Late-stage vacuolization as a compaction-dependent prognostic marker for day 4 embryo selection.

IF 3.4 Q2 REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY
Yasong Geng, Aixin Yang, Fangfang Dai, Haoyang Dai, Linlin Tao, Guozhen Li, Chun He, Lingyin Kong, Jing Ma, Bo Zheng, Fang Wang
{"title":"Late-stage vacuolization as a compaction-dependent prognostic marker for day 4 embryo selection.","authors":"Yasong Geng, Aixin Yang, Fangfang Dai, Haoyang Dai, Linlin Tao, Guozhen Li, Chun He, Lingyin Kong, Jing Ma, Bo Zheng, Fang Wang","doi":"10.1530/RAF-26-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Graphical abstract: </strong></p><p><strong>Abstract: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of late-stage vacuolization in day 4 embryos relative to compaction status. We retrospectively analyzed 9,779 embryos from 2,409 patients undergoing fresh D4 transfers between 2018 and 2024. Embryos were stratified by compaction status (full, partial, and non-compaction) and assessed for vacuolization. Predictive performance for blastocyst formation was evaluated using ROC curves and logistic regression. The results showed that late-stage vacuolization correlated with higher maternal and paternal age, increased gonadotropin (Gn) dosage, and lower anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH)/estradiol (P < 0.001), but comparable oocyte yield and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) rates (P > 0.05). False-compaction subgroup (77.6% of vacuolized embryos) showed reduced transferable blastocyst (38.7 vs 53.3%, P = 0.021), high-quality blastocyst (9.8 vs 23.4%, P = 0.001), and day 5 blastocyst rates (20.6 vs 35.1%, P = 0.007). A significant interaction was observed between late-stage vacuolization and compaction status affecting both transferable and high-quality blastocyst formation (P for interaction < 0.001). In particular, late-stage vacuolization significantly increased the rates of transferable (OR = 3.34, 95% CI: 2.54-4.39, P < 0.001) and high-quality blastocyst formation (OR = 2.51, 95% CI: 1.60-3.96, P < 0.001) in the non-compacted subgroup. Conversely, it decreased the high-quality blastocyst formation rate in the fully compacted subgroup (OR = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.15-0.89, P = 0.026), while showing no significant effect on transferable blastocyst formation in this group (OR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.28-2.48, P = 0.740). In conclusion, late-stage vacuolization is a compaction-dependent prognostic marker, detrimental in compacted embryos yet potentially beneficial in non-compacted ones. We hypothesize that its effects may be mediated through mechanical stress-induced pseudo-compaction, suggesting that it should be integrated into D4 embryo grading systems in a context-specific manner.</p><p><strong>Lay summary: </strong>This study looked at over 9,700 embryos used in IVF. We found that tiny, bubble-like structures (called 'vacuolization') inside a 4-day-old embryo can be either good or bad news, depending on whether the embryo's cells are tightly or loosely packed together. In tightly packed embryos, these bubbles are harmful and reduce the chance of forming a high-quality embryo. In loosely packed embryos, the same bubbles can be helpful and increase the chance of successful development. This is different from other embryo problems, which are always bad. By checking for these bubbles and how packed the cells are, we can predict which embryo is most likely to lead to a baby 10% more accurately than before. To use this new method, embryos need to be grown for 4 days instead of 3 days.</p>","PeriodicalId":101312,"journal":{"name":"Reproduction & fertility","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13427979/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproduction & fertility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1530/RAF-26-0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Graphical abstract:

Abstract: This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of late-stage vacuolization in day 4 embryos relative to compaction status. We retrospectively analyzed 9,779 embryos from 2,409 patients undergoing fresh D4 transfers between 2018 and 2024. Embryos were stratified by compaction status (full, partial, and non-compaction) and assessed for vacuolization. Predictive performance for blastocyst formation was evaluated using ROC curves and logistic regression. The results showed that late-stage vacuolization correlated with higher maternal and paternal age, increased gonadotropin (Gn) dosage, and lower anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH)/estradiol (P < 0.001), but comparable oocyte yield and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) rates (P > 0.05). False-compaction subgroup (77.6% of vacuolized embryos) showed reduced transferable blastocyst (38.7 vs 53.3%, P = 0.021), high-quality blastocyst (9.8 vs 23.4%, P = 0.001), and day 5 blastocyst rates (20.6 vs 35.1%, P = 0.007). A significant interaction was observed between late-stage vacuolization and compaction status affecting both transferable and high-quality blastocyst formation (P for interaction < 0.001). In particular, late-stage vacuolization significantly increased the rates of transferable (OR = 3.34, 95% CI: 2.54-4.39, P < 0.001) and high-quality blastocyst formation (OR = 2.51, 95% CI: 1.60-3.96, P < 0.001) in the non-compacted subgroup. Conversely, it decreased the high-quality blastocyst formation rate in the fully compacted subgroup (OR = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.15-0.89, P = 0.026), while showing no significant effect on transferable blastocyst formation in this group (OR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.28-2.48, P = 0.740). In conclusion, late-stage vacuolization is a compaction-dependent prognostic marker, detrimental in compacted embryos yet potentially beneficial in non-compacted ones. We hypothesize that its effects may be mediated through mechanical stress-induced pseudo-compaction, suggesting that it should be integrated into D4 embryo grading systems in a context-specific manner.

Lay summary: This study looked at over 9,700 embryos used in IVF. We found that tiny, bubble-like structures (called 'vacuolization') inside a 4-day-old embryo can be either good or bad news, depending on whether the embryo's cells are tightly or loosely packed together. In tightly packed embryos, these bubbles are harmful and reduce the chance of forming a high-quality embryo. In loosely packed embryos, the same bubbles can be helpful and increase the chance of successful development. This is different from other embryo problems, which are always bad. By checking for these bubbles and how packed the cells are, we can predict which embryo is most likely to lead to a baby 10% more accurately than before. To use this new method, embryos need to be grown for 4 days instead of 3 days.

晚期空泡化作为第4天胚胎选择的压实依赖的预后标记。
摘要:本研究旨在评价第4天胚胎后期空泡化与压实状态的预后价值。我们回顾性分析了2018年至2024年间2409例接受新鲜D4移植的患者的9779个胚胎。胚胎按压实状态(完全、部分、不压实)分层,并评估液泡形成情况。采用ROC曲线和logistic回归评估囊胚形成的预测性能。结果表明,晚期空泡化与父母亲年龄增大、促性腺激素(Gn)用量增加、抗勒氏激素(AMH)/雌二醇比值降低相关(P0.05)。假压实亚组(占空泡胚的77.6%)的可转移囊胚减少(38.7%比53.3%,P=0.021),高质量囊胚减少(9.8%比23.4%,P=0.001),第5天囊胚率减少(20.6%比35.1%,P=0.007)。在后期空泡化和压实状态之间观察到显著的相互作用,影响可转移和高质量的囊胚形成(P为相互作用)。摘要:这项研究观察了超过9700个试管婴儿胚胎。我们发现,在4天大的胚胎中,微小的气泡状结构(称为“空泡化”)可能是好消息,也可能是坏消息,这取决于胚胎的细胞是紧密还是松散地聚集在一起。在紧密堆积的胚胎中,这些气泡是有害的,会降低形成高质量胚胎的机会。在松散包装的胚胎中,同样的气泡可以帮助增加成功发育的机会。这与其他胚胎问题不同,这些问题总是不好的。通过检查这些气泡和细胞的堆积情况,我们可以预测哪个胚胎最有可能生出婴儿,比以前准确10%。要使用这种新方法,胚胎需要生长4天而不是3天。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书