{"title":"Blood-Based Inflammatory and Metabolic Biomarkers for Assessing Symptom Burden and Quality of Life in Older Adults with Cancer: A Narrative Review.","authors":"Lu Lu, Yu Zhang","doi":"10.2147/TCRM.S611486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To evaluate the clinical utility of blood-based inflammatory and metabolic biomarkers in assessing symptom burden and quality of life among older adults with cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review synthesizes current evidence regarding the clinical utility and underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of blood-based biomarkers, focusing particularly on the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), and modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Elevated inflammatory markers, such as NLR and SII, independently correlate with increased frailty and functional decline. Concurrently, nutritional-metabolic markers, including hypoalbuminemia and a high mGPS, are strongly associated with anorexia and cancer cachexia. These composite indicators effectively capture the synergistic effects of \"inflammaging\", neuroinflammation, and tumor-driven metabolic reprogramming.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Objective, cost-effective, and dynamically measurable inflammatory and metabolic biomarkers represent promising adjunctive tools for early symptom screening. The integration of these markers into comprehensive geriatric assessments may enhance risk stratification and symptom management. However, current evidence is constrained by study heterogeneity, retrospective designs, a lack of standardized cutoffs, and insufficient prospective validation in older cancer populations. Therefore, these biomarkers should be regarded as complementary to traditional assessments rather than definitive standalone tools.</p>","PeriodicalId":22977,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management","volume":"22 ","pages":"611486"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13285912/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S611486","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: To evaluate the clinical utility of blood-based inflammatory and metabolic biomarkers in assessing symptom burden and quality of life among older adults with cancer.
Methods: This review synthesizes current evidence regarding the clinical utility and underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of blood-based biomarkers, focusing particularly on the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), and modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS).
Results: Elevated inflammatory markers, such as NLR and SII, independently correlate with increased frailty and functional decline. Concurrently, nutritional-metabolic markers, including hypoalbuminemia and a high mGPS, are strongly associated with anorexia and cancer cachexia. These composite indicators effectively capture the synergistic effects of "inflammaging", neuroinflammation, and tumor-driven metabolic reprogramming.
Conclusion: Objective, cost-effective, and dynamically measurable inflammatory and metabolic biomarkers represent promising adjunctive tools for early symptom screening. The integration of these markers into comprehensive geriatric assessments may enhance risk stratification and symptom management. However, current evidence is constrained by study heterogeneity, retrospective designs, a lack of standardized cutoffs, and insufficient prospective validation in older cancer populations. Therefore, these biomarkers should be regarded as complementary to traditional assessments rather than definitive standalone tools.
期刊介绍:
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management is an international, peer-reviewed journal of clinical therapeutics and risk management, focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical studies in all therapeutic areas, outcomes, safety, and programs for the effective, safe, and sustained use of medicines, therapeutic and surgical interventions in all clinical areas.
The journal welcomes submissions covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary. The journal will consider case reports but only if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature.
As of 18th March 2019, Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.
The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.