{"title":"Psychometric Properties and Transfer Measures of Working Memory in Older Adults: A Scoping Review","authors":"Juan Muñoz-Olano, Steve Pedraza-Vargas","doi":"10.1007/s12126-026-09657-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The assessment of working memory (WM) in healthy older adults has become a central topic in cognitive research due to the sustained growth of this population and the widespread use of WM tasks as indicators of cognitive functioning and training outcomes. However, the existing literature presents inconsistent evidence. The aim of this scoping review was to map the tasks used to assess working memory in healthy older adults, describe the available evidence on their psychometric properties, and examine the conditions under which near and far transfer measures have been evaluated. A scoping review was conducted following PRISMA-ScR guidelines and COSMIN criteria adapted for experimental tasks, with systematic searches in Scopus, ScienceDirect, Academic Search Complete, Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection, and Google Scholar. Empirical studies and reviews resulting in a total of 34 eligible studies. The results showed that complex span tasks exhibit the most consistent psychometric profile, whereas widely used paradigms such as the n-back and alternative updating tasks present limited evidence of reliability, measurement error, and responsiveness. Near transfer was strongly dependent on structural similarity between tasks, while far transfer was generally absent or weak. Overall, the findings reveal marked methodological and psychometric heterogeneity in the assessment of working memory in older adults, highlighting the need to improve psychometric rigor and the interpretation of gains observed in training and assessment contexts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51665,"journal":{"name":"Ageing International","volume":"51 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12126-026-09657-9.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ageing International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12126-026-09657-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The assessment of working memory (WM) in healthy older adults has become a central topic in cognitive research due to the sustained growth of this population and the widespread use of WM tasks as indicators of cognitive functioning and training outcomes. However, the existing literature presents inconsistent evidence. The aim of this scoping review was to map the tasks used to assess working memory in healthy older adults, describe the available evidence on their psychometric properties, and examine the conditions under which near and far transfer measures have been evaluated. A scoping review was conducted following PRISMA-ScR guidelines and COSMIN criteria adapted for experimental tasks, with systematic searches in Scopus, ScienceDirect, Academic Search Complete, Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection, and Google Scholar. Empirical studies and reviews resulting in a total of 34 eligible studies. The results showed that complex span tasks exhibit the most consistent psychometric profile, whereas widely used paradigms such as the n-back and alternative updating tasks present limited evidence of reliability, measurement error, and responsiveness. Near transfer was strongly dependent on structural similarity between tasks, while far transfer was generally absent or weak. Overall, the findings reveal marked methodological and psychometric heterogeneity in the assessment of working memory in older adults, highlighting the need to improve psychometric rigor and the interpretation of gains observed in training and assessment contexts.
期刊介绍:
As a quarterly peer-reviewed journal that has existed for over three decades, Ageing International serves all professionals who deal with complex ageing issues. The journal is dedicated to improving the life of ageing populations worldwide through providing an intellectual forum for communicating common concerns, exchanging analyses and discoveries in scientific research, crystallizing significant issues, and offering recommendations in ageing-related service delivery and policy making. Besides encouraging the submission of high-quality research and review papers, Ageing International seeks to bring together researchers, policy analysts, and service program administrators who are committed to reducing the ''implementation gap'' between good science and effective service, between evidence-based protocol and culturally suitable programs, and between unique innovative solutions and generalizable policies. For significant issues that are common across countries, Ageing International will organize special forums for scholars and investigators from different disciplines to present their regional perspectives as well as to provide more comprehensive analysis. The editors strongly believe that such discourse has the potential to foster a wide range of coordinated efforts that will lead to improvements in the quality of life of older persons worldwide. Abstracted and Indexed in:
ABI/INFORM, Academic OneFile, Academic Search, CSA/Proquest, Current Abstracts, EBSCO, Ergonomics Abstracts, Expanded Academic, Gale, Google Scholar, Health Reference Center Academic, OCLC, PsychINFO, PsyARTICLES, SCOPUS, Social Science Abstracts, and Summon by Serial Solutions.