Developing a Logic Model Framework for the Academy for Women in Academic Emergency Medicine (AWAEM).

IF 1.6 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
AEM Education and Training Pub Date : 2026-06-21 eCollection Date: 2026-06-01 DOI:10.1002/aet2.70222
Amy Zeidan, Laura E Walker, Margaret Samuels-Kalow, Rama A Salhi, Joe-Ann S Moser, Jennifer S Love, Pooja Agrawal
{"title":"Developing a Logic Model Framework for the Academy for Women in Academic Emergency Medicine (AWAEM).","authors":"Amy Zeidan, Laura E Walker, Margaret Samuels-Kalow, Rama A Salhi, Joe-Ann S Moser, Jennifer S Love, Pooja Agrawal","doi":"10.1002/aet2.70222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Academy for Women in Academic Emergency Medicine (AWAEM) within the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine was established to advance the recruitment, promotion, retention, and career satisfaction of women in academic emergency medicine (AEM). Despite progress, persistent gender disparities remain in several areas, including compensation, promotion, and leadership representation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To better assess and evaluate current AWAEM programming, we developed a logic model to visually and systematically map AWAEM activities and initiatives with current and future metrics for evaluation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The logic model was guided by AWAEM's strategic plan and developed through an iterative process involving feedback from AWAEM members and leaders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The model outlines key inputs, describes activities categorized across five thematic areas, and identifies tangible outputs with corresponding metrics for those activities. The model concludes with short-, intermediate-, and long-term outcomes that speak to the likely impact of AWAEM's programming.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The proposed logic model serves as a practical framework to align AWAEM's efforts to outcomes while also embedding evaluation into ongoing programming. It provides a visual tool for identifying gaps and incorporating data-driven modifications, as well as facilitating collaboration across the academy. While there are limitations to this logic model, it provides an initial roadmap and foundation for strategic planning and evaluation. It also provides an opportunity to periodically revise the model as AWAEM's needs evolve to ensure continued relevance and alignment with the needs of the entire membership. Additionally, this model can serve as a framework for other professional development groups, academies, and societies external to SAEM.</p>","PeriodicalId":37032,"journal":{"name":"AEM Education and Training","volume":"10 3","pages":"e70222"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13284284/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AEM Education and Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/aet2.70222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Academy for Women in Academic Emergency Medicine (AWAEM) within the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine was established to advance the recruitment, promotion, retention, and career satisfaction of women in academic emergency medicine (AEM). Despite progress, persistent gender disparities remain in several areas, including compensation, promotion, and leadership representation.

Objective: To better assess and evaluate current AWAEM programming, we developed a logic model to visually and systematically map AWAEM activities and initiatives with current and future metrics for evaluation.

Methods: The logic model was guided by AWAEM's strategic plan and developed through an iterative process involving feedback from AWAEM members and leaders.

Results: The model outlines key inputs, describes activities categorized across five thematic areas, and identifies tangible outputs with corresponding metrics for those activities. The model concludes with short-, intermediate-, and long-term outcomes that speak to the likely impact of AWAEM's programming.

Discussion: The proposed logic model serves as a practical framework to align AWAEM's efforts to outcomes while also embedding evaluation into ongoing programming. It provides a visual tool for identifying gaps and incorporating data-driven modifications, as well as facilitating collaboration across the academy. While there are limitations to this logic model, it provides an initial roadmap and foundation for strategic planning and evaluation. It also provides an opportunity to periodically revise the model as AWAEM's needs evolve to ensure continued relevance and alignment with the needs of the entire membership. Additionally, this model can serve as a framework for other professional development groups, academies, and societies external to SAEM.

为急诊医学学术妇女学院(AWAEM)制定逻辑模型框架。
背景:隶属于学术急诊医学学会的学术急诊医学女性学院(AWAEM)的成立是为了促进学术急诊医学(AEM)女性的招聘、晋升、保留和职业满意度。尽管取得了进步,但在薪酬、晋升和领导代表性等几个领域,性别差距仍然存在。目的:为了更好地评估和评估当前的AWAEM规划,我们开发了一个逻辑模型,以可视化和系统地映射AWAEM活动和计划,以及当前和未来的评估指标。方法:以AWAEM的战略规划为指导,通过AWAEM成员和领导反馈的迭代过程开发逻辑模型。结果:该模型概述了关键投入,描述了分为五个主题领域的活动,并确定了具有这些活动相应指标的有形产出。该模型总结了短期、中期和长期结果,说明了AWAEM规划的可能影响。讨论:提出的逻辑模型作为一个实用的框架,使AWAEM的工作与结果保持一致,同时也将评估嵌入到正在进行的规划中。它提供了一个可视化的工具,用于识别差距和合并数据驱动的修改,以及促进整个学院的协作。尽管这种逻辑模型存在局限性,但它为战略规划和评估提供了初步的路线图和基础。它还提供了一个机会,可以随着AWAEM需求的发展而定期修改模型,以确保与整个成员的需求保持相关性和一致性。此外,该模型可以作为SAEM外部的其他专业发展团体、学院和社团的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AEM Education and Training
AEM Education and Training Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
22.20%
发文量
89
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书