DROP: Distributional and Regular Optimism and Pessimism for Reinforcement Learning

IF 2.1 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Neural Computation Pub Date : 2026-07-27 Epub Date: 2026-08-06 DOI:10.1162/NECO.a.1546
Taisuke Kobayashi
{"title":"DROP: Distributional and Regular Optimism and Pessimism for Reinforcement Learning","authors":"Taisuke Kobayashi","doi":"10.1162/NECO.a.1546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In reinforcement learning (RL), temporal difference (TD) error is known to be related to the firing rate of dopamine neurons. It has been observed that each dopamine neuron does not behave uniformly, but each responds to the TD error in an optimistic or pessimistic manner, interpreted as a kind of distributional RL. To explain such biological data, a heuristic model has also been introduced with learning rates asymmetric for the positive and negative TD errors. However, this heuristic model is not theoretically grounded, and it is unknown whether it can work as an RL algorithm. This letter therefore introduces a novel theoretically grounded model with optimism and pessimism, which is derived from control as inference. In combination with ensemble learning, a distributional value function as a critic is estimated from regularly introduced optimism and pessimism. Based on its central value, a policy in an actor is improved. This proposed algorithm, so-called DROP (distributional and regular optimism and pessimism), is compared on dynamic tasks. Although the heuristic model showed poor learning performance, DROP demonstrated excellent performance in all tasks with high generality. In addition, DROP achieved learning performance comparable to the state-of-the-art algorithms. In other words, it was suggested that DROP is a new model that can elicit the potential contributions of optimism and pessimism.","PeriodicalId":54731,"journal":{"name":"Neural Computation","volume":"38 8","pages":"1376-1407"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neural Computation","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11644371/","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In reinforcement learning (RL), temporal difference (TD) error is known to be related to the firing rate of dopamine neurons. It has been observed that each dopamine neuron does not behave uniformly, but each responds to the TD error in an optimistic or pessimistic manner, interpreted as a kind of distributional RL. To explain such biological data, a heuristic model has also been introduced with learning rates asymmetric for the positive and negative TD errors. However, this heuristic model is not theoretically grounded, and it is unknown whether it can work as an RL algorithm. This letter therefore introduces a novel theoretically grounded model with optimism and pessimism, which is derived from control as inference. In combination with ensemble learning, a distributional value function as a critic is estimated from regularly introduced optimism and pessimism. Based on its central value, a policy in an actor is improved. This proposed algorithm, so-called DROP (distributional and regular optimism and pessimism), is compared on dynamic tasks. Although the heuristic model showed poor learning performance, DROP demonstrated excellent performance in all tasks with high generality. In addition, DROP achieved learning performance comparable to the state-of-the-art algorithms. In other words, it was suggested that DROP is a new model that can elicit the potential contributions of optimism and pessimism.
DROP:强化学习的分布和规则乐观主义和悲观主义。
在强化学习(RL)中,时间差(TD)误差与多巴胺神经元的放电率有关。已经观察到,每个多巴胺神经元的行为并不一致,但每个神经元对TD误差的反应都是乐观或悲观的,这被解释为一种分布强化学习。为了解释这样的生物数据,还引入了一个启发式模型,其学习率对正TD和负TD误差不对称。然而,这种启发式模型没有理论基础,它是否可以作为RL算法工作还是未知的。因此,这封信介绍了一个新的理论基础的乐观主义和悲观主义模型,这是由控制作为推理推导出来的。结合集成学习,从定期引入的乐观主义和悲观主义中估计作为批评家的分布价值函数。基于其核心价值,对参与者中的策略进行改进。该算法被称为DROP (distributional and regular optimism and pessimism),并在动态任务中进行了比较。虽然启发式模型的学习性能较差,但DROP在所有具有高通用性的任务中表现优异。此外,DROP实现了与最先进算法相当的学习性能。换句话说,有人认为DROP是一种新的模式,可以引出乐观主义和悲观主义的潜在贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neural Computation
Neural Computation 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.40%
发文量
83
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: Neural Computation is uniquely positioned at the crossroads between neuroscience and TMCS and welcomes the submission of original papers from all areas of TMCS, including: Advanced experimental design; Analysis of chemical sensor data; Connectomic reconstructions; Analysis of multielectrode and optical recordings; Genetic data for cell identity; Analysis of behavioral data; Multiscale models; Analysis of molecular mechanisms; Neuroinformatics; Analysis of brain imaging data; Neuromorphic engineering; Principles of neural coding, computation, circuit dynamics, and plasticity; Theories of brain function.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书