Exploring Personal Narrative Coherence in 10-Year-Old Children: A Global Study Using the Global TALES Protocol.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Marleen F Westerveld,Stephanie Malone,Carol Westby,Cibelle Amato,Josephine Ohenewa Bampoe,Angel Chan,Kai-Mei Chen,Maria Chrysostomou,Mary Claessen,Jóhanna Einarsdóttir,Sara Ferman,Fernanda Dreux Fernandes,Pamela Filiatrault-Veilleux,Mateja Gabaj,Eleftheria Geronikou,Vani Gupta,Kristine Jensen de López,Khaloob Kawar,Jelena Kuvač Kraljević,HaeJi Lee,Jisun Lee,Rena Lyons,İlknur Maviş,Nadia Nørgaard,Mary-Pat O'Malley Keighran,Laura Quintanilla,Semra Selvi Balo,Elena Theodorou,Tze Peng Wong,Anita Mei-Yin Wong,Esra Yasar Gunduz,Wanlin Zhu,Nickola Nelson
{"title":"Exploring Personal Narrative Coherence in 10-Year-Old Children: A Global Study Using the Global TALES Protocol.","authors":"Marleen F Westerveld,Stephanie Malone,Carol Westby,Cibelle Amato,Josephine Ohenewa Bampoe,Angel Chan,Kai-Mei Chen,Maria Chrysostomou,Mary Claessen,Jóhanna Einarsdóttir,Sara Ferman,Fernanda Dreux Fernandes,Pamela Filiatrault-Veilleux,Mateja Gabaj,Eleftheria Geronikou,Vani Gupta,Kristine Jensen de López,Khaloob Kawar,Jelena Kuvač Kraljević,HaeJi Lee,Jisun Lee,Rena Lyons,İlknur Maviş,Nadia Nørgaard,Mary-Pat O'Malley Keighran,Laura Quintanilla,Semra Selvi Balo,Elena Theodorou,Tze Peng Wong,Anita Mei-Yin Wong,Esra Yasar Gunduz,Wanlin Zhu,Nickola Nelson","doi":"10.1044/2026_lshss-25-00143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\r\nThe overall aim of this exploratory study was to evaluate personal narrative coherence in groups of children representing a range of cultural and/or linguistic backgrounds. Based on previous research, we expected to find effects based on culture/language participant group and the emotional valence of the prompt (positive, negative, neutral). We also anticipated potential interactions between culture/language participant group and prompt type.\r\n\r\nMETHOD\r\nFour hundred seventeen 10-year-old children from 21 culture/language participant groups took part in this cross-sectional study. The children were from 19 countries or regions, speaking 18 different languages or dialects. All children were seen individually, either face-to-face or online, and asked to produce personal narratives in response to the Global Talking About Lived Experiences in Stories (TALES) protocol. Three of their narratives, each representing a different emotional valence-happy, angry, and a problem situation-were included in the current study. All narratives were coded for coherence using the multidimensional Narrative Coherence Coding Scheme (NaCCS), which yields a total coherence score and three coherence dimension subscores: context, chronology, and theme. Linear mixed models were used to identify differences in narrative coherence between culture/language participant groups and narrative prompt types.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nWe found significant main effects for both participant group and narrative prompt type on total coherence scores, as well as a significant interaction effect. Overall, the problem prompt elicited more coherent narratives than the angry prompt. Performance varied notably across culture/language participant groups, with no consistent pattern of strength linked to prompt type. Additionally, some culture/language participant groups scored significantly lower on total coherence than others. Significant participant group effects were also observed across all three coherence dimension subscores, with the theme dimension showing the greatest number of between-groups differences.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nIn an increasingly multicultural and plurilingual world, the need for ecologically valid tools to assess children's spoken language skills is more critical than ever. Findings from this exploratory study offer further support for the use of the Global TALES protocol for eliciting personal narratives in children from diverse cultural and/or linguistic backgrounds. Furthermore, results indicated that the NaCCS is a viable method for describing differences and similarities in personal narrative coherence among these diverse groups of children. Our next steps involve refining the coding framework and expanding our participant pool to include larger, more age- and ability-representative samples-with the ultimate aim of integrating personal narrative assessment and analysis into routine clinical practice worldwide.\r\n\r\nSUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL\r\nhttps://doi.org/10.23641/asha.32653314.","PeriodicalId":54326,"journal":{"name":"Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools","volume":"824 1","pages":"1-25"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2026_lshss-25-00143","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PURPOSE The overall aim of this exploratory study was to evaluate personal narrative coherence in groups of children representing a range of cultural and/or linguistic backgrounds. Based on previous research, we expected to find effects based on culture/language participant group and the emotional valence of the prompt (positive, negative, neutral). We also anticipated potential interactions between culture/language participant group and prompt type. METHOD Four hundred seventeen 10-year-old children from 21 culture/language participant groups took part in this cross-sectional study. The children were from 19 countries or regions, speaking 18 different languages or dialects. All children were seen individually, either face-to-face or online, and asked to produce personal narratives in response to the Global Talking About Lived Experiences in Stories (TALES) protocol. Three of their narratives, each representing a different emotional valence-happy, angry, and a problem situation-were included in the current study. All narratives were coded for coherence using the multidimensional Narrative Coherence Coding Scheme (NaCCS), which yields a total coherence score and three coherence dimension subscores: context, chronology, and theme. Linear mixed models were used to identify differences in narrative coherence between culture/language participant groups and narrative prompt types. RESULTS We found significant main effects for both participant group and narrative prompt type on total coherence scores, as well as a significant interaction effect. Overall, the problem prompt elicited more coherent narratives than the angry prompt. Performance varied notably across culture/language participant groups, with no consistent pattern of strength linked to prompt type. Additionally, some culture/language participant groups scored significantly lower on total coherence than others. Significant participant group effects were also observed across all three coherence dimension subscores, with the theme dimension showing the greatest number of between-groups differences. CONCLUSIONS In an increasingly multicultural and plurilingual world, the need for ecologically valid tools to assess children's spoken language skills is more critical than ever. Findings from this exploratory study offer further support for the use of the Global TALES protocol for eliciting personal narratives in children from diverse cultural and/or linguistic backgrounds. Furthermore, results indicated that the NaCCS is a viable method for describing differences and similarities in personal narrative coherence among these diverse groups of children. Our next steps involve refining the coding framework and expanding our participant pool to include larger, more age- and ability-representative samples-with the ultimate aim of integrating personal narrative assessment and analysis into routine clinical practice worldwide. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.32653314.
探索10岁儿童的个人叙事连贯性:一项使用全球故事协议的全球研究。
目的本探索性研究的总体目的是评估代表不同文化和/或语言背景的儿童群体的个人叙事连贯性。基于先前的研究,我们期望发现基于文化/语言参与者群体和提示的情绪效价(积极,消极,中性)的影响。我们还预测了文化/语言参与者群体和提示类型之间的潜在互动。方法来自21个文化/语言参与者群体的417名10岁儿童参加了本横断面研究。这些孩子来自19个国家或地区,讲18种不同的语言或方言。所有的孩子都被单独观察,无论是面对面的还是在线的,并被要求根据全球谈论故事中的生活经历(TALES)协议制作个人叙述。他们的三种叙述,每一种都代表一种不同的情感价值——快乐、愤怒和一个问题——被纳入了当前的研究。使用多维叙事连贯性编码方案(NaCCS)对所有叙事进行连贯性编码,得出总体连贯性得分和三个连贯性维度子得分:语境、时间顺序和主题。线性混合模型用于识别不同文化/语言参与者群体和不同叙事提示类型在叙事连贯性方面的差异。结果被试组和叙事提示类型对总连贯得分均有显著的主效应,并有显著的交互效应。总的来说,问题提示比愤怒提示引出了更连贯的叙述。不同文化/语言的参与者群体的表现差异很大,提示类型没有一致的强度模式。此外,一些文化/语言参与者群体在总体连贯性方面的得分明显低于其他群体。在所有三个连贯维度的子得分中也观察到显著的参与者群体效应,其中主题维度显示出最大的组间差异。结论在一个日益多元文化和多语言的世界中,对评估儿童口语技能的生态有效工具的需求比以往任何时候都更加迫切。这项探索性研究的结果进一步支持使用全球故事协议来引出来自不同文化和/或语言背景的儿童的个人叙述。此外,研究结果表明,NaCCS是描述这些不同群体儿童个人叙事连贯性差异和相似之处的可行方法。我们接下来的步骤包括完善编码框架,扩大我们的参与者群体,以包括更大、更能代表年龄和能力的样本,最终目标是将个人叙事评估和分析整合到全球的常规临床实践中。补充MATERIALhttps: / / doi.org/10.23641/asha.32653314。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools
Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
165
期刊介绍: Mission: LSHSS publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles pertaining to the practice of audiology and speech-language pathology in the schools, focusing on children and adolescents. The journal is an international outlet for clinical research and is designed to promote development and analysis of approaches concerning the delivery of services to the school-aged population. LSHSS seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work. Scope: The broad field of audiology and speech-language pathology as practiced in schools, including aural rehabilitation; augmentative and alternative communication; childhood apraxia of speech; classroom acoustics; cognitive impairment; craniofacial disorders; fluency disorders; hearing-assistive technology; language disorders; literacy disorders including reading, writing, and spelling; motor speech disorders; speech sound disorders; swallowing, dysphagia, and feeding disorders; voice disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书