Perceptual Tuning to Structure: Integrating the Phonetic Detail of Coarticulatory Vowel Nasalization With Prosodic and Information Structure.

IF 1.1 2区 文学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Sahyang Kim, Holger Mitterer, Taehong Cho
{"title":"Perceptual Tuning to Structure: Integrating the Phonetic Detail of Coarticulatory Vowel Nasalization With Prosodic and Information Structure.","authors":"Sahyang Kim, Holger Mitterer, Taehong Cho","doi":"10.1177/00238309261453071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study explores prosodically driven perceptual adjustment of a non-contrastive coarticulatory feature. Specifically, it examines how prosodic prominence and information structure influence the perception of anticipatory vowel nasalization in CVN in American English as a cue to an upcoming nasal consonant. Using a two-alternative forced-choice task, we tested whether the same acoustic degree of nasalization is interpreted differently depending on prosodic and information-structural contexts, and whether these effects are consistent across native English speakers and Korean learners of English. Listeners identified target words (<i>Bob</i> or <i>bomb</i>) from a nasalization continuum embedded in carrier sentences (\"(No,) Riley wrote Bob/bomb slowly\"), where the coda consonant was masked by noise. Prosodic prominence was manipulated by adjusting pitch and amplitude of surrounding words while keeping the target constant; and information structure was manipulated by including or omitting <i>No</i>, signaling contrastive focus. For a given stimulus, listeners gave more nasal responses (<i>bomb</i>) when the target was prosodically prominent or preceded by <i>No</i>, implying that they compensate for reduced vowel nasality in these contexts. The fact that <i>No</i> influenced perception independent of prosody suggests that information structure can modulate perceptual compensation beyond acoustic-prosodic cues, reflecting a top-down effect of discourse meaning. Finally, although Korean listeners gave fewer nasal responses overall-possibly due to reliance on acoustic detail or perceptual hypercorrection-both groups showed similar sensitivity to prosodic and information-structural cues. These findings taken together point toward a shared perceptual mechanism in both native and non-native perception that integrates fine-grained phonetic detail with prosodic and information-structural contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":51255,"journal":{"name":"Language and Speech","volume":" ","pages":"238309261453071"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language and Speech","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309261453071","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores prosodically driven perceptual adjustment of a non-contrastive coarticulatory feature. Specifically, it examines how prosodic prominence and information structure influence the perception of anticipatory vowel nasalization in CVN in American English as a cue to an upcoming nasal consonant. Using a two-alternative forced-choice task, we tested whether the same acoustic degree of nasalization is interpreted differently depending on prosodic and information-structural contexts, and whether these effects are consistent across native English speakers and Korean learners of English. Listeners identified target words (Bob or bomb) from a nasalization continuum embedded in carrier sentences ("(No,) Riley wrote Bob/bomb slowly"), where the coda consonant was masked by noise. Prosodic prominence was manipulated by adjusting pitch and amplitude of surrounding words while keeping the target constant; and information structure was manipulated by including or omitting No, signaling contrastive focus. For a given stimulus, listeners gave more nasal responses (bomb) when the target was prosodically prominent or preceded by No, implying that they compensate for reduced vowel nasality in these contexts. The fact that No influenced perception independent of prosody suggests that information structure can modulate perceptual compensation beyond acoustic-prosodic cues, reflecting a top-down effect of discourse meaning. Finally, although Korean listeners gave fewer nasal responses overall-possibly due to reliance on acoustic detail or perceptual hypercorrection-both groups showed similar sensitivity to prosodic and information-structural cues. These findings taken together point toward a shared perceptual mechanism in both native and non-native perception that integrates fine-grained phonetic detail with prosodic and information-structural contexts.

感知调谐到结构:将协发音元音鼻化的语音细节与韵律结构和信息结构相结合。
本研究探讨了韵律驱动的非对比协同发音特征的知觉调节。具体来说,它研究了韵律突出和信息结构如何影响美式英语CVN中预期元音鼻音化的感知,作为即将到来的鼻辅音的线索。使用双选项强迫选择任务,我们测试了相同的鼻音程度是否会因韵律和信息结构上下文而产生不同的解释,以及这些影响在英语母语者和韩国英语学习者中是否一致。听众从嵌入在载体句中的鼻音连续体中识别出目标单词(Bob或bomb)(“(不,)莱利慢慢地写Bob/bomb”),其中尾辅音被噪音掩盖。在保持目标不变的情况下,通过调节周围词的音高和振幅来控制韵律突出;通过包括或省略No来操纵信息结构,表明对比焦点。对于给定的刺激,当目标在韵律上突出或前面有No时,听者会给出更多的鼻音反应(bomb),这意味着他们在这些语境中弥补了元音鼻音的减少。No对独立于韵律的感知产生影响的事实表明,信息结构可以调节声音韵律线索之外的感知补偿,反映了话语意义的自上而下效应。最后,尽管韩国听众的鼻腔反应总体上较少(可能是由于依赖于声学细节或知觉超校正),但两组人对韵律和信息结构线索表现出相似的敏感性。这些发现表明,在母语和非母语感知中,存在一种共同的感知机制,即将细粒度的语音细节与韵律和信息结构上下文相结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Language and Speech
Language and Speech AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
39
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Language and Speech is a peer-reviewed journal which provides an international forum for communication among researchers in the disciplines that contribute to our understanding of the production, perception, processing, learning, use, and disorders of speech and language. The journal accepts reports of original research in all these areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书