Refractive and Visual Outcomes in Unilateral Duane Retraction Syndrome: Influence of Ocular Motility.

Q3 Medicine
Barbaros Hayrettin Ünlü, Özlem Ural Fatihoğlu, Ceren Durmaz Engin, Aylin Yaman, Ayşe Tülin Berk
{"title":"Refractive and Visual Outcomes in Unilateral Duane Retraction Syndrome: Influence of Ocular Motility.","authors":"Barbaros Hayrettin Ünlü, Özlem Ural Fatihoğlu, Ceren Durmaz Engin, Aylin Yaman, Ayşe Tülin Berk","doi":"10.4274/tjo.galenos.2026.79815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the refractive profiles and clinical characteristics of affected and fellow eyes in unilateral Duane retraction syndrome (DRS), emphasize subtype-related variations, and assess the impact of motility restriction and ocular findings on refractive status.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective cross-sectional study included 191 patients with unilateral DRS, comprising type I (n=162), type II (n=7), and type III (n=22). Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), cycloplegic autorefraction, astigmatism classification, and ocular alignment/motility findings were analyzed across DRS subtypes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age at examination was 6.67±7.13 years, and 62.3% of the patients were female. Amblyopia was observed in 23.0% of patients, anisometropia in 18.6%, and abnormal head posture in 52.7% of patients. Esotropia (42.0%) was more prevalent than exotropia (11.7%), and the majority of patients (61.4%) exhibited grade 4 horizontal limitation. Compared with fellow eyes, DRS eyes exhibited a substantially lower BCVA (p<0.001), higher spherical power (p=0.025), and greater cylindrical power (p<0.001). In both DRS (60.7%) and non-DRS (72.3%) eyes, the predominant pattern was with-the-rule astigmatism. There were no discernible variations in astigmatism subtypes among motility limitation grades or DRS subtypes. The cylindrical refractive error was independently associated with abnormal head posture (p=0.007) and horizontal deviation type (p=0.029) according to multiple regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Unilateral DRS is characterized by diminished visual function and increased refractive error, with cylindrical outcomes affected by head posture and type of deviation. The findings highlight the importance of integrating motility parameters into refractive evaluation and surgical planning in DRS.</p>","PeriodicalId":23373,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"56 3","pages":"158-165"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13294639/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/tjo.galenos.2026.79815","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the refractive profiles and clinical characteristics of affected and fellow eyes in unilateral Duane retraction syndrome (DRS), emphasize subtype-related variations, and assess the impact of motility restriction and ocular findings on refractive status.

Materials and methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study included 191 patients with unilateral DRS, comprising type I (n=162), type II (n=7), and type III (n=22). Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), cycloplegic autorefraction, astigmatism classification, and ocular alignment/motility findings were analyzed across DRS subtypes.

Results: The mean age at examination was 6.67±7.13 years, and 62.3% of the patients were female. Amblyopia was observed in 23.0% of patients, anisometropia in 18.6%, and abnormal head posture in 52.7% of patients. Esotropia (42.0%) was more prevalent than exotropia (11.7%), and the majority of patients (61.4%) exhibited grade 4 horizontal limitation. Compared with fellow eyes, DRS eyes exhibited a substantially lower BCVA (p<0.001), higher spherical power (p=0.025), and greater cylindrical power (p<0.001). In both DRS (60.7%) and non-DRS (72.3%) eyes, the predominant pattern was with-the-rule astigmatism. There were no discernible variations in astigmatism subtypes among motility limitation grades or DRS subtypes. The cylindrical refractive error was independently associated with abnormal head posture (p=0.007) and horizontal deviation type (p=0.029) according to multiple regression analysis.

Conclusion: Unilateral DRS is characterized by diminished visual function and increased refractive error, with cylindrical outcomes affected by head posture and type of deviation. The findings highlight the importance of integrating motility parameters into refractive evaluation and surgical planning in DRS.

单侧Duane挛缩综合征的屈光和视力结果:眼球运动的影响。
目的:比较单侧Duane后缩综合征(DRS)患者的屈光特征和临床特征,强调亚型相关变异,并评估运动限制和眼部表现对屈光状态的影响。材料和方法:本回顾性横断面研究纳入191例单侧DRS患者,包括I型(n=162)、II型(n=7)和III型(n=22)。对DRS亚型的最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、睫状体麻痹性自屈光、散光分类和眼部排列/运动结果进行分析。结果:患者平均年龄为6.67±7.13岁,女性占62.3%。弱视占23.0%,屈光参差占18.6%,头位异常占52.7%。内斜视(42.0%)比外斜视(11.7%)更为普遍,大多数患者(61.4%)表现为4级水平受限。与其他眼相比,DRS眼的BCVA明显降低(p结论:单侧DRS的特点是视觉功能下降和屈光不正增加,其圆柱形结果受头部姿势和偏差类型的影响。研究结果强调了将运动参数整合到DRS屈光评估和手术计划中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology
Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology Medicine-Ophthalmology
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology (TJO) is the only scientific periodical publication of the Turkish Ophthalmological Association and has been published since January 1929. In its early years, the journal was published in Turkish and French. Although there were temporary interruptions in the publication of the journal due to various challenges, the Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology has been published continually from 1971 to the present. The target audience includes specialists and physicians in training in ophthalmology in all relevant disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书