What influenced the use of embedded genetic expertise by non-genetic clinicians: a qualitative study using the diffusion of innovations theory and theoretical domains framework.
Trang Thu Do, Belinda Dawson McClaren, Clara Gaff, Melissa Martyn
{"title":"What influenced the use of embedded genetic expertise by non-genetic clinicians: a qualitative study using the diffusion of innovations theory and theoretical domains framework.","authors":"Trang Thu Do, Belinda Dawson McClaren, Clara Gaff, Melissa Martyn","doi":"10.1186/s43058-026-01026-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While employing change agents is a widely used strategy to support implementation of evidence-based practices in healthcare, the perspectives of the target users of this intervention are under-explored. Within a genomic care setting in Australia, we examined non-genetic clinicians' views of and experience with embedded genetic counsellors employed as external change agents to support the adoption of genomics in clinical care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted qualitative interviews with 16 non-genetic healthcare professionals involved in different models of genomic care, all of which employed genetic counsellors as external change agents to provide embedded genetic expertise and support in non-genetic specialty clinics. The Diffusion of Innovations (DOI) theory and the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) were drawn upon to guide the study design and data analysis to explore the enablers/barriers to non-genetic clinicians' use of genetic expertise and the wider implementation context of the change agent approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The TDF domain 'Belief about Consequences' was a positive influence on non-genetic specialists' view of the embedded change agents, when they believed that the change agents positively impacted patient outcomes and the clinicians' knowledge and practice of using genomics in routine care. Meanwhile, major barriers were related to 'Environmental Context & Resources,' e.g. time constraints and logistic hurdles of involving change agents. Perceived attributes related to 'complexity' and 'observability' of genetic expertise were critical factors influencing the decision to put the support to actual use, impacting the diffusion of the genomic innovation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study offers insights into behavioural influences and contextual conditions shaping clinicians' decisions to interact with genetic counsellor change agents and incorporate (or not) their expertise into their routine care. Such understandings can inform future design and implementation of interventions that use change agents to support the adoption of innovations, such as genomics, effectively and sustainably.</p>","PeriodicalId":73355,"journal":{"name":"Implementation science communications","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13543347/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implementation science communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-026-01026-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: While employing change agents is a widely used strategy to support implementation of evidence-based practices in healthcare, the perspectives of the target users of this intervention are under-explored. Within a genomic care setting in Australia, we examined non-genetic clinicians' views of and experience with embedded genetic counsellors employed as external change agents to support the adoption of genomics in clinical care.
Methods: We conducted qualitative interviews with 16 non-genetic healthcare professionals involved in different models of genomic care, all of which employed genetic counsellors as external change agents to provide embedded genetic expertise and support in non-genetic specialty clinics. The Diffusion of Innovations (DOI) theory and the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) were drawn upon to guide the study design and data analysis to explore the enablers/barriers to non-genetic clinicians' use of genetic expertise and the wider implementation context of the change agent approach.
Results: The TDF domain 'Belief about Consequences' was a positive influence on non-genetic specialists' view of the embedded change agents, when they believed that the change agents positively impacted patient outcomes and the clinicians' knowledge and practice of using genomics in routine care. Meanwhile, major barriers were related to 'Environmental Context & Resources,' e.g. time constraints and logistic hurdles of involving change agents. Perceived attributes related to 'complexity' and 'observability' of genetic expertise were critical factors influencing the decision to put the support to actual use, impacting the diffusion of the genomic innovation.
Conclusions: Our study offers insights into behavioural influences and contextual conditions shaping clinicians' decisions to interact with genetic counsellor change agents and incorporate (or not) their expertise into their routine care. Such understandings can inform future design and implementation of interventions that use change agents to support the adoption of innovations, such as genomics, effectively and sustainably.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
