Efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1-based therapies in advanced melanoma across acral and mucosal subtypes: a nationwide retrospective cohort study.

IF 5.1
Yuan Qiao, Xiao Fu, Iltaf Hussain, Weihong Ge, Wei Yang, Renbin Jiang, Xiaoyan Dai, Haisheng Chen, Jinyi Zhao, Meng Tang, Fei Mu, Hao Wang, Qiuhui Wu, Xing Xia, Yunnan Zhang, Suzhi Ji, Ying Xu, Xinrui Cao, Jiexin Wang, Le Gao, Jingwen Wang, Yu Yao, Yu Fang
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1-based therapies in advanced melanoma across acral and mucosal subtypes: a nationwide retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Yuan Qiao, Xiao Fu, Iltaf Hussain, Weihong Ge, Wei Yang, Renbin Jiang, Xiaoyan Dai, Haisheng Chen, Jinyi Zhao, Meng Tang, Fei Mu, Hao Wang, Qiuhui Wu, Xing Xia, Yunnan Zhang, Suzhi Ji, Ying Xu, Xinrui Cao, Jiexin Wang, Le Gao, Jingwen Wang, Yu Yao, Yu Fang","doi":"10.1007/s00262-026-04460-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acral melanoma (AM) and mucosal melanoma (MM) respond poorly to anti-PD-1 monotherapy. Therefore, there is an urgent need to explore safe and effective anti-PD-1-based combined therapies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A nationwide real-world cohort study consecutively included patients with advanced melanoma treated with anti-PD-1 in China between July 1, 2018, and June 30, 2023. The Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) system was used across all centers. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and immune-related adverse events (irAEs), with a secondary endpoints of objective response rate (ORR). Multivariable Cox and logistic regression models were conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of different anti-PD-1-based combination therapies with anti-PD-1 monotherapy. Stratified analyses were performed to evaluate the effect of therapies in cutaneous, acral, mucosal, and unknown primary subtypes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 431 advanced melanoma patients comprising 22% cutaneous, 39% acral, 32% mucosal, and 7% unknown primary subtypes were included. Multivariable Cox analysis indicated that compared with anti-PD-1 monotherapy, anti-PD-1 + anti-VEGF + chemotherapy (HR, 0.4 [0.2, 0.7], P = 0.005) and anti-PD-1 + anti-VEGF therapy (HR, 0.4 [0.2, 0.9], P = 0.018) showed significant PFS benefit in AM and MM, respectively. Notably, anti-PD-1 + IFN-α1b showed a nonsignificantly longer PFS and OS in AM. A multivariate logistic regression model found that anti-PD-1-based combination therapies were significantly associated with grade 1-2 irAEs, while only anti-PD-1 + IFN-α1b + anti-VEGF therapy was significantly associated with high risk of grade 3-5 irAEs (OR, 4.4 [1.3-14.7], p = 0.017), without a significant survival benefit.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results provide evidence for anti-PD-1 + anti-VEGF + chemotherapy and anti-PD-1 + IFN-α1b in AM and anti-PD-1 + anti-VEGF therapy in MM, as the long-term benefit and acceptable toxicity. However, for the patients who received anti-PD-1 + IFN-α1b + anti-VEGF, cautionary notes and awareness of drug safety should be raised, as the triple therapy with multiple mechanisms may increase the potential risk of toxicity.</p>","PeriodicalId":520581,"journal":{"name":"Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13578169/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-026-04460-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Acral melanoma (AM) and mucosal melanoma (MM) respond poorly to anti-PD-1 monotherapy. Therefore, there is an urgent need to explore safe and effective anti-PD-1-based combined therapies.

Methods: A nationwide real-world cohort study consecutively included patients with advanced melanoma treated with anti-PD-1 in China between July 1, 2018, and June 30, 2023. The Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) system was used across all centers. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and immune-related adverse events (irAEs), with a secondary endpoints of objective response rate (ORR). Multivariable Cox and logistic regression models were conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of different anti-PD-1-based combination therapies with anti-PD-1 monotherapy. Stratified analyses were performed to evaluate the effect of therapies in cutaneous, acral, mucosal, and unknown primary subtypes.

Results: A total of 431 advanced melanoma patients comprising 22% cutaneous, 39% acral, 32% mucosal, and 7% unknown primary subtypes were included. Multivariable Cox analysis indicated that compared with anti-PD-1 monotherapy, anti-PD-1 + anti-VEGF + chemotherapy (HR, 0.4 [0.2, 0.7], P = 0.005) and anti-PD-1 + anti-VEGF therapy (HR, 0.4 [0.2, 0.9], P = 0.018) showed significant PFS benefit in AM and MM, respectively. Notably, anti-PD-1 + IFN-α1b showed a nonsignificantly longer PFS and OS in AM. A multivariate logistic regression model found that anti-PD-1-based combination therapies were significantly associated with grade 1-2 irAEs, while only anti-PD-1 + IFN-α1b + anti-VEGF therapy was significantly associated with high risk of grade 3-5 irAEs (OR, 4.4 [1.3-14.7], p = 0.017), without a significant survival benefit.

Conclusions: Our results provide evidence for anti-PD-1 + anti-VEGF + chemotherapy and anti-PD-1 + IFN-α1b in AM and anti-PD-1 + anti-VEGF therapy in MM, as the long-term benefit and acceptable toxicity. However, for the patients who received anti-PD-1 + IFN-α1b + anti-VEGF, cautionary notes and awareness of drug safety should be raised, as the triple therapy with multiple mechanisms may increase the potential risk of toxicity.

基于抗pd -1疗法治疗肢端和粘膜亚型晚期黑色素瘤的疗效和安全性:一项全国回顾性队列研究
背景:肢端黑色素瘤(AM)和粘膜黑色素瘤(MM)对抗pd -1单药治疗反应较差。因此,迫切需要探索安全有效的抗pd -1联合疗法。方法:在2018年7月1日至2023年6月30日期间,一项全国范围内的真实世界队列研究连续纳入了中国接受抗pd -1治疗的晚期黑色素瘤患者。研究电子数据捕获(REDCap)系统在所有中心使用。主要终点是无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)和免疫相关不良事件(irAEs),次要终点是客观缓解率(ORR)。采用多变量Cox和logistic回归模型比较不同抗pd -1联合治疗与单药治疗的疗效和安全性。进行分层分析,以评估治疗对皮肤、肢端、粘膜和未知原发性亚型的影响。结果:共纳入431例晚期黑色素瘤患者,其中22%为皮肤亚型,39%为肢端亚型,32%为粘膜亚型,7%为未知原发性亚型。多变量Cox分析显示,与抗pd -1单药治疗相比,抗pd -1 +抗vegf +化疗(HR, 0.4 [0.2, 0.7], P = 0.005)和抗pd -1 +抗vegf治疗(HR, 0.4 [0.2, 0.9], P = 0.018)分别在AM和MM中显示显著的PFS改善。值得注意的是,抗pd -1 + IFN-α1b在AM中的PFS和OS均无明显延长。多因素logistic回归模型发现,以抗pd -1为基础的联合治疗与1-2级irAEs显著相关,而仅抗pd -1 + IFN-α1b +抗vegf治疗与3-5级irAEs高风险显著相关(OR, 4.4 [1.3-14.7], p = 0.017),无显著生存获益。结论:我们的研究结果为AM抗pd -1 +抗vegf +化疗和AM抗pd -1 + IFN-α1b治疗以及MM抗pd -1 +抗vegf治疗的长期获益和可接受的毒性提供了证据。然而,对于接受抗pd -1 + IFN-α1b +抗vegf治疗的患者,由于多机制的三联治疗可能会增加潜在的毒性风险,应提高警惕和药物安全意识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书