Effects of adding R-BoT + plus verticalization-based robotic locomotor training to conventional rehabilitation in patients with subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Kyung Han Kim, Yoo Kyeong Han, Jung Eun Son, Arum Jeon, Hyo Been Lee, Miae Lee, Seong Kyu Noh, Hak Byung Kim, Eo Jin Park, Seung Ah Lee, Sung Joon Chung, Dong Hwan Kim, Seung Don Yoo
{"title":"Effects of adding R-BoT + plus verticalization-based robotic locomotor training to conventional rehabilitation in patients with subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Kyung Han Kim, Yoo Kyeong Han, Jung Eun Son, Arum Jeon, Hyo Been Lee, Miae Lee, Seong Kyu Noh, Hak Byung Kim, Eo Jin Park, Seung Ah Lee, Sung Joon Chung, Dong Hwan Kim, Seung Don Yoo","doi":"10.1186/s12984-026-02053-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early recovery of gait and trunk control during the subacute phase after stroke is crucial for long-term functional outcomes. Robotic-assisted rehabilitation enabling upright positioning, weight-bearing, and repetitive stepping-like movements has emerged as a promising adjunct to conventional therapy. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate whether adding R-BoT + plus verticalization-based robotic locomotor training to conventional inpatient rehabilitation leads to greater improvement in gait independence than conventional rehabilitation alone. The secondary aims were to assess the effects of the intervention on trunk control, cognitive function, activities of daily living (ADL), balance, and lower-extremity motor function.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted in an inpatient rehabilitation setting and enrolled patients with subacute stroke and severe gait impairment. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either R-BoT + plus verticalization robotic locomotor training combined with conventional rehabilitation or conventional rehabilitation alone. Both groups received conventional rehabilitation five times per week for 4 weeks. The experimental group also received R-BoT + plus verticalization-based robotic locomotor training with the same frequency and duration (20 sessions; 30 min per session). Outcomes were assessed at baseline (preintervention) and postintervention, with a 3-month follow-up for gait independence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients who received R-BoT + plus training demonstrated significantly greater improvement in the Functional Ambulation Category than the control group. Mixed-effects modeling showed sustained benefits favoring the experimental group at postintervention and at 3-month follow-up. Although the overall change in Trunk Control Test scores did not differ significantly between groups, an exploratory baseline-adjusted robust regression suggested that patients with lower baseline trunk control experienced significantly greater post-intervention improvement in the experimental group. Other functional outcomes, including cognition, balance, ADL, and lower-extremity motor function, improved in both groups without significant between-group differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>R-BoT + plus verticalization-based robotic locomotor training provides additional benefits for gait independence and trunk control when added to conventional rehabilitation in patients with subacute stroke, particularly among those with greater initial impairment.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study was prospectively registered at the Clinical Research Information Service (CRiS), Republic of Korea (registration number: KCT0010040).</p>","PeriodicalId":16384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13563739/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-026-02053-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Early recovery of gait and trunk control during the subacute phase after stroke is crucial for long-term functional outcomes. Robotic-assisted rehabilitation enabling upright positioning, weight-bearing, and repetitive stepping-like movements has emerged as a promising adjunct to conventional therapy. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate whether adding R-BoT + plus verticalization-based robotic locomotor training to conventional inpatient rehabilitation leads to greater improvement in gait independence than conventional rehabilitation alone. The secondary aims were to assess the effects of the intervention on trunk control, cognitive function, activities of daily living (ADL), balance, and lower-extremity motor function.

Methods: This single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted in an inpatient rehabilitation setting and enrolled patients with subacute stroke and severe gait impairment. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either R-BoT + plus verticalization robotic locomotor training combined with conventional rehabilitation or conventional rehabilitation alone. Both groups received conventional rehabilitation five times per week for 4 weeks. The experimental group also received R-BoT + plus verticalization-based robotic locomotor training with the same frequency and duration (20 sessions; 30 min per session). Outcomes were assessed at baseline (preintervention) and postintervention, with a 3-month follow-up for gait independence.

Results: Patients who received R-BoT + plus training demonstrated significantly greater improvement in the Functional Ambulation Category than the control group. Mixed-effects modeling showed sustained benefits favoring the experimental group at postintervention and at 3-month follow-up. Although the overall change in Trunk Control Test scores did not differ significantly between groups, an exploratory baseline-adjusted robust regression suggested that patients with lower baseline trunk control experienced significantly greater post-intervention improvement in the experimental group. Other functional outcomes, including cognition, balance, ADL, and lower-extremity motor function, improved in both groups without significant between-group differences.

Conclusions: R-BoT + plus verticalization-based robotic locomotor training provides additional benefits for gait independence and trunk control when added to conventional rehabilitation in patients with subacute stroke, particularly among those with greater initial impairment.

Trial registration: This study was prospectively registered at the Clinical Research Information Service (CRiS), Republic of Korea (registration number: KCT0010040).

在亚急性脑卒中患者常规康复中加入R-BoT + +垂直机器人运动训练的效果:一项随机对照试验
背景:中风后亚急性期早期恢复步态和躯干控制对长期功能预后至关重要。机器人辅助康复使直立定位,负重和重复的步式运动已经成为传统治疗的一个有希望的辅助手段。本研究的主要目的是评估在常规住院康复中加入R-BoT + +基于垂直的机器人运动训练是否比单独的常规康复更能改善步态独立性。次要目的是评估干预对躯干控制、认知功能、日常生活活动(ADL)、平衡和下肢运动功能的影响。方法:这项单中心、前瞻性、随机对照试验在住院康复环境中进行,纳入了亚急性中风和严重步态障碍的患者。参与者被随机分配接受R-BoT +垂直机器人运动训练联合常规康复或单独常规康复。两组均接受常规康复治疗,每周5次,连续4周。实验组还接受相同频率和持续时间的R-BoT +垂直机器人运动训练(20次,每次30分钟)。在基线(干预前)和干预后评估结果,并进行3个月的步态独立性随访。结果:与对照组相比,接受R-BoT + +训练的患者在功能活动方面表现出更大的改善。混合效应模型显示实验组在干预后和3个月的随访中持续获益。虽然主干控制测试得分的总体变化在两组之间没有显著差异,但探索性基线校正的稳健回归表明,实验组较低基线主干控制的患者在干预后的改善明显更大。其他功能结果,包括认知、平衡、ADL和下肢运动功能,两组均有改善,组间无显著差异。结论:当将R-BoT + +垂直机器人运动训练加入到亚急性卒中患者的常规康复中,特别是那些初始损伤较大的患者,可以为步态独立和躯干控制提供额外的益处。试验注册:本研究在韩国临床研究信息服务中心(CRiS)前瞻性注册(注册号:KCT0010040)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
3.90%
发文量
122
审稿时长
24 months
期刊介绍: Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation considers manuscripts on all aspects of research that result from cross-fertilization of the fields of neuroscience, biomedical engineering, and physical medicine & rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书