Razanne Oueini, Ben Shirley, Christie Teigland, Melissa Castora-Binkley, Scott Bilder, Kiran Sunkari, Lynn Pezzullo
{"title":"Changes in persistence to basal insulin following the Medicare out-of-pocket cost cap.","authors":"Razanne Oueini, Ben Shirley, Christie Teigland, Melissa Castora-Binkley, Scott Bilder, Kiran Sunkari, Lynn Pezzullo","doi":"10.37765/ajmc.2026.89963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate changes in persistence to basal insulin following the implementation of the $35 monthly out-of-pocket cost cap for insulin for Medicare beneficiaries.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We completed a retrospective cohort analysis of a nationally representative Medicare Advantage sample from 2022 to 2023.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared precap rates of persistence to basal insulin in 2022 with postcap rates in 2023 using Persistence to Basal Insulin, a health plan performance measure used in Medicare Part D quality programs, among the study population and multiple subgroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A statistically significant increase (+1.3 percentage points; P < .001) was seen in overall patient persistence to basal insulin in the first year of the implementation of the insulin cost cap. Subgroup analyses showed greater increases in persistence in several subpopulations, including patients aged 45 to 54 and 65 to 74 years, male patients, non-Hispanic Black patients, and patients residing in certain census divisions, especially those with a high prevalence of type 2 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In addition to providing financial relief to Medicare patients, the implementation of the insulin cost cap was associated with an improvement in patients' treatment persistence to basal insulin therapy, a measure associated with positive health and economic outcomes. These results lend useful insight into future policy evaluations and proposals that seek to improve treatment access and address disparities in appropriate medication use.</p>","PeriodicalId":50808,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Managed Care","volume":"32 6","pages":"e212-e216"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Managed Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2026.89963","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate changes in persistence to basal insulin following the implementation of the $35 monthly out-of-pocket cost cap for insulin for Medicare beneficiaries.
Study design: We completed a retrospective cohort analysis of a nationally representative Medicare Advantage sample from 2022 to 2023.
Methods: We compared precap rates of persistence to basal insulin in 2022 with postcap rates in 2023 using Persistence to Basal Insulin, a health plan performance measure used in Medicare Part D quality programs, among the study population and multiple subgroups.
Results: A statistically significant increase (+1.3 percentage points; P < .001) was seen in overall patient persistence to basal insulin in the first year of the implementation of the insulin cost cap. Subgroup analyses showed greater increases in persistence in several subpopulations, including patients aged 45 to 54 and 65 to 74 years, male patients, non-Hispanic Black patients, and patients residing in certain census divisions, especially those with a high prevalence of type 2 diabetes.
Conclusions: In addition to providing financial relief to Medicare patients, the implementation of the insulin cost cap was associated with an improvement in patients' treatment persistence to basal insulin therapy, a measure associated with positive health and economic outcomes. These results lend useful insight into future policy evaluations and proposals that seek to improve treatment access and address disparities in appropriate medication use.
目的:评估实施每月35美元的医疗保险受益人自付胰岛素费用上限后基础胰岛素持续使用的变化。研究设计:我们完成了2022年至2023年具有全国代表性的医疗保险优势样本的回顾性队列分析。方法:在研究人群和多个亚组中,我们使用基础胰岛素持久性(Medicare Part D质量项目中使用的健康计划绩效指标)比较了2022年持续使用基础胰岛素的术前率和2023年持续使用基础胰岛素的后率。结论:除了为医疗保险患者提供经济救济外,胰岛素成本上限的实施还与患者坚持基础胰岛素治疗的改善有关,这是一项与积极的健康和经济结果相关的措施。这些结果为未来的政策评估和建议提供了有用的见解,这些评估和建议旨在改善治疗可及性并解决适当药物使用方面的差异。
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Managed Care is an independent, peer-reviewed publication dedicated to disseminating clinical information to managed care physicians, clinical decision makers, and other healthcare professionals. Its aim is to stimulate scientific communication in the ever-evolving field of managed care. The American Journal of Managed Care addresses a broad range of issues relevant to clinical decision making in a cost-constrained environment and examines the impact of clinical, management, and policy interventions and programs on healthcare and economic outcomes.