{"title":"DROP: Distributional and Regular Optimism and Pessimism for Reinforcement Learning","authors":"Taisuke Kobayashi","doi":"10.1162/NECO.a.1546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In reinforcement learning (RL), temporal difference (TD) error is known to be related to the firing rate of dopamine neurons. It has been observed that each dopamine neuron does not behave uniformly, but each responds to the TD error in an optimistic or pessimistic manner, interpreted as a kind of distributional RL. To explain such biological data, a heuristic model has also been introduced with learning rates asymmetric for the positive and negative TD errors. However, this heuristic model is not theoretically grounded, and it is unknown whether it can work as an RL algorithm. This letter therefore introduces a novel theoretically grounded model with optimism and pessimism, which is derived from control as inference. In combination with ensemble learning, a distributional value function as a critic is estimated from regularly introduced optimism and pessimism. Based on its central value, a policy in an actor is improved. This proposed algorithm, so-called DROP (distributional and regular optimism and pessimism), is compared on dynamic tasks. Although the heuristic model showed poor learning performance, DROP demonstrated excellent performance in all tasks with high generality. In addition, DROP achieved learning performance comparable to the state-of-the-art algorithms. In other words, it was suggested that DROP is a new model that can elicit the potential contributions of optimism and pessimism.","PeriodicalId":54731,"journal":{"name":"Neural Computation","volume":"38 8","pages":"1376-1407"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neural Computation","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11644371/","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In reinforcement learning (RL), temporal difference (TD) error is known to be related to the firing rate of dopamine neurons. It has been observed that each dopamine neuron does not behave uniformly, but each responds to the TD error in an optimistic or pessimistic manner, interpreted as a kind of distributional RL. To explain such biological data, a heuristic model has also been introduced with learning rates asymmetric for the positive and negative TD errors. However, this heuristic model is not theoretically grounded, and it is unknown whether it can work as an RL algorithm. This letter therefore introduces a novel theoretically grounded model with optimism and pessimism, which is derived from control as inference. In combination with ensemble learning, a distributional value function as a critic is estimated from regularly introduced optimism and pessimism. Based on its central value, a policy in an actor is improved. This proposed algorithm, so-called DROP (distributional and regular optimism and pessimism), is compared on dynamic tasks. Although the heuristic model showed poor learning performance, DROP demonstrated excellent performance in all tasks with high generality. In addition, DROP achieved learning performance comparable to the state-of-the-art algorithms. In other words, it was suggested that DROP is a new model that can elicit the potential contributions of optimism and pessimism.
在强化学习(RL)中,时间差(TD)误差与多巴胺神经元的放电率有关。已经观察到,每个多巴胺神经元的行为并不一致,但每个神经元对TD误差的反应都是乐观或悲观的,这被解释为一种分布强化学习。为了解释这样的生物数据,还引入了一个启发式模型,其学习率对正TD和负TD误差不对称。然而,这种启发式模型没有理论基础,它是否可以作为RL算法工作还是未知的。因此,这封信介绍了一个新的理论基础的乐观主义和悲观主义模型,这是由控制作为推理推导出来的。结合集成学习,从定期引入的乐观主义和悲观主义中估计作为批评家的分布价值函数。基于其核心价值,对参与者中的策略进行改进。该算法被称为DROP (distributional and regular optimism and pessimism),并在动态任务中进行了比较。虽然启发式模型的学习性能较差,但DROP在所有具有高通用性的任务中表现优异。此外,DROP实现了与最先进算法相当的学习性能。换句话说,有人认为DROP是一种新的模式,可以引出乐观主义和悲观主义的潜在贡献。
期刊介绍:
Neural Computation is uniquely positioned at the crossroads between neuroscience and TMCS and welcomes the submission of original papers from all areas of TMCS, including: Advanced experimental design; Analysis of chemical sensor data; Connectomic reconstructions; Analysis of multielectrode and optical recordings; Genetic data for cell identity; Analysis of behavioral data; Multiscale models; Analysis of molecular mechanisms; Neuroinformatics; Analysis of brain imaging data; Neuromorphic engineering; Principles of neural coding, computation, circuit dynamics, and plasticity; Theories of brain function.