Training on PD-L1 scoring in non-small cell lung cancer with high intra- and inter-reader agreement: results of a worldwide microscopic/digital image-based training of 751 pathologists.

IF 11.9 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
British Journal of Biomedical Science Pub Date : 2026-06-08 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/bjbs.2026.16477
Gudrun Bänfer, Rolf Diezko, Rabea Oberthür, George L Kumar, Josef Rüschoff, Hans-Ulrich Schildhaus, Bharat Jasani
{"title":"Training on PD-L1 scoring in non-small cell lung cancer with high intra- and inter-reader agreement: results of a worldwide microscopic/digital image-based training of 751 pathologists.","authors":"Gudrun Bänfer, Rolf Diezko, Rabea Oberthür, George L Kumar, Josef Rüschoff, Hans-Ulrich Schildhaus, Bharat Jasani","doi":"10.3389/bjbs.2026.16477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Semi-quantitative scoring of PD-L1 expression on tumor cells (TCs) and/or infiltrating immune cells (ICs) is complex and requires expert pathologist training to reduce inter- and intra-reader variability. We conducted a 1- or 2-day training of 751 pathologists world-wide from 63 countries over a period of 2 years (2016 and 2017). Pathologists read microscopic slides or fully digitized slides stained with PD-L1 immunohistochemistry 22C3 pharmDx assay with expression levels enriched around the clinically relevant cutoffs of 1% and 50% in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The overall inter-reader agreement (OPA) for PD-L1-stained NSCLC was 95.6% for TPS ≥1% and 87.3% for TPS ≥50% cut-off. The corresponding intra-reader agreement was 95.9% for the ≥1% and 91.4% for the ≥50% cut-off. The inter-reader negative percent agreement (NPA) for TPS ≥1% was 85.6% and 91.9% for the TPS ≥50% cut-off, and the positive percent agreement (PPA) was 97.6% (TPS ≥1%) and 81.0% (TPS ≥50%). The observed high inter- and intra-reader agreements are promising given the difficulty of reproducible scoring tumor cells with heterogeneous distribution of PD-L1 staining combined with the varied professional training, expertise, and experience of the participants. The results may reflect the utility of the expert led standardized protocol used to train pathologists for scoring PD-L1 staining in NSCLC specimens. The digital image-led training approach has the additional advantage of providing a computer-assisted scoring system and allows for remote training of pathologists worldwide.</p>","PeriodicalId":9236,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Biomedical Science","volume":"83 ","pages":"16477"},"PeriodicalIF":11.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13283929/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Biomedical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/bjbs.2026.16477","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Semi-quantitative scoring of PD-L1 expression on tumor cells (TCs) and/or infiltrating immune cells (ICs) is complex and requires expert pathologist training to reduce inter- and intra-reader variability. We conducted a 1- or 2-day training of 751 pathologists world-wide from 63 countries over a period of 2 years (2016 and 2017). Pathologists read microscopic slides or fully digitized slides stained with PD-L1 immunohistochemistry 22C3 pharmDx assay with expression levels enriched around the clinically relevant cutoffs of 1% and 50% in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The overall inter-reader agreement (OPA) for PD-L1-stained NSCLC was 95.6% for TPS ≥1% and 87.3% for TPS ≥50% cut-off. The corresponding intra-reader agreement was 95.9% for the ≥1% and 91.4% for the ≥50% cut-off. The inter-reader negative percent agreement (NPA) for TPS ≥1% was 85.6% and 91.9% for the TPS ≥50% cut-off, and the positive percent agreement (PPA) was 97.6% (TPS ≥1%) and 81.0% (TPS ≥50%). The observed high inter- and intra-reader agreements are promising given the difficulty of reproducible scoring tumor cells with heterogeneous distribution of PD-L1 staining combined with the varied professional training, expertise, and experience of the participants. The results may reflect the utility of the expert led standardized protocol used to train pathologists for scoring PD-L1 staining in NSCLC specimens. The digital image-led training approach has the additional advantage of providing a computer-assisted scoring system and allows for remote training of pathologists worldwide.

对非小细胞肺癌患者PD-L1评分的培训具有较高的读者内部和读者之间的一致性:对751名病理学家进行的全球显微镜/数字图像培训的结果。
肿瘤细胞(TCs)和/或浸润性免疫细胞(ic)上PD-L1表达的半定量评分是复杂的,需要专业的病理学家培训来减少读取器间和读取器内的可变性。我们对来自63个国家的751名病理学家进行了为期2年(2016年和2017年)的1或2天的培训。在非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)中,病理学家阅读PD-L1免疫组织化学22C3 pharmDx染色的显微切片或完全数字化的切片,其表达水平在1%和50%的临床相关截止点附近富集。TPS≥1%时,pd - l1染色NSCLC的总体读者间协议(OPA)为95.6%,TPS≥50%时,OPA为87.3%。≥1%的临界值为95.9%,≥50%的临界值为91.4%。TPS≥1%时,读者间阴性百分比一致性(NPA)分别为85.6%和91.9%,TPS≥50%时,阳性百分比一致性(PPA)分别为97.6% (TPS≥1%)和81.0% (TPS≥50%)。鉴于PD-L1染色不均匀分布的肿瘤细胞难以重复评分,再加上参与者的不同专业培训、专业知识和经验,观察到的高读写器间和读取器内的一致性是有希望的。结果可能反映了专家主导的标准化方案的实用性,用于培训病理学家在NSCLC标本中进行PD-L1染色评分。以数字图像为主导的培训方法具有提供计算机辅助评分系统的额外优势,并允许全球病理学家远程培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Biomedical Science
British Journal of Biomedical Science 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
15.80%
发文量
29
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Biomedical Science is committed to publishing high quality original research that represents a clear advance in the practice of biomedical science, and reviews that summarise recent advances in the field of biomedical science. The overall aim of the Journal is to provide a platform for the dissemination of new and innovative information on the diagnosis and management of disease that is valuable to the practicing laboratory scientist.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书