Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Combined With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Comprehensive Single-Arm Meta-Analysis Approach.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Justin Dreyer, Raksha M Narasimhan, Ana R Dias Neto, Yalda Zarnegarnia, Lauren Nagel, Anika Varsani, William Jin, Benjamin Spieler, Jonathan Bell, John Bryant, Neil B Newman
{"title":"Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Combined With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Comprehensive Single-Arm Meta-Analysis Approach.","authors":"Justin Dreyer, Raksha M Narasimhan, Ana R Dias Neto, Yalda Zarnegarnia, Lauren Nagel, Anika Varsani, William Jin, Benjamin Spieler, Jonathan Bell, John Bryant, Neil B Newman","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are the frontline regimen, but the benefit of stereotactic body radiation (SBRT) in combination is unclear. Given randomized evidence for survival benefit with SBRT plus sorafenib, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess whether adding SBRT improves survival and response outcomes with acceptable toxicity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Per PRISMA guidelines, we reviewed studies published from 2020 onward evaluating adults with intermediate or advanced HCC (BCLC B/C) treated with SBRT plus ICI. Eligible studies included phase II-III RCTs, prospective cohorts, prospective single-arm studies, and retrospective comparative cohorts (≥20 patients with confounding adjustment). Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and grade 3+ toxicity. A single-arm meta-analysis was performed using the REML method; logit transformation was applied for proportions, and heterogeneity was assessed through I 2 and Q-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1120 screened studies, 6 (258 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Pooled median OS was 22.7 months (95% CI: 17.4-29.5; I2 =68.5%). Pooled median PFS was 7.9 months (95% CI: 5.6-11.2; I2 =92.1%). DCR was 93.4% (95% CI: 56.5-99.4%) and ORR was 56.3% (95% CI: 38-73%). Grade ≥3 toxicity occurred in 17.5% of patients (95% CI: 12.9-23.3%; I2 =0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SBRT combined with ICI demonstrates encouraging survival and response outcomes with manageable toxicity in unresectable HCC. Prospective randomized trials are needed to confirm efficacy and define optimal treatment algorithms.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0000000000001341","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: In locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are the frontline regimen, but the benefit of stereotactic body radiation (SBRT) in combination is unclear. Given randomized evidence for survival benefit with SBRT plus sorafenib, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess whether adding SBRT improves survival and response outcomes with acceptable toxicity.

Methods: Per PRISMA guidelines, we reviewed studies published from 2020 onward evaluating adults with intermediate or advanced HCC (BCLC B/C) treated with SBRT plus ICI. Eligible studies included phase II-III RCTs, prospective cohorts, prospective single-arm studies, and retrospective comparative cohorts (≥20 patients with confounding adjustment). Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and grade 3+ toxicity. A single-arm meta-analysis was performed using the REML method; logit transformation was applied for proportions, and heterogeneity was assessed through I 2 and Q-test.

Results: Of 1120 screened studies, 6 (258 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Pooled median OS was 22.7 months (95% CI: 17.4-29.5; I2 =68.5%). Pooled median PFS was 7.9 months (95% CI: 5.6-11.2; I2 =92.1%). DCR was 93.4% (95% CI: 56.5-99.4%) and ORR was 56.3% (95% CI: 38-73%). Grade ≥3 toxicity occurred in 17.5% of patients (95% CI: 12.9-23.3%; I2 =0%).

Conclusions: SBRT combined with ICI demonstrates encouraging survival and response outcomes with manageable toxicity in unresectable HCC. Prospective randomized trials are needed to confirm efficacy and define optimal treatment algorithms.

立体定向放射治疗联合免疫检查点抑制剂治疗不可切除的肝细胞癌:一项综合单臂荟萃分析方法
目的:在局部晚期肝细胞癌(HCC)中,免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)是一线治疗方案,但立体定向体放射(SBRT)联合治疗的益处尚不清楚。鉴于SBRT联合索拉非尼对生存有利的随机证据,我们进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,以评估添加SBRT是否能在可接受的毒性下改善生存和反应结果。方法:根据PRISMA指南,我们回顾了自2020年以来发表的评估SBRT + ICI治疗的中晚期成人HCC (BCLC B/C)的研究。符合条件的研究包括II-III期随机对照试验、前瞻性队列、前瞻性单臂研究和回顾性比较队列(≥20例经混杂校正的患者)。主要结局是总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)。次要终点包括客观缓解率(ORR)、疾病控制率(DCR)和3+级毒性。采用REML方法进行单臂meta分析;比例采用logit变换,异质性采用I2检验和q检验。结果:在1120项筛选研究中,6项(258例)患者符合纳入标准。合并中位OS为22.7个月(95% CI: 17.4-29.5; I2=68.5%)。合并中位PFS为7.9个月(95% CI: 5.6-11.2; I2=92.1%)。DCR为93.4% (95% CI: 56.5-99.4%), ORR为56.3% (95% CI: 38-73%)。17.5%的患者发生≥3级毒性(95% CI: 12.9-23.3%; I2=0%)。结论:SBRT联合ICI在不可切除的HCC中显示出令人鼓舞的生存和反应结果,并且毒性可控。需要前瞻性随机试验来确认疗效并确定最佳治疗算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
130
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​American Journal of Clinical Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal for cancer surgeons, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, GYN oncologists, and pediatric oncologists. The emphasis of AJCO is on combined modality multidisciplinary loco-regional management of cancer. The journal also gives emphasis to translational research, outcome studies, and cost utility analyses, and includes opinion pieces and review articles. The editorial board includes a large number of distinguished surgeons, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, GYN oncologists, pediatric oncologists, and others who are internationally recognized for expertise in their fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书