Implementing the collaborative chronic care model for mental health: a nonrandomized clinical trial.

IF 3.5
Christopher J Miller, Jennifer L Sullivan, Kelly Stolzmann, Rebecca A Raciborski, Madisen Brown, Hannah M Bailey, Samantha L Connolly, Alexandra L Morena, Maura Dougherty, Alexandria Henderson, Andrea Rehmert, Lauren M Sippel, Bo Kim
{"title":"Implementing the collaborative chronic care model for mental health: a nonrandomized clinical trial.","authors":"Christopher J Miller, Jennifer L Sullivan, Kelly Stolzmann, Rebecca A Raciborski, Madisen Brown, Hannah M Bailey, Samantha L Connolly, Alexandra L Morena, Maura Dougherty, Alexandria Henderson, Andrea Rehmert, Lauren M Sippel, Bo Kim","doi":"10.1186/s43058-026-00995-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Collaborative chronic care models (CCMs) are an evidence-based way to structure care in outpatient mental health settings. This project investigated whether implementation facilitation (IF) can enhance CCM-consistent outpatient mental health care and reduce mental health hospitalizations compared with centralized technical assistance (CTA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a stepped wedge hybrid 2 implementation-effectiveness trial in outpatient mental health clinics at eight US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers (four waves, two sites each) conducted from 2022 to 2024. Staff participants included clinicians involved in delivering team-based outpatient mental health care. The patient sample consisted of US military veterans treated by 42 participating mental health teams. IF was used for 8-9 months to increase alignment with CCM principles at each participating site. All the sites (including eight comparison sites that were nonrandomized but matched on key variables) had access to CTA. The coprimary outcomes were (a) alignment with CCM-based care evaluated using the Role Clarity and Team Primacy subscales of the Team Development Measure [TDM], and (b) mental health hospitalizations extracted from the electronic health record during the year following initiation of IF.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample included n = 20,835 patients at participating sites and n = 60,221 patients at comparison sites. The pre-implementation TDM was completed by 134 staff members, and post-implementation TDM was completed by 109 staff members. Role Clarity and Team Primacy subscales of the TDM demonstrated small, nonstatistically significant improvement after completing IF (p = 0.33[t-value: 0.97] and 0.14 [t-value: 1.48], respectively). Multivariate generalized linear mixed models indicated participating sites had similar mental health hospitalization rates following IF initiation compared to sites receiving CTA alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This trial revealed that IF to enhance CCM-consistent clinical practices in outpatient mental health teams was associated with small improvements in team functioning that did not achieve statistical significance. Mental health hospitalization rates did not differ for sites using IF versus CTA. TDM-based assessments of team functioning at baseline were similar to post-implementation results from a prior trial, suggesting that CTA to support team-based care may have increased team functioning in these settings prior to trial initiation.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT05997836. Retrospectively registered 18 August 2023: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05997836?term=NCT05997836%26rank=1 . Ethical approval: This evaluation was conducted as a quality improvement activity for VA and was deemed by the R&D Committee at the VA Boston Healthcare System not to be research; therefore, it was not subject to IRB review.</p>","PeriodicalId":73355,"journal":{"name":"Implementation science communications","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13548575/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implementation science communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-026-00995-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Collaborative chronic care models (CCMs) are an evidence-based way to structure care in outpatient mental health settings. This project investigated whether implementation facilitation (IF) can enhance CCM-consistent outpatient mental health care and reduce mental health hospitalizations compared with centralized technical assistance (CTA).

Methods: This was a stepped wedge hybrid 2 implementation-effectiveness trial in outpatient mental health clinics at eight US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers (four waves, two sites each) conducted from 2022 to 2024. Staff participants included clinicians involved in delivering team-based outpatient mental health care. The patient sample consisted of US military veterans treated by 42 participating mental health teams. IF was used for 8-9 months to increase alignment with CCM principles at each participating site. All the sites (including eight comparison sites that were nonrandomized but matched on key variables) had access to CTA. The coprimary outcomes were (a) alignment with CCM-based care evaluated using the Role Clarity and Team Primacy subscales of the Team Development Measure [TDM], and (b) mental health hospitalizations extracted from the electronic health record during the year following initiation of IF.

Results: The sample included n = 20,835 patients at participating sites and n = 60,221 patients at comparison sites. The pre-implementation TDM was completed by 134 staff members, and post-implementation TDM was completed by 109 staff members. Role Clarity and Team Primacy subscales of the TDM demonstrated small, nonstatistically significant improvement after completing IF (p = 0.33[t-value: 0.97] and 0.14 [t-value: 1.48], respectively). Multivariate generalized linear mixed models indicated participating sites had similar mental health hospitalization rates following IF initiation compared to sites receiving CTA alone.

Conclusion: This trial revealed that IF to enhance CCM-consistent clinical practices in outpatient mental health teams was associated with small improvements in team functioning that did not achieve statistical significance. Mental health hospitalization rates did not differ for sites using IF versus CTA. TDM-based assessments of team functioning at baseline were similar to post-implementation results from a prior trial, suggesting that CTA to support team-based care may have increased team functioning in these settings prior to trial initiation.

Trial registration: NCT05997836. Retrospectively registered 18 August 2023: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05997836?term=NCT05997836%26rank=1 . Ethical approval: This evaluation was conducted as a quality improvement activity for VA and was deemed by the R&D Committee at the VA Boston Healthcare System not to be research; therefore, it was not subject to IRB review.

实施精神卫生协作慢性护理模式:一项非随机临床试验。
背景:协作慢性护理模式(CCMs)是一种基于证据的方式来组织门诊精神卫生机构的护理。本项目探讨实施促进(IF)与集中式技术援助(CTA)相比,是否能提高符合ccm的门诊精神卫生保健服务,并减少精神卫生住院率。方法:这是一项阶梯楔形混合实施-有效性试验,于2022年至2024年在8个美国退伍军人事务部(VA)医疗中心的门诊精神卫生诊所进行(四波,每波两个站点)。工作人员参与者包括参与提供以团队为基础的门诊精神卫生保健的临床医生。患者样本由42个参与心理健康团队治疗的美国退伍军人组成。IF使用了8-9个月,以增加每个参与地点与CCM原则的一致性。所有站点(包括8个非随机但在关键变量上匹配的比较站点)都可以访问CTA。主要结果是(a)使用团队发展量表[TDM]的角色清晰度和团队首要性子量表评估基于ccm的护理的一致性,以及(b)从电子健康记录中提取的精神健康住院情况。结果:样本包括参与站点n = 20,835例患者和比较站点n = 60,221例患者。执行前TDM由134名工作人员完成,执行后TDM由109名工作人员完成。完成IF后,TDM的角色清晰度和团队首要性分量表显示出微小的、无统计学意义的改善(p分别= 0.33[t值:0.97]和0.14 [t值:1.48])。多变量广义线性混合模型表明,与单独接受CTA的站点相比,参与站点在IF启动后的精神健康住院率相似。结论:本试验显示,在门诊精神卫生团队中,IF加强与ccm一致的临床实践与团队功能的微小改善相关,但没有统计学意义。心理健康住院率在使用IF和CTA的地点没有差异。基于tdm的基线团队功能评估与先前试验的实施后结果相似,表明在试验开始之前,CTA支持团队护理可能增加了这些环境中的团队功能。试验注册:NCT05997836。回顾性注册于2023年8月18日:https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05997836?term=NCT05997836%26rank=1。伦理批准:该评估是作为VA的质量改进活动进行的,并被VA波士顿医疗保健系统的研发委员会认为不是研究;因此,它不受内部审查委员会的审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书