The Danish Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Trial: A Statistical Analysis Plan.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Simon Mølstrøm, Jacob E Møller, Henrik Schmidt, Anders M Grejs, Steffen Christensen, Jesper Kjærgaard, Christian Hassager, Martin A S Meyer, Lars P K Andersen, Bodil S Rasmussen, Jo B Andreasen, Sören Möller
{"title":"The Danish Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Trial: A Statistical Analysis Plan.","authors":"Simon Mølstrøm, Jacob E Møller, Henrik Schmidt, Anders M Grejs, Steffen Christensen, Jesper Kjærgaard, Christian Hassager, Martin A S Meyer, Lars P K Andersen, Bodil S Rasmussen, Jo B Andreasen, Sören Möller","doi":"10.1111/aas.70288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Post-cardiac arrest care for patients resuscitated from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) includes multiple pharmacological and physiological interventions, yet optimal strategies to reduce post-cardiac arrest syndrome-related morbidity and mortality remain uncertain. The DANOHCA (Danish Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest) trial evaluates four such interventions-high-dose dexamethasone, prophylactic olanzapine, elevated backrest position, and early wakeup-in a factorial trial framework. This manuscript presents the complete statistical analysis plan for analyses common to all four DANOHCA interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>DANOHCA is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized, 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 factorial clinical trial enrolling comatose adult OHCA patients with a presumed cardiac etiology who achieve sustained return of spontaneous circulation, with randomization within 180 min of return of spontaneous circulation. Participants are co-randomized to Dexamethasone versus placebo, olanzapine versus placebo, backrest elevation at 35° versus 5°, and early (≤ 6 h) versus late (28-36 h) wakeup, with pharmacological interventions blinded and physiological interventions open-label. This statistical analysis plan specifies the primary and secondary outcomes, covariate adjustment, handling of missing data, assessments of interactions between interventions, and assumption checks, with all primary analyses conducted according to the intention-to-treat principle. The analysis plan is finalized prior to completion of randomization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary outcomes are 90-day all-cause mortality for the dexamethasone and backrest interventions, and days alive outside hospital within 30 days for the olanzapine and early wakeup interventions, with common secondary and tertiary endpoints including mortality at later time points, neurological function, health-related quality of life, organ function, and safety outcomes. Mixed-effects regression models, Cox regression, stratified nonparametric tests, and prespecified sensitivity analyses will be applied to minimize bias and quantify intervention effects, including their associated uncertainties.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This predefined statistical analysis plan provides a detailed, transparent framework for the primary analyses and reporting of the DANOHCA trial.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS): 2024-515997-28-00.</p>","PeriodicalId":6909,"journal":{"name":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","volume":"70 7","pages":"e70288"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13291755/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.70288","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Post-cardiac arrest care for patients resuscitated from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) includes multiple pharmacological and physiological interventions, yet optimal strategies to reduce post-cardiac arrest syndrome-related morbidity and mortality remain uncertain. The DANOHCA (Danish Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest) trial evaluates four such interventions-high-dose dexamethasone, prophylactic olanzapine, elevated backrest position, and early wakeup-in a factorial trial framework. This manuscript presents the complete statistical analysis plan for analyses common to all four DANOHCA interventions.

Methods: DANOHCA is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized, 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 factorial clinical trial enrolling comatose adult OHCA patients with a presumed cardiac etiology who achieve sustained return of spontaneous circulation, with randomization within 180 min of return of spontaneous circulation. Participants are co-randomized to Dexamethasone versus placebo, olanzapine versus placebo, backrest elevation at 35° versus 5°, and early (≤ 6 h) versus late (28-36 h) wakeup, with pharmacological interventions blinded and physiological interventions open-label. This statistical analysis plan specifies the primary and secondary outcomes, covariate adjustment, handling of missing data, assessments of interactions between interventions, and assumption checks, with all primary analyses conducted according to the intention-to-treat principle. The analysis plan is finalized prior to completion of randomization.

Results: The primary outcomes are 90-day all-cause mortality for the dexamethasone and backrest interventions, and days alive outside hospital within 30 days for the olanzapine and early wakeup interventions, with common secondary and tertiary endpoints including mortality at later time points, neurological function, health-related quality of life, organ function, and safety outcomes. Mixed-effects regression models, Cox regression, stratified nonparametric tests, and prespecified sensitivity analyses will be applied to minimize bias and quantify intervention effects, including their associated uncertainties.

Conclusion: This predefined statistical analysis plan provides a detailed, transparent framework for the primary analyses and reporting of the DANOHCA trial.

Trial registration: Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS): 2024-515997-28-00.

丹麦院外心脏骤停试验:一个统计分析计划。
背景:院外心脏骤停(OHCA)复苏患者的心脏骤停后护理包括多种药理学和生理学干预,但降低心脏骤停后综合征相关发病率和死亡率的最佳策略仍不确定。DANOHCA(丹麦院外心脏骤停)试验在一个析因试验框架中评估了四种干预措施——大剂量地塞米松、预防性奥氮平、抬高靠背位置和早起。这份手稿提出了完整的统计分析计划,分析共同的所有四个DANOHCA干预。方法:DANOHCA是一项研究者发起的、多中心、随机、2 × 2 × 2因子的临床试验,纳入了推定为心脏病因的成年OHCA昏迷患者,这些患者实现了持续的自然循环恢复,随机分组在自然循环恢复后180分钟内。受试者随机分为地塞米松vs安慰剂组、奥氮平vs安慰剂组、靠背抬高35°vs 5°组、早起(≤6小时)vs晚起床(28-36小时)组,药物干预为盲法,生理干预为开放标签。该统计分析计划规定了主要和次要结果、协变量调整、缺失数据的处理、干预之间相互作用的评估和假设检验,所有的主要分析都根据意向治疗原则进行。分析计划在随机化完成前确定。结果:地塞米松和靠垫干预组的主要终点是90天全因死亡率,奥氮平和早起干预组的主要终点是30天内院外存活天数,常见的第二和第三终点包括后期时间点的死亡率、神经功能、健康相关生活质量、器官功能和安全性结局。混合效应回归模型、Cox回归、分层非参数检验和预先指定的敏感性分析将被应用于最小化偏倚和量化干预效应,包括其相关的不确定性。结论:这个预定义的统计分析计划为DANOHCA试验的初步分析和报告提供了一个详细、透明的框架。试验注册:临床试验信息系统(CTIS): 2024-515997-28-00。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
157
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica publishes papers on original work in the fields of anaesthesiology, intensive care, pain, emergency medicine, and subjects related to their basic sciences, on condition that they are contributed exclusively to this Journal. Case reports and short communications may be considered for publication if of particular interest; also letters to the Editor, especially if related to already published material. The editorial board is free to discuss the publication of reviews on current topics, the choice of which, however, is the prerogative of the board. Every effort will be made by the Editors and selected experts to expedite a critical review of manuscripts in order to ensure rapid publication of papers of a high scientific standard.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书