Emergence of Single-Week Adjuvant Radiation Therapy for Early-Stage Breast Cancer in the United States.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Nimisha Kasliwal, Marie Gordon, Evan Becker, Kai Ding, Shearwood McClelland
{"title":"Emergence of Single-Week Adjuvant Radiation Therapy for Early-Stage Breast Cancer in the United States.","authors":"Nimisha Kasliwal, Marie Gordon, Evan Becker, Kai Ding, Shearwood McClelland","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Over the past 2 decades, adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) for early-stage breast cancer has shifted toward shorter regimens. While initially occurring over 5 to 6 weeks, level 1 evidence has supported the equivalence of 3 to 4 weeks of adjuvant RT. More recently, level 1 evidence has demonstrated equivalence of 1-week ultrahypofractionated RT (UHRT) to 3-week adjuvant RT. This study evaluates the adoption of UHRT in the United States before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with early-stage breast cancer who received lumpectomy and adjuvant RT from 2018 to 2022 were assessed using the National Cancer Database (NCDB). UHRT was defined as 5.2 Gy per fraction with a total dose of 26 Gy. Data were grouped as prepandemic (2018 to 2019), pandemic (2020), and postpandemic (2021 to 2022). The adoption of UHRT and RT completion rates was assessed among these periods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Before, during, and after the pandemic, 0.98% (133/13,154), 4.88% (303/6208), and 14.27% of patients (2044/14,321) underwent UHRT, respectively (P<0.0001). Cumulative RT completion rates were 94.85% before the pandemic, 96.10% during the pandemic, and 96.83% after the pandemic (P<0.0001), demonstrating a significant increase in adoption. For UHRT, completion rates were 100.00% prepandemic, 99.34% during the pandemic, and 99.46% postpandemic (P=0.6651), higher than overall RT completion rates across all 3 periods.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nationwide data demonstrates a 14-fold increase in the use of UHRT from 2018 to 2022. Despite this increase and the near 100% completion rates for UHRT, UHRT remains underutilized compared with standard and hypofractionated regimens. These findings indicate fertile ground for increased UHRT adoption in breast cancer care nationwide.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0000000000001336","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Over the past 2 decades, adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) for early-stage breast cancer has shifted toward shorter regimens. While initially occurring over 5 to 6 weeks, level 1 evidence has supported the equivalence of 3 to 4 weeks of adjuvant RT. More recently, level 1 evidence has demonstrated equivalence of 1-week ultrahypofractionated RT (UHRT) to 3-week adjuvant RT. This study evaluates the adoption of UHRT in the United States before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: Patients with early-stage breast cancer who received lumpectomy and adjuvant RT from 2018 to 2022 were assessed using the National Cancer Database (NCDB). UHRT was defined as 5.2 Gy per fraction with a total dose of 26 Gy. Data were grouped as prepandemic (2018 to 2019), pandemic (2020), and postpandemic (2021 to 2022). The adoption of UHRT and RT completion rates was assessed among these periods.

Results: Before, during, and after the pandemic, 0.98% (133/13,154), 4.88% (303/6208), and 14.27% of patients (2044/14,321) underwent UHRT, respectively (P<0.0001). Cumulative RT completion rates were 94.85% before the pandemic, 96.10% during the pandemic, and 96.83% after the pandemic (P<0.0001), demonstrating a significant increase in adoption. For UHRT, completion rates were 100.00% prepandemic, 99.34% during the pandemic, and 99.46% postpandemic (P=0.6651), higher than overall RT completion rates across all 3 periods.

Conclusion: Nationwide data demonstrates a 14-fold increase in the use of UHRT from 2018 to 2022. Despite this increase and the near 100% completion rates for UHRT, UHRT remains underutilized compared with standard and hypofractionated regimens. These findings indicate fertile ground for increased UHRT adoption in breast cancer care nationwide.

美国早期乳腺癌单周辅助放疗的出现。
目的:在过去的20年里,早期乳腺癌的辅助放射治疗(RT)已经转向了更短的治疗方案。虽然最初发生在5至6周,但一级证据支持3至4周辅助放疗的等效性。最近,一级证据证明1周超低分割放疗(UHRT)与3周辅助放疗的等效性。本研究评估了美国在COVID-19大流行之前、期间和之后采用UHRT的情况。方法:使用国家癌症数据库(NCDB)对2018 - 2022年接受乳房肿瘤切除术和辅助放疗的早期乳腺癌患者进行评估。UHRT被定义为每组分5.2 Gy,总剂量为26 Gy。数据分为大流行前(2018年至2019年)、大流行前(2020年)和大流行后(2021年至2022年)。在这些时间段内评估了UHRT的采用和RT的完成率。结果:在大流行之前、期间和之后,分别有0.98%(133/13,154)、4.88%(303/6208)和14.27%(2044/14,321)的患者接受了UHRT(结论:全国数据显示,从2018年到2022年,UHRT的使用增加了14倍。尽管UHRT的完成率接近100%,但与标准和低分割方案相比,UHRT仍未得到充分利用。这些发现表明,在全国范围内乳腺癌护理中,UHRT的采用具有广阔的前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
130
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​American Journal of Clinical Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal for cancer surgeons, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, GYN oncologists, and pediatric oncologists. The emphasis of AJCO is on combined modality multidisciplinary loco-regional management of cancer. The journal also gives emphasis to translational research, outcome studies, and cost utility analyses, and includes opinion pieces and review articles. The editorial board includes a large number of distinguished surgeons, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, GYN oncologists, pediatric oncologists, and others who are internationally recognized for expertise in their fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书