Definition and framework of sexual wellbeing for population health: a modified Delphi study.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Ruth Lewis, Billie Turner, Julie Riddell, Mhairi Campbell, Kirstin R Mitchell
{"title":"Definition and framework of sexual wellbeing for population health: a modified Delphi study.","authors":"Ruth Lewis, Billie Turner, Julie Riddell, Mhairi Campbell, Kirstin R Mitchell","doi":"10.1136/bmjsrh-2025-203200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sexual well-being is rarely prioritised as a distinct goal in national or international sexual health strategies. A major barrier is the absence of a widely accepted definition of sexual well-being. This study aimed to establish consensus on a definition and framework to inform public policy in Scotland and internationally.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A two-stage, online, modified Delphi process involving Scottish and international experts from government, non-governmental organisations and academia. Panellists rated and commented on the clarity and importance (scale: 1-9) of a proposed definition and domains of sexual wellbeing. Consensus was defined as ≥70% participants rating 7-9. Qualitative comments were synthesised and revised statements were re-rated. Statements were further refined via a consensus meeting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-five panellists completed Round 1 (53% Scotland-based; 65% >10 years' professional experience) and 66 completed Round 2 (69.5% retention). Panellists reached consensus on a definition of sexual wellbeing as \"feeling respected, safe, at ease and supported, while also having a sense of self-worth and agency in relation to sex and sexuality\" (>90% consensus). Definition statements for six domains of sexual wellbeing also achieved high consensus: sexual respect, safety, agency and support (>90% consensus) and comfort with sexuality and sexual self-esteem (>80% consensus).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first consensus definition and framework of sexual wellbeing for population health. It provides a foundation for goals and indicators to support multisector efforts aimed at promoting positive sexuality alongside mitigation of negative outcomes. Further work is required to understand the framework's transferability across diverse cultural and policy environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":9219,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsrh-2025-203200","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sexual well-being is rarely prioritised as a distinct goal in national or international sexual health strategies. A major barrier is the absence of a widely accepted definition of sexual well-being. This study aimed to establish consensus on a definition and framework to inform public policy in Scotland and internationally.

Methods: A two-stage, online, modified Delphi process involving Scottish and international experts from government, non-governmental organisations and academia. Panellists rated and commented on the clarity and importance (scale: 1-9) of a proposed definition and domains of sexual wellbeing. Consensus was defined as ≥70% participants rating 7-9. Qualitative comments were synthesised and revised statements were re-rated. Statements were further refined via a consensus meeting.

Results: Ninety-five panellists completed Round 1 (53% Scotland-based; 65% >10 years' professional experience) and 66 completed Round 2 (69.5% retention). Panellists reached consensus on a definition of sexual wellbeing as "feeling respected, safe, at ease and supported, while also having a sense of self-worth and agency in relation to sex and sexuality" (>90% consensus). Definition statements for six domains of sexual wellbeing also achieved high consensus: sexual respect, safety, agency and support (>90% consensus) and comfort with sexuality and sexual self-esteem (>80% consensus).

Conclusions: This is the first consensus definition and framework of sexual wellbeing for population health. It provides a foundation for goals and indicators to support multisector efforts aimed at promoting positive sexuality alongside mitigation of negative outcomes. Further work is required to understand the framework's transferability across diverse cultural and policy environments.

人口健康中性幸福的定义和框架:一个修正的德尔菲研究。
背景:在国家或国际性健康战略中,性健康很少作为一个明确的目标被优先考虑。一个主要的障碍是缺乏一个被广泛接受的性健康定义。本研究旨在就苏格兰和国际公共政策的定义和框架达成共识。方法:一个两阶段,在线,修改德尔福过程涉及苏格兰和国际专家从政府,非政府组织和学术界。小组成员对拟议的定义和性幸福领域的清晰度和重要性进行了评分和评论(评分范围:1-9)。共识定义为≥70%的参与者评分为7-9。综合了定性评论,重新评价了订正报表。通过协商一致会议进一步完善了声明。结果:95名小组成员完成了第一轮(53%来自苏格兰,65%拥有10年以上的专业经验),66名小组成员完成了第二轮(保留率为69.5%)。小组成员对性幸福的定义达成了共识,即“感觉受到尊重、安全、放松和支持,同时在性和性方面也有自我价值感和能动性”(bbb90 %共识)。对性幸福的六个领域的定义陈述也达到了高度共识:性尊重、性安全、性代理和性支持(>90%共识)以及性舒适和性自尊(>80%共识)。结论:这是人口健康性健康定义和框架的第一个共识。它为目标和指标提供了基础,以支持旨在促进积极的性行为和减轻消极后果的多部门努力。需要进一步的工作来了解该框架在不同文化和政策环境中的可转移性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health
BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health Medicine-Reproductive Medicine
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
6.10%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health is a multiprofessional journal that promotes sexual and reproductive health and wellbeing, and best contraceptive practice, worldwide. It publishes research, debate and comment to inform policy and practice, and recognises the importance of professional-patient partnership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书