Association of age and primary treatment with risk of non-lymphoma-related death and long-term survival outcomes in adult patients with early-stage follicular lymphoma: a population-based analysis

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Annals of Hematology Pub Date : 2026-06-24 Epub Date: 2026-08-14 DOI:10.1007/s00277-026-07144-4
Chang Xu, Yunpeng Wu, Xin Liu, Qiu-Zi Zhong, Yong Yang, Tao Wu, Si-Ye Chen, Bo Chen, Yong-Wen Song, Hui Fang, Jing Jin, Yue-Ping Liu, Hao Jing, Yuan Tang, Ning Li, Ning-Ning Lu, Wen-Wen Zhang, Shu-Lian Wang, Jingru Zhu, Shu-Nan Qi, Ye-Xiong Li
{"title":"Association of age and primary treatment with risk of non-lymphoma-related death and long-term survival outcomes in adult patients with early-stage follicular lymphoma: a population-based analysis","authors":"Chang Xu,&nbsp;Yunpeng Wu,&nbsp;Xin Liu,&nbsp;Qiu-Zi Zhong,&nbsp;Yong Yang,&nbsp;Tao Wu,&nbsp;Si-Ye Chen,&nbsp;Bo Chen,&nbsp;Yong-Wen Song,&nbsp;Hui Fang,&nbsp;Jing Jin,&nbsp;Yue-Ping Liu,&nbsp;Hao Jing,&nbsp;Yuan Tang,&nbsp;Ning Li,&nbsp;Ning-Ning Lu,&nbsp;Wen-Wen Zhang,&nbsp;Shu-Lian Wang,&nbsp;Jingru Zhu,&nbsp;Shu-Nan Qi,&nbsp;Ye-Xiong Li","doi":"10.1007/s00277-026-07144-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In adult patients with early-stage follicular lymphoma (FL), age-related differences in the risk of non-lymphoma-related death (LRD) during the follow-up period after treatment are unclear. We aimed to investigate the interactive effects of age and primary treatment on the risk of non-LRD and survival. We retrospectively analyzed the data of 6030 adult patients with early-stage FL from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2000–2020). Primary therapy involved observation (<i>n</i> = 2509), chemotherapy (CT) alone (<i>n</i> = 1844), radiotherapy alone (RT, <i>n</i> = 1191) or RT and CT (RT + CT, <i>n</i> = 486). The groups were balanced by inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Comparisons of the cumulative incidence of non-LRD were performed using competing-risk analysis and transformed Cox regression analysis. The median patient age was 64 years (RT, 62 years; RT + CT, 60 years; CT, 63 years; observation, 66 years). Over a median follow-up period of 132 months, 830 patients (13.8%) died of FL, while non-LRD accounted for 1279 patients (21.2%). Age significantly influenced the non-LRD risk, especially in patients aged &gt; 60 years. After IPTW adjustment, RT alone, RT + CT or CT alone was not associated with an increased risk of the cumulative incidences of non-LRD or its specific causes in comparison with observation. Age-dependent analyses showed that the adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for RT alone, RT + CT or CT versus observation remained close to 1.0 across the age spectrum, indicating no significant difference in non-LRD risk between treatment groups. RT alone and RT + CT conferred sustained overall survival (OS), disease specific survival (DSS) and relative survival (RS) advantages over CT or observation, with RS consistently exceeding 90% over the extended follow-up period. The survival benefit of RT versus non-RT persisted across age groups, with the adjusted HRs for OS and RS remaining below 1.0 for most ages. Older age, not primary treatment, was associated with an increased risk of non-LRD. The results indicated the safety and long-term survival benefit of RT in adult patients with early-stage FL.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8068,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Hematology","volume":"105 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00277-026-07144-4.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00277-026-07144-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In adult patients with early-stage follicular lymphoma (FL), age-related differences in the risk of non-lymphoma-related death (LRD) during the follow-up period after treatment are unclear. We aimed to investigate the interactive effects of age and primary treatment on the risk of non-LRD and survival. We retrospectively analyzed the data of 6030 adult patients with early-stage FL from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2000–2020). Primary therapy involved observation (n = 2509), chemotherapy (CT) alone (n = 1844), radiotherapy alone (RT, n = 1191) or RT and CT (RT + CT, n = 486). The groups were balanced by inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Comparisons of the cumulative incidence of non-LRD were performed using competing-risk analysis and transformed Cox regression analysis. The median patient age was 64 years (RT, 62 years; RT + CT, 60 years; CT, 63 years; observation, 66 years). Over a median follow-up period of 132 months, 830 patients (13.8%) died of FL, while non-LRD accounted for 1279 patients (21.2%). Age significantly influenced the non-LRD risk, especially in patients aged > 60 years. After IPTW adjustment, RT alone, RT + CT or CT alone was not associated with an increased risk of the cumulative incidences of non-LRD or its specific causes in comparison with observation. Age-dependent analyses showed that the adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for RT alone, RT + CT or CT versus observation remained close to 1.0 across the age spectrum, indicating no significant difference in non-LRD risk between treatment groups. RT alone and RT + CT conferred sustained overall survival (OS), disease specific survival (DSS) and relative survival (RS) advantages over CT or observation, with RS consistently exceeding 90% over the extended follow-up period. The survival benefit of RT versus non-RT persisted across age groups, with the adjusted HRs for OS and RS remaining below 1.0 for most ages. Older age, not primary treatment, was associated with an increased risk of non-LRD. The results indicated the safety and long-term survival benefit of RT in adult patients with early-stage FL.

早期滤泡性淋巴瘤成年患者年龄和初始治疗与非淋巴瘤相关死亡风险和长期生存结局的关联:一项基于人群的分析
在成年早期滤泡性淋巴瘤(FL)患者中,治疗后随访期间非淋巴瘤相关性死亡(LRD)风险的年龄相关差异尚不清楚。我们的目的是研究年龄和初始治疗对非lrd风险和生存的相互作用。我们回顾性分析了来自监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库(2000-2020)的6030名成年早期FL患者的数据。主要治疗包括观察(n = 2509)、单独化疗(CT) (n = 1844)、单独放疗(RT, n = 1191)或RT + CT (RT + CT, n = 486)。采用治疗加权逆概率法(IPTW)平衡各组。采用竞争风险分析和转化Cox回归分析比较非lrd的累积发病率。患者年龄中位数为64岁(RT 62岁;RT + CT 60岁;CT 63岁;观察66岁)。在132个月的中位随访期间,830例(13.8%)患者死于FL,而非lrd患者占1279例(21.2%)。年龄对非lrd风险有显著影响,尤其是在60岁的患者中。经IPTW调整后,与观察组相比,单独RT、RT + CT或单独CT与非lrd累积发生率或其特定原因的风险增加无关。年龄相关分析显示,在整个年龄范围内,单独RT、RT + CT或CT与观察的校正风险比(hr)仍接近1.0,表明治疗组之间的非lrd风险无显著差异。与CT或观察相比,单独RT和RT + CT具有持续总生存期(OS)、疾病特异性生存期(DSS)和相对生存期(RS)的优势,在延长的随访期间,RS一直超过90%。放疗相对于非放疗的生存获益在各个年龄组中持续存在,大多数年龄组的OS和RS调整后的hr保持在1.0以下。年龄较大,而不是初次治疗,与非lrd风险增加相关。结果表明,在成年早期FL患者中,RT治疗的安全性和长期生存获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Hematology
Annals of Hematology 医学-血液学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
304
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Annals of Hematology covers the whole spectrum of clinical and experimental hematology, hemostaseology, blood transfusion, and related aspects of medical oncology, including diagnosis and treatment of leukemias, lymphatic neoplasias and solid tumors, and transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells. Coverage includes general aspects of oncology, molecular biology and immunology as pertinent to problems of human blood disease. The journal is associated with the German Society for Hematology and Medical Oncology, and the Austrian Society for Hematology and Oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书