clinical deterioration and supports post-discharge monitoring. This study evaluated data availability and patient usability of a novel upper-arm wearable sensor for continuous monitoring, on the general ward and at home, and compared its intramural performance with the current local standard. This prospective observational study was conducted at an academic hospital involving surgical and gastroenterological patients. The viQtor was used alongside ViSi Mobile during hospital admission and subsequently stand-alone for seven days post-discharge. Data availability was measured by analyzing the proportion of missing data, usability with the System Usability Scale (SUS), and data agreement by comparing in-hospital vital sign measurements between the viQtor and ViSi Mobile. Forty-five patients (median age 64 years) participated, of whom 35 (78%) continued using viQtor at home. Data gaps increased with patient activity during admission and at home. In-hospital data availability for the viQtor was similar for pulse rate (87% vs. 85%) but lower for respiratory rate (56% vs. 83%) and oxygen saturation (SpO₂) (48% vs. 84%) compared to ViSi Mobile. At home, the data availability of the viQtor for pulse rate, respiratory rate and SpO2 was 77%, 46%, and 39%, respectively. ViQtor achieved a mean SUS score of 71.1, indicating acceptable usability. ViQtor showed slightly higher pulse rate values, and lower respiratory rate and SpO₂ values compared to ViSi Mobile. Data availability of the viQtor was high for pulse rate but limited for respiratory rate and SpO₂, compared to the ViSi Mobile. Activity lowered data availability of all parameters, particularly at home. Patient usability was acceptable. The viQtor showed small but significant vital-sign differences compared with the ViSi Mobile. Reducing activity-related data loss may further improve applicability for continuous monitoring.

用于普通病房和家庭生命体征监测的远程设备的数据可用性和可用性:一项单中心前瞻性观察研究。
无线可穿戴设备的连续监测可以早期发现临床恶化,并支持出院后监测。本研究评估了一种用于普通病房和家庭连续监测的新型上臂可穿戴传感器的数据可用性和患者可用性,并将其内部性能与当前的当地标准进行了比较。这项前瞻性观察研究是在一家学术医院进行的,涉及外科和胃肠病学患者。viQtor在住院期间与ViSi Mobile一起使用,随后在出院后独立使用7天。通过分析缺失数据的比例、系统可用性量表(SUS)的可用性以及通过比较viQtor和ViSi Mobile之间的住院生命体征测量数据的数据一致性来衡量数据的可用性。45例患者(中位年龄64岁)参与其中,其中35例(78%)继续在家中使用viQtor。数据差距随着患者入院和在家活动的增加而增加。与ViSi Mobile相比,viQtor的脉搏率(87%对85%)的住院数据可用性相似,但呼吸率(56%对83%)和氧饱和度(SpO₂)(48%对84%)的可用性较低。在家中,viQtor的脉搏率、呼吸率和SpO2数据可用性分别为77%、46%和39%。ViQtor的平均SUS得分为71.1,表明可用性是可以接受的。与ViSi Mobile相比,ViQtor的脉搏率略高,呼吸率和SpO₂值较低。与ViSi Mobile相比,viQtor的脉搏率数据利用率较高,但呼吸率和SpO₂数据利用率较低。活动降低了所有参数的数据可用性,特别是在家中。病人的可用性是可以接受的。与ViSi Mobile相比,viQtor显示出微小但显著的生命体征差异。减少与活动相关的数据丢失可以进一步提高连续监测的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.60%
发文量
144
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing is a clinical journal publishing papers related to technology in the fields of anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, emergency medicine, and peri-operative medicine. The journal has links with numerous specialist societies, including editorial board representatives from the European Society for Computing and Technology in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (ESCTAIC), the Society for Technology in Anesthesia (STA), the Society for Complex Acute Illness (SCAI) and the NAVAt (NAVigating towards your Anaestheisa Targets) group. The journal publishes original papers, narrative and systematic reviews, technological notes, letters to the editor, editorial or commentary papers, and policy statements or guidelines from national or international societies. The journal encourages debate on published papers and technology, including letters commenting on previous publications or technological concerns. The journal occasionally publishes special issues with technological or clinical themes, or reports and abstracts from scientificmeetings. Special issues proposals should be sent to the Editor-in-Chief. Specific details of types of papers, and the clinical and technological content of papers considered within scope can be found in instructions for authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书