Correctional-staff wellness in a statewide jail system: health appraisals, occupational strain and priorities for organizational support.

Hayden P Smith, Frank Ferdik, Rebecca L Fix
{"title":"Correctional-staff wellness in a statewide jail system: health appraisals, occupational strain and priorities for organizational support.","authors":"Hayden P Smith, Frank Ferdik, Rebecca L Fix","doi":"10.1108/IJOPH-01-2026-0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Although substantial research has examined correctional officer health, fewer studies have focused on jail staff, and even fewer have done so within a unified, statewide jail system. This study aims to address this gap by examining staff perceptions of health and wellness across Tennessee's county jails, where centralized oversight enables system level insight.</p><p><strong>Design/methodology/approach: </strong>Open-ended questionnaire data from 412 correctional personnel were analyzed following survey distribution to staff across all 120 Tennessee county jails. While jails are typically decentralized, Tennessee's system operates under unified oversight, allowing consistent access and comparable analysis. Responses were analyzed thematically to identify health statuses, health threats and health resources.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Staff identified chronic stress, burnout, trauma exposure and environmental hazards as central threats. Understaffing, mandatory overtime and unpredictable demands were consistently linked to limited rest and declining health. Participants also highlighted organizational needs, including mental health resources, improved air quality, and healthier nutrition options.</p><p><strong>Research limitations/implications: </strong>This study underscores the importance of system-level, jail-specific research on correctional staff health and well-being. By demonstrating how organizational structures, environmental conditions and staffing practices shape cumulative health risks across an entire statewide jail system, the findings highlight limitations of single-site and prison-focused studies that dominate the literature. Future research should prioritize multisite and longitudinal designs that examine how changes in staffing models, shift structures and physical environments influence health trajectories over time. In addition, integrating staff-centred qualitative methods with objective health indicators would strengthen causal inference and advance theory on occupational strain, recovery and cumulative load in correctional settings.</p><p><strong>Practical implications: </strong>The findings provide clear guidance for correctional administrators and policymakers seeking to improve staff well-being. Participants consistently identified practical priorities, including confidential mental health services, trauma-responsive supports, improved air quality and nutrition, access to fitness resources, and staffing reforms that protect recovery time. Importantly, the study illustrates that wellness initiatives are unlikely to succeed without addressing structural constraints such as chronic understaffing and mandatory overtime. Agencies should therefore shift from isolated, program-based interventions toward integrated, system-level strategies that align organizational design with health promotion. Centralized oversight bodies can play a key role in standardizing and supporting these efforts across facilities.</p><p><strong>Social implications: </strong>Correctional staff health has implications that extend beyond the workforce to incarcerated populations, families and communities. Poor staff well-being contributes to burnout, turnover and organizational instability, which can undermine safety, continuity of care and rehabilitative programming within jails. By identifying staff-defined priorities for healthier working conditions, this study supports broader public health goals related to institutional safety, ethical care and workforce sustainability. Improving correctional staff well-being may also reduce stigma surrounding mental health in custodial environments and promote healthier interactions between staff and incarcerated individuals, ultimately contributing to more humane, stable and socially responsive correctional systems.</p><p><strong>Originality/value: </strong>This study advances correctional health research by focusing on jail staff within a unified statewide framework. System wide data enhance generalizability and policy relevance while centering staff perspectives.</p>","PeriodicalId":519936,"journal":{"name":"International journal of prison health","volume":" ","pages":"464-478"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of prison health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPH-01-2026-0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Although substantial research has examined correctional officer health, fewer studies have focused on jail staff, and even fewer have done so within a unified, statewide jail system. This study aims to address this gap by examining staff perceptions of health and wellness across Tennessee's county jails, where centralized oversight enables system level insight.

Design/methodology/approach: Open-ended questionnaire data from 412 correctional personnel were analyzed following survey distribution to staff across all 120 Tennessee county jails. While jails are typically decentralized, Tennessee's system operates under unified oversight, allowing consistent access and comparable analysis. Responses were analyzed thematically to identify health statuses, health threats and health resources.

Findings: Staff identified chronic stress, burnout, trauma exposure and environmental hazards as central threats. Understaffing, mandatory overtime and unpredictable demands were consistently linked to limited rest and declining health. Participants also highlighted organizational needs, including mental health resources, improved air quality, and healthier nutrition options.

Research limitations/implications: This study underscores the importance of system-level, jail-specific research on correctional staff health and well-being. By demonstrating how organizational structures, environmental conditions and staffing practices shape cumulative health risks across an entire statewide jail system, the findings highlight limitations of single-site and prison-focused studies that dominate the literature. Future research should prioritize multisite and longitudinal designs that examine how changes in staffing models, shift structures and physical environments influence health trajectories over time. In addition, integrating staff-centred qualitative methods with objective health indicators would strengthen causal inference and advance theory on occupational strain, recovery and cumulative load in correctional settings.

Practical implications: The findings provide clear guidance for correctional administrators and policymakers seeking to improve staff well-being. Participants consistently identified practical priorities, including confidential mental health services, trauma-responsive supports, improved air quality and nutrition, access to fitness resources, and staffing reforms that protect recovery time. Importantly, the study illustrates that wellness initiatives are unlikely to succeed without addressing structural constraints such as chronic understaffing and mandatory overtime. Agencies should therefore shift from isolated, program-based interventions toward integrated, system-level strategies that align organizational design with health promotion. Centralized oversight bodies can play a key role in standardizing and supporting these efforts across facilities.

Social implications: Correctional staff health has implications that extend beyond the workforce to incarcerated populations, families and communities. Poor staff well-being contributes to burnout, turnover and organizational instability, which can undermine safety, continuity of care and rehabilitative programming within jails. By identifying staff-defined priorities for healthier working conditions, this study supports broader public health goals related to institutional safety, ethical care and workforce sustainability. Improving correctional staff well-being may also reduce stigma surrounding mental health in custodial environments and promote healthier interactions between staff and incarcerated individuals, ultimately contributing to more humane, stable and socially responsive correctional systems.

Originality/value: This study advances correctional health research by focusing on jail staff within a unified statewide framework. System wide data enhance generalizability and policy relevance while centering staff perspectives.

全州监狱系统中的惩教人员健康:健康评估、职业压力和组织支持的优先事项。
目的:虽然有大量的研究调查了狱警的健康状况,但很少有研究关注监狱工作人员,而在统一的全州监狱系统中进行的研究就更少了。本研究旨在通过检查田纳西州县监狱的工作人员对健康和健康的看法来解决这一差距,集中监督可以实现系统级洞察力。设计/方法/方法:通过向田纳西州所有120个县监狱的工作人员分发调查问卷,分析了来自412名惩教人员的开放式问卷数据。虽然监狱通常是分散的,但田纳西州的系统在统一的监督下运作,允许一致的访问和可比的分析。对答复进行了专题分析,以确定健康状况、健康威胁和卫生资源。调查结果:工作人员确定慢性压力、倦怠、创伤暴露和环境危害是主要威胁。人手不足、强制加班和不可预测的需求一直与休息时间有限和健康状况下降有关。与会者还强调了组织需求,包括心理健康资源、改善空气质量和更健康的营养选择。研究局限/启示:本研究强调了系统级监狱特定惩教人员健康和福祉研究的重要性。通过展示组织结构、环境条件和人员配置如何影响整个州监狱系统的累积健康风险,研究结果突出了单一地点和以监狱为中心的研究的局限性,这些研究在文献中占主导地位。未来的研究应优先考虑多地点和纵向设计,以检查人员配备模式、轮班结构和物理环境的变化如何随着时间的推移影响健康轨迹。此外,将以工作人员为中心的定性方法与客观健康指标结合起来,将加强因果推理,并推进有关惩教环境中职业紧张、恢复和累积负荷的理论。实际意义:研究结果为寻求改善员工福利的惩教管理人员和政策制定者提供了明确的指导。与会者一致确定了实际的优先事项,包括保密的心理健康服务、创伤响应性支持、改善空气质量和营养、获得健身资源以及保护恢复时间的人员配置改革。重要的是,该研究表明,如果不解决长期人手不足和强制加班等结构性限制,健康倡议不太可能成功。因此,各机构应从孤立的、基于规划的干预措施转向使组织设计与健康促进相一致的综合系统级战略。集中监督机构可以在标准化和支持跨设施的这些努力方面发挥关键作用。社会影响:惩教人员健康的影响超出了劳动力范围,延伸到被监禁的人口、家庭和社区。工作人员健康状况不佳会造成工作倦怠、人员流失和组织不稳定,从而破坏监狱内的安全、护理的连续性和康复方案编制。通过确定员工确定的更健康工作条件的优先事项,本研究支持与机构安全、道德关怀和劳动力可持续性相关的更广泛的公共卫生目标。改善教养所工作人员的福祉还可以减少在监禁环境中围绕心理健康的耻辱感,促进工作人员与被监禁者之间更健康的互动,最终有助于建立更人性化、更稳定和对社会更敏感的教养所系统。原创性/价值:本研究通过在全州统一的框架内关注监狱工作人员来推进惩教健康研究。系统范围内的数据增强了概括性和政策相关性,同时集中了员工的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书