Xing Li, Eli Patt, Madeline Koehn, Michael Hu, Ana Cecilia Zenteno Langle, Hrudya Viswanadh, Erin Stewart, Duncan J Flynn, Amandeep Singh
{"title":"Throughput Benchmarking and Throughput Variance Analysis to Evaluate the Efficiency of an Outpatient Endoscopy Unit.","authors":"Xing Li, Eli Patt, Madeline Koehn, Michael Hu, Ana Cecilia Zenteno Langle, Hrudya Viswanadh, Erin Stewart, Duncan J Flynn, Amandeep Singh","doi":"10.1007/s10916-026-02427-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rising demand for colorectal cancer screening has increased colonoscopy volume, producing backlogs and prolonged wait times. Commonly used metrics such as room utilization provide limited insight into actionable drivers of efficiency; we applied a novel throughput benchmarking framework to quantify performance and identify operational sources of inefficiency. We conducted a pilot study in a four-room outpatient endoscopy unit from July-December 2022. Using routinely recorded timestamps for procedural stages, we derived a realistic daily target throughput (RDTT). Monthly realistic target throughput (RMTT) was calculated from RDTT. Actual monthly throughput (AMT) was benchmarked against RMTT to generate a throughput efficiency ratio (TER = AMT/RMTT) and throughput variance (TV = RMTT - AMT), which was decomposed into seven predefined operational factors. AMT ranged from 567 to 717 procedures per month, whereas RMTT ranged from 1,165 to 1,332, yielding a mean TER of 53%. The largest contributors to variance were rooms closed due to lack of endoscopist assignment (45%), workflow delays (21%), and patient no-shows or late cancellations (11%). In this pilot, we demonstrate that using commonly captured operational metrics, throughput benchmarking provides a practical framework to quantify efficiency and identify specific, actionable drivers of underperformance in endoscopy operations.</p>","PeriodicalId":16338,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Systems","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Systems","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-026-02427-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Rising demand for colorectal cancer screening has increased colonoscopy volume, producing backlogs and prolonged wait times. Commonly used metrics such as room utilization provide limited insight into actionable drivers of efficiency; we applied a novel throughput benchmarking framework to quantify performance and identify operational sources of inefficiency. We conducted a pilot study in a four-room outpatient endoscopy unit from July-December 2022. Using routinely recorded timestamps for procedural stages, we derived a realistic daily target throughput (RDTT). Monthly realistic target throughput (RMTT) was calculated from RDTT. Actual monthly throughput (AMT) was benchmarked against RMTT to generate a throughput efficiency ratio (TER = AMT/RMTT) and throughput variance (TV = RMTT - AMT), which was decomposed into seven predefined operational factors. AMT ranged from 567 to 717 procedures per month, whereas RMTT ranged from 1,165 to 1,332, yielding a mean TER of 53%. The largest contributors to variance were rooms closed due to lack of endoscopist assignment (45%), workflow delays (21%), and patient no-shows or late cancellations (11%). In this pilot, we demonstrate that using commonly captured operational metrics, throughput benchmarking provides a practical framework to quantify efficiency and identify specific, actionable drivers of underperformance in endoscopy operations.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Medical Systems provides a forum for the presentation and discussion of the increasingly extensive applications of new systems techniques and methods in hospital clinic and physician''s office administration; pathology radiology and pharmaceutical delivery systems; medical records storage and retrieval; and ancillary patient-support systems. The journal publishes informative articles essays and studies across the entire scale of medical systems from large hospital programs to novel small-scale medical services. Education is an integral part of this amalgamation of sciences and selected articles are published in this area. Since existing medical systems are constantly being modified to fit particular circumstances and to solve specific problems the journal includes a special section devoted to status reports on current installations.