Association between arterial to end-tidal carbon dioxide gradient and prehospital hemodynamic status in patients with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Lucas Petit Navarro, Xavier Combes, Michel Galinski, Laurent Petit, Emeline Angles, Matthieu Biais, Cédric Carrie
{"title":"Association between arterial to end-tidal carbon dioxide gradient and prehospital hemodynamic status in patients with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury.","authors":"Lucas Petit Navarro, Xavier Combes, Michel Galinski, Laurent Petit, Emeline Angles, Matthieu Biais, Cédric Carrie","doi":"10.1186/s12873-026-01649-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We aimed to assess the relationship between arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO<sub>2</sub>) and end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO<sub>2</sub>) according to three prehospital hemodynamic status and to evaluate whether hemodynamic-based EtCO₂ targets could improve agreement with PaCO₂.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Over a 4-year period, 100 adult patients with moderate-to-severe TBI admitted to a level 1 trauma center under mechanical ventilation were retrospectively included. Patients were classified into three clusters based on prehospital hemodynamic status (Cluster 1: Stable without vasopressors; Cluster 2: Stabilized with low-dose vasopressors; Cluster 3: Not stabilized with low-dose vasopressors). Correlation and agreement between paired PaCO₂ and EtCO₂ values were assessed overall and across clusters. Agreement was compared between non-adjusted and cluster-adjusted EtCO₂ thresholds.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean PaCO<sub>2</sub> - EtCO<sub>2</sub> gradient increased according to the hemodynamic status (Cluster 1: 3.5 ± 5.5 mmHg, Cluster 2: 9.9 ± 7.3 mmHg, Cluster 3: 12.6 ± 9.5 mmHg). The agreement between paired PaCO<sub>2</sub> and non-adjusted EtCO<sub>2</sub> levels decreased between the three clusters (61% [95%CI: 44-77%] in Cluster 1, 42% [95%CI: 25-59%] in Cluster 2, 31% [95%CI: 16-46%] in Cluster 3). Adjusting EtCO₂ targets according to hemodynamic status did not improve agreement between pairs (53% vs. 44%, p = 0.204).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In moderate-to-severe TBI, there is a strong relationship between the PaCO₂-EtCO₂ gradient and prehospital hemodynamic status. However, our results did not support the relevance of a prehospital ventilation strategy guided by cluster-adjusted EtCO₂ targets.</p>","PeriodicalId":9002,"journal":{"name":"BMC Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13548549/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-026-01649-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: We aimed to assess the relationship between arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) and end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2) according to three prehospital hemodynamic status and to evaluate whether hemodynamic-based EtCO₂ targets could improve agreement with PaCO₂.

Methods: Over a 4-year period, 100 adult patients with moderate-to-severe TBI admitted to a level 1 trauma center under mechanical ventilation were retrospectively included. Patients were classified into three clusters based on prehospital hemodynamic status (Cluster 1: Stable without vasopressors; Cluster 2: Stabilized with low-dose vasopressors; Cluster 3: Not stabilized with low-dose vasopressors). Correlation and agreement between paired PaCO₂ and EtCO₂ values were assessed overall and across clusters. Agreement was compared between non-adjusted and cluster-adjusted EtCO₂ thresholds.

Results: The mean PaCO2 - EtCO2 gradient increased according to the hemodynamic status (Cluster 1: 3.5 ± 5.5 mmHg, Cluster 2: 9.9 ± 7.3 mmHg, Cluster 3: 12.6 ± 9.5 mmHg). The agreement between paired PaCO2 and non-adjusted EtCO2 levels decreased between the three clusters (61% [95%CI: 44-77%] in Cluster 1, 42% [95%CI: 25-59%] in Cluster 2, 31% [95%CI: 16-46%] in Cluster 3). Adjusting EtCO₂ targets according to hemodynamic status did not improve agreement between pairs (53% vs. 44%, p = 0.204).

Conclusion: In moderate-to-severe TBI, there is a strong relationship between the PaCO₂-EtCO₂ gradient and prehospital hemodynamic status. However, our results did not support the relevance of a prehospital ventilation strategy guided by cluster-adjusted EtCO₂ targets.

中重度颅脑外伤患者动脉至潮末二氧化碳梯度与院前血流动力学状态的关系
前言:我们旨在根据院前三个血流动力学状态评估动脉二氧化碳分压(PaCO2)与潮末二氧化碳(EtCO2)之间的关系,并评估基于血流动力学的EtCO₂指标是否可以改善PaCO₂的一致性。方法:回顾性分析1级创伤中心4年期间收治的100例中重度脑外伤患者。根据院前血流动力学状态将患者分为三组(第1组:不使用血管加压剂稳定;第2组:使用低剂量血管加压剂稳定;第3组:使用低剂量血管加压剂不稳定)。对配对PaCO₂和EtCO₂值之间的相关性和一致性进行了总体和跨集群的评估。比较了未调整和集群调整的EtCO₂阈值之间的一致性。结果:PaCO2 - EtCO2梯度随血流动力学状态的不同而升高(第1组:3.5±5.5 mmHg,第2组:9.9±7.3 mmHg,第3组:12.6±9.5 mmHg)。配对PaCO2和未调整EtCO2水平之间的一致性在三个集群之间下降(集群1为61% [95%CI: 44-77%],集群2为42% [95%CI: 25-59%],集群3为31% [95%CI: 16-46%])。根据血流动力学状态调整EtCO₂目标并没有提高配对间的一致性(53% vs. 44%, p = 0.204)。结论:中重度脑外伤患者PaCO₂-EtCO₂梯度与院前血流动力学状态有密切关系。然而,我们的研究结果不支持院前通气策略的相关性,以集群调整的EtCO₂目标为指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Emergency Medicine
BMC Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
8.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Emergency Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all urgent and emergency aspects of medicine, in both practice and basic research. In addition, the journal covers aspects of disaster medicine and medicine in special locations, such as conflict areas and military medicine, together with articles concerning healthcare services in the emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书