Effects of Insomnia, Anxiety and Depression on Clinical Outcomes of Frozen Shoulder After Manipulation Under Anesthesia.

IF 1.7 Q3 REHABILITATION
Fei Lu, Zhenyu Hu, Lingfang Shen, Yejun Hu, Xinji Wang, Xinxin Wang, Dengfeng Ruan, Hengzhi Liu, Honglu Cai, Weiliang Shen
{"title":"Effects of Insomnia, Anxiety and Depression on Clinical Outcomes of Frozen Shoulder After Manipulation Under Anesthesia.","authors":"Fei Lu, Zhenyu Hu, Lingfang Shen, Yejun Hu, Xinji Wang, Xinxin Wang, Dengfeng Ruan, Hengzhi Liu, Honglu Cai, Weiliang Shen","doi":"10.1002/pri.70264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Frozen shoulder is a common disorder causing pain, stiffness, disability, and sleep disturbance. While often linked to psychological comorbidities, the impact of preoperative mental health and insomnia on recovery outcomes remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of preoperative anxiety, depression, and insomnia on postoperative recovery in patients undergoing manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) for frozen shoulder.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a secondary analysis of a prospective observational cohort study. A total of 197 patients with primary frozen shoulder were enrolled and treated with MUA. Preoperatively, the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) classified patients: 33 with clinical insomnia (ISI ≥ 15) and 45 with psychological distress (PD, including anxiety or depression, HADS anxiety ≥ 8 and depression ≥ 8). Shoulder passive range of motion (ROM), pain (visual analog scale, VAS), and functional scores (Constant-Murley Score [CMS], Oxford Shoulder Score [OSS]) were assessed at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. Outcomes were compared between patients with/without insomnia or PD. To control for multiple comparisons, all p-values were adjusted using the False Discovery Rate (FDR) method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the insomnia analysis, the insomnia group had a significantly lower proportion of male patients (12.1% vs. 28.7%, p = 0.048) and a lower mean BMI (22.0 ± 2.4 vs. 23.0 ± 2.7, p = 0.033) compared to the group without insomnia. Furthermore, baseline abduction was significantly more restricted in the insomnia group (67.2° ± 21.9 vs. 81.8° ± 24.8, p = 0.001) and OSS was significantly worse (38.5 ± 8.1 vs. 32.6 ± 5.5, p < 0.001). Preoperative PD was more common in right-side cases (60.0% vs. 42.8%, p = 0.042) and was associated with worse baseline external rotation. Following MUA, all patient groups achieved substantial clinical improvement. At 3 and 6 months postoperatively, after FDR adjustment, there were no statistically significant or clinically meaningful differences in ROM, VAS, CMS, or OSS between patients with and without insomnia, nor between patients with and without PD. All observed mean differences between groups were small and fell well below established minimal clinically important difference (MCID) thresholds (e.g., at 6 months, CMS mean difference between PD and no PD was 1.84 [95% CI -0.92 to 4.60]; adjusted p = 0.796).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Although preoperative clinical insomnia and PD are associated with worse baseline pain and functional presentation, they were not associated with poorer postoperative recovery following MUA in this cohort. At the 3 and 6 months postoperative follow-ups, there were no statistical differences in pain or ROM between patients with and without these preoperative conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":47243,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Research International","volume":"31 3","pages":"e70264"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Research International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.70264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Frozen shoulder is a common disorder causing pain, stiffness, disability, and sleep disturbance. While often linked to psychological comorbidities, the impact of preoperative mental health and insomnia on recovery outcomes remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of preoperative anxiety, depression, and insomnia on postoperative recovery in patients undergoing manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) for frozen shoulder.

Methods: This study was a secondary analysis of a prospective observational cohort study. A total of 197 patients with primary frozen shoulder were enrolled and treated with MUA. Preoperatively, the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) classified patients: 33 with clinical insomnia (ISI ≥ 15) and 45 with psychological distress (PD, including anxiety or depression, HADS anxiety ≥ 8 and depression ≥ 8). Shoulder passive range of motion (ROM), pain (visual analog scale, VAS), and functional scores (Constant-Murley Score [CMS], Oxford Shoulder Score [OSS]) were assessed at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. Outcomes were compared between patients with/without insomnia or PD. To control for multiple comparisons, all p-values were adjusted using the False Discovery Rate (FDR) method.

Results: In the insomnia analysis, the insomnia group had a significantly lower proportion of male patients (12.1% vs. 28.7%, p = 0.048) and a lower mean BMI (22.0 ± 2.4 vs. 23.0 ± 2.7, p = 0.033) compared to the group without insomnia. Furthermore, baseline abduction was significantly more restricted in the insomnia group (67.2° ± 21.9 vs. 81.8° ± 24.8, p = 0.001) and OSS was significantly worse (38.5 ± 8.1 vs. 32.6 ± 5.5, p < 0.001). Preoperative PD was more common in right-side cases (60.0% vs. 42.8%, p = 0.042) and was associated with worse baseline external rotation. Following MUA, all patient groups achieved substantial clinical improvement. At 3 and 6 months postoperatively, after FDR adjustment, there were no statistically significant or clinically meaningful differences in ROM, VAS, CMS, or OSS between patients with and without insomnia, nor between patients with and without PD. All observed mean differences between groups were small and fell well below established minimal clinically important difference (MCID) thresholds (e.g., at 6 months, CMS mean difference between PD and no PD was 1.84 [95% CI -0.92 to 4.60]; adjusted p = 0.796).

Discussion: Although preoperative clinical insomnia and PD are associated with worse baseline pain and functional presentation, they were not associated with poorer postoperative recovery following MUA in this cohort. At the 3 and 6 months postoperative follow-ups, there were no statistical differences in pain or ROM between patients with and without these preoperative conditions.

失眠、焦虑和抑郁对麻醉下肩周炎手术后临床预后的影响。
背景和目的:肩周炎是一种常见的疾病,可引起疼痛、僵硬、残疾和睡眠障碍。虽然通常与心理合并症有关,但术前心理健康和失眠对康复结果的影响尚不清楚。本研究的目的是探讨术前焦虑、抑郁和失眠对实施麻醉下操作(MUA)治疗肩关节冷冻患者术后恢复的影响。方法:本研究是一项前瞻性观察队列研究的二次分析。共有197例原发性肩周炎患者接受了MUA治疗。术前采用失眠严重程度指数(ISI)和医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)对患者进行分类:临床失眠33例(ISI≥15),心理困扰45例(PD,包括焦虑或抑郁,HADS焦虑≥8,抑郁≥8)。术后3个月和6个月分别评估肩部被动活动度(ROM)、疼痛(视觉模拟量表,VAS)和功能评分(Constant-Murley评分[CMS]、牛津肩部评分[OSS])。比较有/没有失眠或PD的患者的结果。为了控制多重比较,所有p值都使用错误发现率(FDR)方法进行调整。结果:在失眠症分析中,失眠症组男性患者比例明显低于无失眠症组(12.1%比28.7%,p = 0.048),平均BMI低于无失眠症组(22.0±2.4比23.0±2.7,p = 0.033)。此外,失眠组的基线外展明显受限(67.2°±21.9比81.8°±24.8,p = 0.001), OSS明显更差(38.5±8.1比32.6±5.5,p)。讨论:尽管术前临床失眠和PD与更差的基线疼痛和功能表现相关,但在该队列中,它们与MUA后较差的术后恢复无关。在术后3个月和6个月的随访中,有和没有这些术前条件的患者在疼痛或ROM方面没有统计学差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Physiotherapy Research International is an international peer reviewed journal dedicated to the exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to specialist areas of physiotherapy theory, practice, and research. Our aim is to promote a high level of scholarship and build on the current evidence base to inform the advancement of the physiotherapy profession. We publish original research on a wide range of topics e.g. Primary research testing new physiotherapy treatments; methodological research; measurement and outcome research and qualitative research of interest to researchers, clinicians and educators. Further, we aim to publish high quality papers that represent the range of cultures and settings where physiotherapy services are delivered. We attract a wide readership from physiotherapists and others working in diverse clinical and academic settings. We aim to promote an international debate amongst the profession about current best evidence based practice. Papers are directed primarily towards the physiotherapy profession, but can be relevant to a wide range of professional groups. The growth of interdisciplinary research is also key to our aims and scope, and we encourage relevant submissions from other professional groups. The journal actively encourages submissions which utilise a breadth of different methodologies and research designs to facilitate addressing key questions related to the physiotherapy practice. PRI seeks to encourage good quality topical debates on a range of relevant issues and promote critical reflection on decision making and implementation of physiotherapy interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书